Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the gold standard for the axillary evaluation of clinically node-negative early breast cancer. The ACOSOG Z0011 study demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary dissection for limited SLNB disease, with other trials confirming SLNB alone or with axillary radiotherapy (AR) as non-inferior. We followed PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROSPERO. Using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (2010-2024). Outcomes, including 5-, 8-, and 10-year OS, DFS, recurrence rates, and lymphedema, were analyzed with R software and assessed for bias (Cochrane RoB) and evidence quality (GRADE). The focus was ALND vs. SLNB, alone or with AR, in cT1-T3 BC with 1-2 metastatic SLNs. Thirteen articles from seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, covering 7338 women with a follow-up period of 2.8-10 years. SLNB was associated with a 65 % lower risk of lymphedema than ALND, with no significant differences in the 5-, 8-, or 10-year OS, DFS, or recurrence rates. A meta-analysis comparing micrometastasis and macrometastasis showed no impact on outcomes, indicating that ALND may be unnecessary in either case. Recurrence rates also did not differ between SLNB and ALND, reinforcing SLNB's significantly lower lymphedema risk of SLNB. This systematic review and meta-analysis support SLNB as a safe and effective alternative to ALND in early-stage BC with 1-2 positive SLNs, providing comparable survival and recurrence outcomes, with fewer complications.

PURPOSE: A nationwide lockdown was enforced in Brazil starting in March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic when cancer screening activities were reduced. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. METHODS: We extracted data from the medical records of patients age older than 18 years who were diagnosed with BC and started treatment or follow-up in private oncology institutions in Brazil between 2018 and 2021. The primary objective was to compare the stage distribution during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) with a historical prepandemic control cohort (2018-2019). Early BC was defined as stage I-II and advanced disease as stage IV. RESULTS: We collected data for 11,753 patients with an initial diagnosis of BC, with 6,493 patients in the pandemic (2020-2021) and 5,260 patients in the prepandemic period (2018-2019). We observed a lower prevalence of early-stage BC (63.6% v 68.4%) and a higher prevalence of advanced-stage BC (16.9 v 12.7%), after the onset of the pandemic (both P < .01). This pattern was similar for both estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive tumors: significantly decreased in the early stage from 69% to 67% and 68% to 58%, respectively, and a considerable increase in advanced-stage disease from 13% to 15% and 13% to 20%, respectively. For triple-negative BC, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients with advanced-stage disease during the pandemic (17% v 11%). Overall, age 50 years or older and postmenopausal status were associated with a greater risk of advanced stage at diagnosis during the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: We observed a substantial increase in the number of cases of advanced-stage BC in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trastuzumab has significantly improved the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, where its combination with chemotherapy increases the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. This retrospective cohort study assesses the implications of disparities in access to trastuzumab within the Brazilian public healthcare system, focusing on pCR, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic, HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study was conducted in the Hospital Pérola Byington (PEROLA), a public institution, and in the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (HSPE), a private institution. pCR was defined as the absence of residual invasive or in situ tumors in the breast and axillary nodes. OS and DFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for a 5-year period. From 2011 to 2020, 381 patients at PEROLA and 78 at HSPE underwent NAC. Trastuzumab availability was higher at HSPE (83.4 % vs. 60.0 %, p < 0.0001). Use of trastuzumab correlated with significantly higher pCR rates at both the PEROLA (54.3 % vs. 26.4 %, p < 0.0001) and the HSPE (52.7 % vs. 26.4 %, p < 0.0001). HER2-positive patients with pCR at HSPE also had better OS (80 % vs. 61 %, p < 0.0001) and DFS (89 % vs. 67 %, p < 0.0001) compared to those at PEROLA. There were significant differences in the provision of trastuzumab between the public and private healthcare systems, adversely affecting clinical outcomes and patient survival. The current data highlight the pressing need to address equity in cancer treatment to improve prognosis for every patient.

The present paper reports on the local treatment of breast cancer from a historical perspective. A search for articles written in English was made in the Medline and EMBASE databases, and 40 papers were selected. Over the past 10 years, various randomized, controlled clinical trials on the local treatment of breast cancer indicated that patients with the same molecular subtype may receive different individualized surgical treatments aimed at optimizing systemic adjuvant therapy. With a view to retaining the gains made in disease-free and overall survival, surgical techniques have advanced from radical surgery to conservative mastectomies, thus reducing sequelae, while adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies have contributed toward controlling the disease, both distant metastases and local recurrence. Current studies evaluate whether future breast cancer therapy may even succeed in eliminating surgery to the breast and axilla altogether.