Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a poorly understood gastrointestinal disorder that affects a significant percentage of the population and has a strong negative effect on the quality of life. The lack of known pathophysiologic mechanisms has made finding effective treatment strategies difficult. One of the common recommendations by clinicians is a trial of a lactose-free diet. We have wondered if there was sufficient evidence in the currently available literature to support such a recommendation. We have also looked into other possible relationships between malabsorption syndromes and IBS. All the articles used for this review have been found in the PubMed database. We have taken into consideration the possibility that there may be both genetic differences and differences in the gut microbiome between populations living in different geographic regions. Therefore, we have included articles from different geographic regions to increase the generalizability of the findings. While there is a plethora of evidence that IBS patients commonly report milk intolerance, we have not found any conclusive evidence to suggest an objective link between IBS and any known malabsorption syndromes, including lactose malabsorption. Furthermore, trials of lactase supplementation have not led to clinical benefit. We concluded that there was no evidence to support routinely recommending a lactose-free diet for patients diagnosed with IBS, but including hydrogen breath testing in routine workup of IBS is a reasonable clinical decision. Ultimately, we believe that more clinical trials and chemical studies of the feces are needed to determine the pathophysiology and explore possible dietary recommendations for patients with IBS.

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are considered to be a major risk factor for cardiovascular disorders (CVDs). In 2019, as per the National Drug Use and Health Survey (NSDUH), 20.4 million American adults suffered from a substance use disorder. The main purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of several SUDs (cigarette smoking, cigar, smokeless tobacco, marijuana, cocaine/heroin/methamphetamine, and injectable illegal drug) amongst patients diagnosed with various CVDs (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and coronary heart disease). Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2013 to 2018, and respondents with CVDs were recognized using questionnaires. Different SUDs (active history) were identified amongst the adult population with a history of CVDs and without CVDs. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square and unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney test to identify characteristics of respondents with CVDs and mix effect multivariable logistic regression models were generated to find the prevalence of SUDs amongst the CVD population. Datasets were analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software, and the p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 263465 respondents, 7.90% respondents were diagnosed with CVDs and were noted to be in older age group (median age: 69 years). CVDs were more prevalent amongst 66-years and above (19.36% vs. 45-64 years: 6.81% vs. 18-44 years: 1.17%), male (10.40% vs. female: 5.66%), Non-Hispanic White race (10.92%), and lower annual household income population (<$25000 vs. >$100,000:12.21% vs. 4.01%) (p<0.0001). When compared with respondents without a history of CVDs, respondents with a history of CVDs were noted to be more prevalent with a concurrent diagnosis of hypertension (85.98% vs. 79.53%), hypercholesterolemia (68.78% vs. 34.54%), diabetes (37.86% vs. 12.70%), stroke (17.4% vs. 2.71%), and congestive heart failure (28.80% vs. 1.31%) (p<0.0001). History of CVDs were more prevalent amongst the respondents using marijuana (overall 53.14%; CVD vs. no-CVD 65.42% vs. 52.81%; p<0.0001), cigarette smoking (60.47% vs. 40.41%; p<0.0001), cigar-smoking (47.05% vs. 35.58%; p<0.0001), methamphetamine/cocaine/heroin (23.82% vs. 16.71%; p<0.0001), smokeless tobacco use (18.53% vs. 14.59%; p<0.0001), and injectable illegal drug use (4.67% vs. 2.43%; p<0.0001). Additionally, prevalence of history of CVDs was almost double in respondents using cigarettes without filters (2.28% vs. 1.10%; p<0.0001) when compared with respondents using cigarettes with filters. Conclusion: Respondents who used marijuana or hashish, injectable illegal drugs, and e-cigars were at elevated risk for cardiovascular disorders. Providing situational awareness and offering a good support system can be a strategy to prevent the development of cardiovascular disorders among substance users.

Post-traumatic seizures (PTS) have become an emerging challenge for neurologists worldwide with the rise of brain injuries. Trauma can lead to various outcomes, ranging from naive spasms to debilitating post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). In this article, we will explore the pathogenesis of convulsions following a concussion. We will look at multiple studies to explain the various structural, metabolic, and inflammatory changes leading to seizures. Additionally, we will explore the association between severity and location of injury and PTE. PTE's pathophysiology is not entirely implicit, and we are still in the dark as to which anti-epileptic drugs will be useful in circumventing these attacks. The purpose of this narrative review is to explain the post-traumatic brain changes in detail so that such attacks can be either thwarted or treated more resourcefully in the future.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a standard variant that is present in 25% of the whole adult population. In a certain population, PFO can lead to cerebrovascular accidents. Mechanism of cerebrovascular accidents can be by paradoxical embolization from the right circulation or in situ thrombosis. Diagnosis of a PFO-responsible cerebrovascular accident is based on a thorough work-up to exclude other possible etiologies and detect PFO on trans-thoracic or trans-esophageal echocardiography with bubble study and/or Doppler. Over the last few years, multiple studies have supported that percutaneous PFO closure is superior to medical therapy in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular accidents. However, numerous adverse events have been linked to PFO closure devices in general compared to medical therapy as new-onset atrial fibrillation, residual shunt, device-related thrombus, bleeding, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and inter-atrial septal erosions. Amplatzer device is one of the PFO occluder devices approved by the FDA. Device-related adverse events have been addressed by comparing the Amplatzer device with other PFO occluder devices. Based on the new data, we expect to see more complications related to PFO closure in the coming few years. We reviewed different studies that looked at the PFO closure-related complications and the trials comparing adverse events in the Amplatzer PFO occluder device compared to other devices. Amplatzer PFO occluder device is either superior or non-statistically different from other PFO occluder devices related to new-onset atrial fibrillation and residual shunt. More studies are needed to address the other less common adverse events. Since many of the device-related complications appear many years after device placement, a long-term follow-up is recommended.

Background: Both valvular heart disease (VHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist. AF is an important cause of arrhythmias with a definitive cardiovascular morbidity. The use of either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs/warfarin) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (also known as new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)) has been the mainstay for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with VHD and/or AF, and this has been broadly discussed. However, there are limited studies on anticoagulation therapy for patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF). The main aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcomes (stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding) following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst patients with VAF. Methods: We identified clinical trials and observational studies published in the last 10 years. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with valvular atrial fibrillation following DOAC vs. VKA treatment. Data evaluation was performed using Review Manager 5.4; the endpoints were stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding following DOAC and VKA treatment amongst VAF patients. Risk ratios (RR) were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals. Using random effects models, forest plots were obtained. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the I² statistic. Results: Eight studies were included in this metanalysis, and a total of fifteen thousand two hundred and fifteen patients (DOAC (8732) and VKA (6483)) were pooled. We found a significant risk reduction in stroke–vascular events when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64–0.90, p = 0.002). A total of 14862 patients (DOAC (8561) and VKA (6301)) were pooled from a total of six studies for intracranial bleeding. We found a significant risk reduction in terms of intracranial bleeding when using DOACs in comparison with using VKAs (pooled RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24–0.77, p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: When compared to VKAs, DOAC agents were found to have less risk of stroke–vascular events and intracranial bleeding. Further prospective studies are essential to establish the efficacy and safety of DOAC agents in patients with various subtypes of VAF.