Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent types of malignant tumors. It’s vital to explore new biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in CRC lung metastasis through adopting integrated bioinformatics tools. Multiple cohort datasets and databases were integrated to clarify and verify potential key candidate biomarkers and signal transduction pathways in CRC lung metastasis. DAVID, STRING, UALCAN, GEPIA, TIMER, cBioPortal, THE HUMAN PROTEIN ATLAS, GSEA 4.3.2, FUNRICH 3.1.3, and R 4.2.3 were utilized in this study. The enriched biological processes and pathways modulated by the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined with Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The search tool Retrieval of Interacting Genes and Cytoscape were used to construct a protein–protein interaction network among DEGs. Four hundred fifty-nine colorectal primary cancer and lung metastatic gene expression profiles were screened from 3 gene expression profiles (GSE41258, GSE68468, and GSE41568). Forty-one upregulated genes and 8 downregulated genes were identified from these 3 gene expression profiles and verified by the transcriptional levels of hub genes in other GEO datasets and The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Two pathways (immune responses and chemokine receptors bind chemokines), 13 key DEGs, 6 hub genes (MMP3, SFTPD, ABCA3, CLU, APOE, and SPP1), and 2 biomarkers (APOE, SPP1) with significantly prognostic values were screened. Forty-nine DEGs were identified as potential candidate diagnostic biomarkers for patients with CRC lung metastasis in present study. Enrichment analysis indicated that immune responses and chemokine receptors bind chemokines may play a leading role in lung metastasis of CRC, and further studies are needed to validate these findings.

There are few studies on the predictive factors of early recurrence (ER) and late recurrence (LR) of advanced gastric cancer (GC) after curative surgery. Our study aims to explore the independent predictors influencing the prognosis between ER and LR in patients with advanced GC after curative intent surgery respectively. And we will further develop nomograms for prediction of post recurrence survival (PRS). Data of patients with GC who received radical gastrectomy was retrospectively collected. Recurrence was classified into ER and LR according to the 2 years after surgery as the cutoff value. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore significant predictors in our analysis. Then these significant predictors were integrated to construct nomograms. The 1-, 2- and 3-year probabilities of PRS in patients with ER were 30.00%, 16.36% and 11.82%, respectively. In contrast, the late group were 44.68%, 23.40%, and 23.30%, respectively. Low body mass index (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, P = .001), elevated monocytes count (HR = 4.54, P = .003) and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.03, P = .037) at the time of recurrence were risk factors of PRS after ER. Decreased hemoglobin (HR = 0.97, P = .008) and elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.06, P = .045) at the time of recurrence were risk factors of PRS after LR. The calibration curves for probability of 1-, 2-, and 3-year PRS showed excellent predictive effect. Internal validation concordance indexes of PRS were 0.722 and 0.671 for ER and LR respectively. In view of the different predictive factors of ER and LR of GC, the practical predictive model may help clinicians make reasonable decisions.

In this study, we aimed to explore the risk factors influencing post-recurrence survival (PRS) of early recurrence (ER) and late recurrence (LR) in stage advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after radical surgery, respectively, and to develop predictive models in turn. Medical records of 192 AGC patients who recurred after radical gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. They were randomly divided into the training and validation set at a ratio of 2:1. Nomograms were built based on risk factors influencing PRS of ER and LR explored by Cox regression analyses, respectively. Concordance index (C-index) values and calibration curves were used to evaluate predictive power of nomograms. Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m², prealbumin level < 70.1 mg/L, positive lymph nodes ratio ≥ 0.486 and palliative treatment after recurrence were independent risk factors for the prognosis of ER. In contrast, prealbumin level < 170.1 mg/L, CEA ≥ 18.32 μg/L, tumor diameter ≥ 5.5 cm and palliative treatment after recurrence were independent risk factors for the prognosis of LR. The C-index values were 0.801 and 0.772 for ER and LR in the training set, respectively. The calibration curves of validation set showed a C-index value of 0.744 and 0.676 for ER and LR, respectively. Nomograms which were constructed to predict the prognosis of ER and LR of AGC after surgery showed great predictive power and could provide reference for clinicians’ treatment strategies to some extent.

Objective: Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement for the treatment of MBO. Methods: The study was registered in INPLASY (number 202340096). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2023. We selected studies comparing the efficacy of ERFA plus stent placement with stent placement alone. The primary outcomes were pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and stent patency; the secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Results: Eleven studies (four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed a difference in survival time between the two groups (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.73, I² = 40%). However, there were no differences in the duration of stent patency or the incidence of adverse events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.29, I² = 46%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, I² = 29%). Conclusions: ERFA has a significant survival benefit for MBO, but does not increase the risk of adverse events.