This article aims to conduct a literature review to gain insight into point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). PoCUS is a rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and radiation-free imaging modality that can be used in stable and unstable patients. PoCUS can be performed parallel to physical examination, resuscitation, and stabilization; repeated exams in critical patients are essential for improving sensitivity. The review highlights how PoCUS, which was initially used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in trauma patients, has developed into a life-saving diagnostic tool that could be utilized by treating physicians during various stages of diagnosis, resuscitation, operation, and postoperative critical care when managing sick patients. The review also notes the barriers to the widespread uptake of PoCUS in general internal medicine and the recent commercial availability of "pocket" or handheld probes that have made PoCUS more readily available. This review concludes that adopting a focused binary decision-making approach can maximize PoCUS's value in many clinical settings, including emergency departments, intensive care units, and operation theatres. Overall, the review emphasizes the importance of awareness of common indications, limitations, and strengths of this evolving and promising technology to determine its future trajectory: Providing comprehensive PoCUS training within internal medicine curriculums and supporting trainers to do so.

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are considered to be a major risk factor for cardiovascular disorders (CVDs). In 2019, as per the National Drug Use and Health Survey (NSDUH), 20.4 million American adults suffered from a substance use disorder. The main purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of several SUDs (cigarette smoking, cigar, smokeless tobacco, marijuana, cocaine/heroin/methamphetamine, and injectable illegal drug) amongst patients diagnosed with various CVDs (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and coronary heart disease). Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2013 to 2018, and respondents with CVDs were recognized using questionnaires. Different SUDs (active history) were identified amongst the adult population with a history of CVDs and without CVDs. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square and unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney test to identify characteristics of respondents with CVDs and mix effect multivariable logistic regression models were generated to find the prevalence of SUDs amongst the CVD population. Datasets were analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software, and the p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 263465 respondents, 7.90% respondents were diagnosed with CVDs and were noted to be in older age group (median age: 69 years). CVDs were more prevalent amongst 66-years and above (19.36% vs. 45-64 years: 6.81% vs. 18-44 years: 1.17%), male (10.40% vs. female: 5.66%), Non-Hispanic White race (10.92%), and lower annual household income population (<$25000 vs. >$100,000:12.21% vs. 4.01%) (p<0.0001). When compared with respondents without a history of CVDs, respondents with a history of CVDs were noted to be more prevalent with a concurrent diagnosis of hypertension (85.98% vs. 79.53%), hypercholesterolemia (68.78% vs. 34.54%), diabetes (37.86% vs. 12.70%), stroke (17.4% vs. 2.71%), and congestive heart failure (28.80% vs. 1.31%) (p<0.0001). History of CVDs were more prevalent amongst the respondents using marijuana (overall 53.14%; CVD vs. no-CVD 65.42% vs. 52.81%; p<0.0001), cigarette smoking (60.47% vs. 40.41%; p<0.0001), cigar-smoking (47.05% vs. 35.58%; p<0.0001), methamphetamine/cocaine/heroin (23.82% vs. 16.71%; p<0.0001), smokeless tobacco use (18.53% vs. 14.59%; p<0.0001), and injectable illegal drug use (4.67% vs. 2.43%; p<0.0001). Additionally, prevalence of history of CVDs was almost double in respondents using cigarettes without filters (2.28% vs. 1.10%; p<0.0001) when compared with respondents using cigarettes with filters. Conclusion: Respondents who used marijuana or hashish, injectable illegal drugs, and e-cigars were at elevated risk for cardiovascular disorders. Providing situational awareness and offering a good support system can be a strategy to prevent the development of cardiovascular disorders among substance users.

Globally, stroke is one of the top ten causes of death. The incidence of stroke in patients aged 44 years and younger was noted to have risen over the past three decades. This rise in stroke diagnosis among young adults could be attributed to multiple reasons, including the rising prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, substance use disorders (SUDs), etc. This study's primary aim was to evaluate the prevalence of stroke in the US population and the prevalence of SUDs amongst patients with a prior history of stroke. The secondary aim was to evaluate the association between Stroke and SUDs. Our population was obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between the years 2013 to 2018. We identified respondents diagnosed with stroke using the questionnaire and the history of various SUDs amongst this population. The data were analyzed using SAS software (Version 9.4). We performed univariate analysis using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney test, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Two hundred sixty-four thousand seven hundred forty (264,740) respondents were included in this study, and 10435 (3.94%) respondents were noted to have a history of stroke. The population subset with a stroke diagnosis was older (68 years vs. 51 years). Higher prevalence was noted among the female sex (52.14% females vs. 47.86% males), Non-Hispanic white ethnicity, followed by Non-Hispanic black & then other Hispanics (47.56% vs.25.47% vs. 7.82%), and those belonging to a lower annual household income of $0-$25,000 and $25,000-$65,000 ( 46.61% vs. 35.93% ). (p<0.0001). After adjusting for socio-demographics and coexisting comorbidities, e-cigarette [OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 2.03-2.03], cocaine [OR: 1.54; 95%CI:1.54-1.54], heroin [OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.83-1.83], marijuana or hashish [OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01], were observed to have an association with higher odds of stroke than the population without a history of using these illicit drugs. Among respondents with a history of stroke, the use of cocaine was most prevalent, followed by marijuana/hashish, heroin, e-cigarettes, and injecting illegal drugs. The odds of having a stroke were two times higher in the population using an e-cigarette and higher among those using heroin, cocaine, and marijuana/ hashish. The Government should plan policy changes to treat SUDs in the USA, which could help reduce the stroke burden. Recall that bias and geographic variations in response rate by participants of the study were the limitations of our survey-based study.

Francisella tularensis is a re-emerging organism causing more significant outbreaks of tularemia and fear of bioterrorism. It can be challenging to recognize tularemia due to its variable presentation, especially in low-incidence areas. Physicians must be mindful of this life-threatening infectious disease and consider it a differential diagnosis in patients with fever of unknown origin. We encountered a case of pulmonary tularemia with a unique presentation of severe headache and fever.

Background: Both valvular heart disease (VHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist. AF is an important cause of arrhythmias with a definitive cardiovascular morbidity. The use of either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs/warfarin) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (also known as new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)) has been the mainstay for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with VHD and/or AF, and this has been broadly discussed. However, there are limited studies on anticoagulation therapy for patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF). The main aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes (stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding) following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst patients with VAF. Methods: We identified clinical trials and observational studies published in the last 10 years. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with valvular atrial fibrillation following DOAC vs. VKA treatment. Data evaluation was performed using Review Manager 5.4; the endpoints were stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst VAF patients. Risk ratios (RR) were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals. Using random effects models, forest plots were obtained. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the I² statistic. Results: Eight studies were included in this metanalysis, and a total of fifteen thousand two hundred and fifteen patients (DOAC (8732) and VKA (6483)) were pooled. We found a significant risk reduction in stroke–vascular events when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64–0.90, p = 0.002). A total of 14862 patients (DOAC (8561) and VKA (6301)) were pooled from a total of six studies for intracranial bleeding. We found a significant risk reduction in terms of intracranial bleeding when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24–0.77, p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: When compared to VKAs, DOAC agents were found to have less risk of stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding. Further prospective studies are essential to establish the efficacy and safety of DOAC agents in patients with various subtypes of VAF.