Background and Objectives: The treatment of advanced and metastatic lung cancer is multimodal, and it is coordinated by a multidisciplinary team. Anxiety and depression occur frequently in patients with lung cancer, creating considerable discomfort in therapeutic management. At the same time, these psychoemotional symptoms affect the patients’ quality of life. Objective: This research seeks to identify correlations both between anxiety and depression and the patients’ performance statuses, as well as between anxiety and depression and the type of treatment: radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), immunotherapy and palliative care. Materials and Methods: The study evaluated 105 patients with lung cancer from two oncologic centers. Patients were assessed for anxiety and depression using the questionnaire Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a self-report rating scale of 14 items. It measures anxiety and depression, and has two subscales. There are seven items for each subscale. There are 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. For each subscale, the score is the sum of the seven items, ranging from 0 to 21. Results: The most powerful correlation with statistical significance was observed between the IT type of treatment (immunotherapy) and the normal level of anxiety, PC = 0.82 (p < 0.001) as well as the normal level of depression. Palliative treatment was correlated with anxiety and depression, both borderline and abnormal. For ECOG 3–4 performance status and abnormal anxiety, respectively, abnormal depression was significantly associated. Also, continuous hospitalization was associated with abnormal anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Early assessments of anxiety and depression are necessary in patients with advanced and metastatic lung cancer, with unfavorable performance status, who have been admitted to continuous hospitalization, and who require palliative care.

Introduction and Literature Review: Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed in an advanced/metastatic stage, as it is a very aggressive type of cancer. The prognosis of pancreatic cancer is extremely unfavorable. The mean survival rate for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is 3–6 months. Stage IV pancreatic cancer has a five-year survival rate of 1.3% to 13%. This article presents recent data regarding the oncologic management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Case presentation: We present the case of a female patient who was 49 years old at the time of diagnosis, in June 2021. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic neoplasm (due to liver metastases). The diagnosis was made by histopathological and immunohistochemical examination, which corroborated imaging investigations. The patient underwent four lines of chemotherapy between July 2021 and July 2024, undergoing partial response to the disease. The patient is a long-term survivor of metastatic pancreatic cancer (3 years in July 2024). Discussions: the peculiarity of this case is long-term survival (3 years and a month at the date when this article is being written) in a patient with pancreatic cancer and liver metastases. Conclusions: histopathological type, good performance status, CEA, and CA tumor markers 19.9 within normal limits may be favorable prognostic factors for long-term survival in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

Introduction: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of cancer with a poor prognosis. The two-year survival rate is 8% of all cases. Case presentation: We present the case of a male patient who was 50 years old at the time of diagnosis in May 2022. He was diagnosed with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, treated with immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy (Durvalumab in combination with Etoposide plus Carboplatin) as a first-line treatment, followed by maintenance immunotherapy. In December 2023, a PET-CT scan revealed progressive disease with multiple metastases. Chemotherapy was reinitiated with Etoposide plus Cisplatin in January 2024. After two cycles of chemotherapy, the patient developed post-chemotherapy anemia, for which treatment with Epoetinum alpha was initiated. Chemotherapy was continued for another five cycles, until May 2024, with the maintenance of hemoglobin at a level within 9.9 mg/dL–11 mg/dL. Upon assessment at the end of May 2024, the patient presented an ECOG = 2 performance status, with a moderate general state, moderate-intensity fatigue, no pain, no anxiety or depression and no dyspnea. Discussions, Literature Review and Conclusions: Reinitiating chemotherapy after the failure of maintenance immunotherapy may be an option in patients with SCLC. Epoetinum allows oncological treatment by preventing chemotherapy-induced anemia.

We present the case of a patient who was diagnosed in 2018 with nodular Malignant Melanoma (MM) without BRAF V 600 mutations stage 3 C (pT4b pN1a M0), and who underwent adjuvant citokines treatment with Interferon alpha 2b-48 weeks. Immunotherapy was initiated in January 2021 for lung and lymph node metastases. In June 2021, there was a partial response of the lung and lymph node metastases, but there was also progression to brain metastases. Immunotherapy was continued and Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed. In September 2023, the imaging investigations revealed a favorable response, with no lesions suggestive of secondary determinations. The combination of Radiotherapy (RT) and Immunotherapy (IT) with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) has an abscopal effect. There is a coordinated action in the combination of RT and IT in order to obtain a common result, with the antitumor effect being greater than if RT or IT acted separately.

Background: Advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the last 5 years (new techniques in radiotherapy, including stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, new targeted therapies and advances in immunotherapy) have increased the survival rates of patients diagnosed with this disease. Methods: Our study refers to a patient diagnosed in July 2017 with stage IV A lung cancer, cT3 N3 M1b (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, EGFR, ALK and PDL 1 negative), who underwent five lines of treatment and who has, at the time of writing this article (March 2025), a very good performance status, currently undergoing maintenance chemotherapy. Results: The results obtained confirm the revolutionary role of immunotherapy, but also the importance of chemotherapy and external radiotherapy, suggesting the synergistic effect between these three therapies. We also performed a literature review, highlighting the resistance to immunotherapy, rechallenge with immunotherapy, progression of metastatic NSCLC after first-line chemo-immunotherapy and the role of chemotherapy in line II and III after progression of NSCLC to immunotherapy. Conclusions: Results of studies evaluating new agents and their combinations, along with analysis of the mechanisms of evolution of primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy are awaited, with the aim of selective and personalized treatment options to improve the survival and the quality of life for this category of patients.

Background and Objectives: The management of patients with multiple primary malignancies (MPMs) is performed by a multidisciplinary team whose purpose is to individualize the treatment plan and to determine the strategies that will improve the patient’s care. The most commonly encountered malignancies are prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, lung, and bladder cancer. Prostate cancer may be synchronous or metachronous with other cancer sites. The risk factors for MPMs are viral infections, genetic factors, environmental factors, and oncological treatments (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 26 patients with either synchronous or metachronous prostate cancer with another cancer site, registered at “Sf. Apostol Andrei” County Emergency Hospital in Galati, Romania, over a 15-year time interval (2010–2025).This paper presents the clinical and therapeutic characteristics and the staging of synchronous/metachronous cancer sites. The stage of the disease was analyzed along with the time interval between the first cancer site and the second or the third cancer site occurrence; the undergone treatment was a multimodal one. Results: This paper discusses the analyzed cases and presents the articles published in the specialty literature regarding the stage of synchronous or metachronous prostate cancer with one or more cancer sites. The most common sites are presented, along with the importance of follow-up and a complex therapeutic management depending on the stage of primary tumors. Conclusions: This series represents a cohort study regarding synchronous/metachronous prostate cancer with other cancer sites (26 cases over a 15-year time period). This case series adds more experience to the already existing experience in the literature, providing guidelines to clinicians in order to make the right decisions regarding the treatment of this disease.