Janki Mihir Desai

Dr. Janki Mihir Desai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAniruddha Sunil Karve
Aniruddha Sunil Karve
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
SGSidharth N. Gadgil
Sidharth N. Gadgil
NDNimita Dave
Nimita Dave
TWTrisha Wise-Draper
Trisha Wise-Draper
PDPankaj Desai
Pankaj Desai
A glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive, infiltrative, and treatment-resistant malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS). The current standard of care for GBMs include maximally safe tumor resection, followed by concurrent adjuvant radiation treatment and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), which was approved by the FDA in 2005 based on a marginal increase (~2 months) in overall survival (OS) levels. This treatment approach, while initially successful in containing and treating GBM, almost invariably fails to prevent tumor recurrence. In addition to the limited therapeutic benefit, TMZ also causes debilitating adverse events (AEs) that significantly impact the quality of life of GBM patients. Some of the most common AEs include hematologic (e.g., thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia) and non-hematologic (e.g., nausea, vomiting, constipation, dizziness) toxicities. Recurrent GBMs are often resistant to TMZ and other DNA-damaging agents. Thus, there is an urgent need to devise strategies to potentiate TMZ activity, to overcome drug resistance, and to reduce dose-dependent AEs. Here, we analyze major mechanisms of the TMZ resistance-mediated intracellular signaling activation of DNA repair pathways and the overexpression of drug transporters. We review some of the approaches investigated to counteract these mechanisms of resistance to TMZ, including the use of chemosensitizers and drug delivery strategies to enhance tumoral drug exposure.

18 October 2019 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGShuchi Gulati
Shuchi Gulati
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
SPSarah M. Palackdharry
Sarah M. Palackdharry
JMJohn C. Morris
John C. Morris
ZZZheng Zhu
Zheng Zhu
TWTrisha Wise-Draper
Trisha Wise-Draper

17 September 2026 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFei Tang
Fei Tang
YZYifei Zhang
Yifei Zhang
MEMohamed Elmeliegy
Mohamed Elmeliegy
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
YWYow‐Ming Wang
Yow‐Ming Wang
ZXZhenhua Xu
Zhenhua Xu

16 April 2026 in Clinical Drug Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
ECEkram Ahmed Chowdhury
Ekram Ahmed Chowdhury
IAIzna Ali
Izna Ali
CLChristine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee
JSJeffrey M. Schmidt
Jeffrey M. Schmidt
NMNael M. Mostafa
Nael M. Mostafa
Limnetrelvir is an oral inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) and was developed with the aim of achieving broad-spectrum efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. The aim of this work was to evaluate potential CYP3A4 drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of limnetrelvir. In two phase 1, open-label studies, limnetrelvir was evaluated for DDIs with midazolam (Study 1), a CYP3A4 substrate, and itraconazole (Study 2), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Study 1 (N = 24) consisted of two parts (Studies 1A and 1B), each with two periods (Periods 1 and 2), and Study 2 (N = 12) consisted of one part with two periods. In Study 1A, 12 healthy adult participants received midazolam (1 mg) on Period 1 Day 1 and Period 2 Day 10 and limnetrelvir 400 mg once daily (QD) on Period 2 Days 1-10. In Study 1B, an additional 12 healthy adult participants received midazolam (1 mg) on Period 1 Day 1 and Period 2 Day 5 and limnetrelvir 200 mg QD on Period 2 Days 1-5. In Study 2, 12 participants received limnetrelvir (50 mg) and itraconazole (200 mg twice daily on Day 1 and QD on Days 2 to 6 in Period 2), with limnetrelvir administered as a single dose on Period 1 Day 1 and Period 2 Day 4. All study drugs were administered orally. Serial blood samples were collected and analyzed for drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined with noncompartmental methods. Coadministration of limnetrelvir increased the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) of midazolam by ~ 2.4- to 2.6-fold and ~ 4.6- to 4.3-fold, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite, 1-OH-midazolam, demonstrated a decrease in Cmax by ~ 0.66-fold at Day 5 and ~ 0.96-fold at Day 10, while overall AUC remained stable at both time points. No clinically significant differences in CYP3A4 inhibition after 5 days and 10 days of limnetrelvir administration were observed. Limnetrelvir Cmax and AUCinf increased by ~ 1.7- and ~ 3.6-fold, respectively, when coadministered with itraconazole, suggesting that limnetrelvir is a moderately sensitive substrate of CYP3A4. Limnetrelvir was found to be a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate, suggesting that dosing adjustment or careful monitoring may be necessary when coadministered with medications highly metabolized by CYP3A4 or with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors to ensure safe and effective treatment. NCT05691699, NCT05895266. Date of registration: 01/09/2023, 05/31/2023.