Marcelo Antonini

Dr. Marcelo Antonini


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2023 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMarcelo Antonini
Marcelo Antonini
André MattarAndré Mattar
André Mattar
FRFernanda Grace Bauk Richter
Fernanda Grace Bauk Richter
GPGabriel Duque Pannain
Gabriel Duque Pannain
MTMarina Diogenes Teixeira
Marina Diogenes Teixeira
JRJuliana Monte Real
Juliana Monte Real
We aimed to evaluate the pCR rate in patients receiving NAC for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) in a multicenter cohort in Brazil. Additionally, we aimed to use RWD to assess the impact of pCR on OS and DFS. This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study that included female patients over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer and received NAC. OS and DFS at five years were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Additionally, we conducted a multivariate analysis to identify factors that were significantly associated with pCR and OS. From 2011 to 2020, 1891 patients were included in the study, and 421 (22,3%) achieved pCR (ypT0 ypN0). Considering the presence of residual DCIS, pCR was achieved in 467 patients (23,5%). The pCR rate varied between the subtypes: HER-2+ (p = 0,016) and clinical stage IIIA and IIIB (p < 0,001). Among HER-2+ patients, those who received trastuzumab had a significantly higher pCR rate than those who did not receive trastuzumab (p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients with TNBC who received treatment with platinum-based regimens also showed higher pCR rates (p < 0.0001). OS was grouped according to pCR status, and the OS rate was 88,3% in the pCR group and 58.1% in the non-pCR group (p < 0.0001). The five-year DFS was 92.2% in the pCR group and 64.3% in the non-pCR group (p < 0.0001). The pCR rate and its prognostic value varied across BC subtypes. In our study, pCR could be used as a surrogate of favorable clinical outcome, as it was associated with higher OS and DFS rates.


20 March 2025 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
André MattarAndré Mattar
André Mattar
MAMarcelo Antonini
Marcelo Antonini
FCFrancisco Pimentel Cavalcante
Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante
FZFelipe Zerwes
Felipe Zerwes
EMEduardo Camargo Millen
Eduardo Camargo Millen
JRJuliana Monte Real
Juliana Monte Real
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for the axillary evaluation of clinically node-negative early breast cancer. The ACOSOG Z0011 study demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary dissection for limited SLNB disease, with other trials confirming SLNB alone or with axillary radiotherapy (AR) as non-inferior. We followed PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROSPERO. Using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (2010-2024). Outcomes, including 5-, 8-, and 10-year OS, DFS, recurrence rates, and lymphedema, were analyzed with R software and assessed for bias (Cochrane RoB) and evidence quality (GRADE). The focus was ALND vs. SLNB, alone or with AR, in cT1-T3 BC with 1-2 metastatic SLNs. Thirteen articles from seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, covering 7338 women with a follow-up period of 2.8-10 years. SLNB was associated with a 65 % lower risk of lymphedema than ALND, with no significant differences in the 5-, 8-, or 10-year OS, DFS, or recurrence rates. A meta-analysis comparing micrometastasis and macrometastasis showed no impact on outcomes, indicating that ALND may be unnecessary in either case. Recurrence rates also did not differ between SLNB and ALND, reinforcing SLNB's significantly lower lymphedema risk of SLNB. This systematic review and meta-analysis support SLNB as a safe and effective alternative to ALND in early-stage BC with 1-2 positive SLNs, providing comparable survival and recurrence outcomes, with fewer complications.

13 February 2025 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMarcelo Antonini
Marcelo Antonini
André MattarAndré Mattar
André Mattar
DPDenise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
Denise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
IMIsabela Bastos Maia
Isabela Bastos Maia
MTMarina Diogenes Teixeira
Marina Diogenes Teixeira
JRJuliana Monte Real
Juliana Monte Real
Trastuzumab has significantly improved the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, where its combination with chemotherapy increases the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. This retrospective cohort study assesses the implications of disparities in access to trastuzumab within the Brazilian public healthcare system, focusing on pCR, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic, HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study was conducted in the Hospital Pérola Byington (PEROLA), a public institution, and in the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (HSPE), a private institution. pCR was defined as the absence of residual invasive or in situ tumors in the breast and axillary nodes. OS and DFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for a 5-year period. From 2011 to 2020, 381 patients at PEROLA and 78 at HSPE underwent NAC. Trastuzumab availability was higher at HSPE (83.4 % vs. 60.0 %, p < 0.0001). Use of trastuzumab correlated with significantly higher pCR rates at both the PEROLA (54.3 % vs. 26.4 %, p < 0.0001) and the HSPE (52.7 % vs. 26.4 %, p < 0.0001). HER2-positive patients with pCR at HSPE also had better OS (80 % vs. 61 %, p < 0.0001) and DFS (89 % vs. 67 %, p < 0.0001) compared to those at PEROLA. There were significant differences in the provision of trastuzumab between the public and private healthcare systems, adversely affecting clinical outcomes and patient survival. The current data highlight the pressing need to address equity in cancer treatment to improve prognosis for every patient.

9 September 2022 in Public Health in Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMarcelo Antonini
Marcelo Antonini
DPDenise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
Denise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
GSGisela Rosa Franco Salerno
Gisela Rosa Franco Salerno
AMAna Beatriz Tavares de Moura Brasil Matos
Ana Beatriz Tavares de Moura Brasil Matos
OFOdair Ferraro
Odair Ferraro
JRJuliana Monte Real
Juliana Monte Real
This study aims to evaluate the impact of the Pink October Campaign on the increase in mammographic screening in Brazil. Ecological observational study, based on retrospective data. Brazilian national screening database (DATASUS/SISMAMA/Information System on Breast Cancer) was used as a data source and is publicly available for download and analysis. We report screening numbers and outcome rates from January 2017 to December 2021 comparing statistically (ANOVA test, post-Tukey test), age groups, regions of Brazil, and the four quarters of the year. During the study period, the average number of exams performed monthly over the five years was 137,400.117. An increase in the number of mammograms performed in October was identified, as well as in the two following months, respectively 33%, 39%, and 22%, with statistical significance (p = 0.000) in relation to the three quarters of the year. In addition, in the other months, we found values below the monthly average. Statistical difference was not found in the increase in mammograms considering age groups (p = 0.5) and different regions of the country (p = 0.6). This study showed an increase in mammographic screening in the three months following the Pink October Campaign, so we should intensify similar actions throughout the year and not just in October.

23 September 2023 in BMC Women's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDenise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
Denise Joffily Pereira da Costa Pinheiro
APAna Maria Gomes Pereira
Ana Maria Gomes Pereira
MAMarcelo Antonini
Marcelo Antonini
ISIsabella Maria Albuquerque Salgado
Isabella Maria Albuquerque Salgado
ADAlexandre Torchio Dias
Alexandre Torchio Dias
RLReginaldo Guedes Coelho Lopes
Reginaldo Guedes Coelho Lopes
Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that occurs in women of reproductive age. Much of the treatment involves hormone therapy that suppresses the proliferation of endometriosis lesions.Objective To compare discontinuation rates of pharmacological treatment with estrogen-progestins and progestins medications. The secondary objective is to evaluate the main side effects of these drugs in patients with endometriosis.Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from 330 patients who attended the Hospital of the State Public Servant of São Paulo from August 1999 to September 2020 and received pharmacological treatment for endometriosis. The data were obtained by review of the files of medical appointments with specialized staff.Results The median treatment time was 18 months, ranging from 1 to 168 months, and 177 patients interrupted the proposed treatment. The combined contraceptives with estrogens and progestins were significantly linked to treatment interruption, with a relative risk of 1,99 (p = 0,005). The most important side effects that resulted in treatment interruption were pain persistence (p = 0,043), weight gain (p = 0,017) and spotting (p < 0,001).