Anusha Withana

Dr. Anusha Withana


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
DGDaniel Groeger
Daniel Groeger
JSJürgen Steimle
Jürgen Steimle
C a Figure 1. A Tacttoo rub-on tattoo enables feel-through and high-density tactile output. With less than 35µm in thickness, it closely conforms to fine structures of the skin. Tacttoos can be custom-designed for various body locations and taxel densities, and fabricated using DIY tooling.

19 April 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
ANAditya Shekhar Nittala
Aditya Shekhar Nittala
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
NPNarjes Pourjafarian
Narjes Pourjafarian
JSJürgen Steimle
Jürgen Steimle

16 October 2011
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
YSYuta Sugiura
Yuta Sugiura
GKGota Kakehi
Gota Kakehi
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
CLCalista Lee
Calista Lee
DSDaisuke Sakamoto
Daisuke Sakamoto
TITakeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi
We present the FuwaFuwa sensor module, a round, hand-size, wireless device for measuring the shape deformations of soft objects such as cushions and plush toys. It can be embedded in typical soft objects in the household without complex installation procedures and without spoiling the softness of the object because it requires no physical connection. Six LEDs in the module emit IR light in six orthogonal directions, and six corresponding photosensors measure the reflected light energy. One can easily convert almost any soft object into a touch-input device that can detect both touch position and surface displacement by embedding multiple FuwaFuwa sensor modules in the object. A variety of example applications illustrate the utility of the FuwaFuwa sensor module. An evaluation of the proposed deformation measurement technique confirms its effectiveness.

10 April 2010
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
YSYuta Sugiura
Yuta Sugiura
DSDaisuke Sakamoto
Daisuke Sakamoto
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
MIMasahiko Inami
Masahiko Inami
TITakeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi

16 May 2024 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHossein Moeinzadeh
Hossein Moeinzadeh
KYKen-Tye Yong
Ken-Tye Yong
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
The determination of water quality heavily depends on the selection of parameters recorded from water samples for the water quality index (WQI). Data-driven methods, including machine learning models and statistical approaches, are frequently used to refine the parameter set for four main reasons: reducing cost and uncertainty, addressing the eclipsing problem, and enhancing the performance of models predicting the WQI. Despite their widespread use, there is a noticeable gap in comprehensive reviews that systematically examine previous studies in this area. Such reviews are essential to assess the validity of these objectives and to demonstrate the effectiveness of data-driven methods in achieving these goals. This paper sets out with two primary aims: first, to provide a review of the existing literature on methods for selecting parameters. Second, it seeks to delineate and evaluate the four principal motivations for parameter selection identified in the literature. This manuscript categorizes existing studies into two methodological groups for refining parameters: one focuses on preserving information within the dataset, and another ensures consistent prediction using the full set of parameters. It characterizes each group and evaluates how effectively each approach meets the four predefined objectives. The study presents that the minimal WQI approach, common to both categories, is the only approach that has successfully reduced recording costs. Nonetheless, it notes that simply reducing the number of parameters does not guarantee cost savings. Furthermore, the group of studies classified as preserving information within the dataset has demonstrated potential to decrease the eclipsing problem, whereas studies in the consistent prediction group have not been able to mitigate this issue. Additionally, since data-driven approaches still rely on the initial parameters chosen by experts, they do not eliminate the need for expert judgment. The study further points out that the WQI formula is a straightforward and expedient tool for assessing water quality. Consequently, the paper argues that employing machine learning solely to reduce the number of parameters to enhance WQI prediction is not a standalone solution. Rather, this objective should be integrated with a more comprehensive set of research goals. The critical analysis of research objectives and the characterization of previous studies lay the groundwork for future research. This groundwork will enable subsequent studies to evaluate how their proposed methods can effectively achieve these objectives.

18 April 2015
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
AWAnusha Withana
Anusha Withana
RPRoshan Peiris
Roshan Peiris
NSNipuna Samarasekara
Nipuna Samarasekara
SNSuranga Nanayakkara
Suranga Nanayakkara