Pankaj Desai

Pankaj Desai


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2017 in Targeted Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWTrisha M. Wise-Draper
Trisha M. Wise-Draper
GMGanesh Moorthy
Ganesh Moorthy
MSMohamad A. Salkeni
Mohamad A. Salkeni
NKNagla Abdel Karim
Nagla Abdel Karim
HTHala Elnakat Thomas
Hala Elnakat Thomas
JMJohn Morris
John Morris
Background The combination of everolimus and the imidazoquinoline derivative, BEZ235 (dactolisib), a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, demonstrated synergy in a preclinical model. Objective To establish clinical feasibility, a phase Ib dose-escalation trial investigating safety and pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with advanced tumors was performed. Patients and Methods BEZ235 was orally administered daily in escalating doses of 200, 400, and 800 mg along with everolimus at 2.5 mg daily in 28-day cycles. Nineteen patients were enrolled. Adverse events and tumor responses were evaluated using CTCAE v4.0 and RECIST 1.1, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Results Common toxicities observed included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and elevated liver enzymes. No confirmed responses were observed. BEZ235 pharmacokinetics exhibited dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC0-24 over the three doses, with high inter-individual variability. Non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic-based simulations indicated significant increases in everolimus Cmax and AUC0-24 on day 28 and decreased clearance to 13.41 L/hr. Conclusions The combination of BEZ235 and everolimus demonstrated limited efficacy and tolerance. BEZ235 systemic exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner while oral bioavailability was quite low, which may be related to gastrointestinal-specific toxicity. The changes in steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus with BEZ235 highlight potential drug–drug interactions when these two drugs are administered together. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01508104

1 May 2002 in Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPankaj Desai
Pankaj Desai
SNSrikanth C. Nallani
Srikanth C. Nallani
RSRucha S. Sane
Rucha S. Sane
LMLinda B. Moore
Linda B. Moore
BGBryan J. Goodwin
Bryan J. Goodwin
ABArthur R. Buckley
Arthur R. Buckley
Tamoxifen is a widely utilized antiestrogen in the treatment and chemoprevention of breast cancer. Clinical studies document that tamoxifen administration markedly enhances the systemic elimination of other drugs. Additionally, tamoxifen enhances its own clearance following repeated dosing. The mechanisms that underlie these clinically important events remain unresolved. Here, we report that tamoxifen and its metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen markedly induce cytochrome P450 3A4, a drug-metabolizing enzyme of central importance, in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. Tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (1–10 μM) significantly increased the CYP3A4 expression and activity (measured as the rate of testosterone 6β-hydroxylation). Maximal induction was achieved at the 5 μM level. At this level, tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen caused a 1.5- to 3.3-fold (mean, 2.1-fold) and 3.4- to 17-fold (mean, 7.5-fold) increase in the CYP3A4 activity, respectively. In comparison, rifampicin treatment resulted in a 6- to 16-fold (mean, 10.5-fold) increase. We also observed corresponding increase in the CYP3A4 immunoreactive protein and mRNA levels. Furthermore, tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen efficaciously activated the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR; also known as the steroid xenobiotic receptor), a key regulator ofCYP3A4 expression. The efficacy of tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen relative to rifampicin for hPXR activation was ∼30 and 60%, respectively. Our results indicate that the mechanism of tamoxifen-mediated alteration in drug clearance pathways in humans may involve CYP3A4 induction by the parent drug and/or its metabolite. Furthermore, the CYP3A4 induction may be a result of hPXR activation. These findings have important implications for optimizing the use of tamoxifen and in the development of newer antiestrogens.

12 February 2021 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NONicole Oatman
Nicole Oatman
NDNupur Dasgupta
Nupur Dasgupta
PAPriyanka Arora
Priyanka Arora
KCKwangmin Choi
Kwangmin Choi
MGMruniya V. Gawali
Mruniya V. Gawali
Biplab DasguptaBiplab Dasgupta
Biplab Dasgupta
Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms determine SCD inhibitor sensitivity and acquired resistance through FOSB in cancer.

25 November 2003 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSrikanth C. Nallani
Srikanth C. Nallani
TGTracy A. Glauser
Tracy A. Glauser
NHNiresh Hariparsad
Niresh Hariparsad
KSKenneth Setchell
Kenneth Setchell
DBDonna J. Buckley
Donna J. Buckley
PDPankaj Desai
Pankaj Desai
Summary:  Purpose: In clinical studies, topiramate (TPM) was shown to cause a dose‐dependent increase in the clearance of ethinyl estradiol. We hypothesized that this interaction results from induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 by TPM. Accordingly, we investigated whether TPM induces CYP3A4 in primary human hepatocytes and activates the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR), a nuclear receptor that serves as a regulator of CYP3A4 transcription. Methods: Human hepatocytes were treated for 72 h with TPM (10, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μM) and known inducers, phenobarbital (PB; 2 mM), and rifampicin (10 μM). The rate of testosterone 6β‐hydroxylation by hepatocytes served as a marker for CYP3A4 activity. The CYP3A4‐specific protein and mRNA levels were determined by using Western and Northern blot analyses, respectively. The hPXR activation was assessed with cell‐based reporter gene assay. Results: Compared with controls, TPM (50–500 μM)–treated hepatocytes exhibited a considerable increase in the CYP3A4 activity (1. 6‐ to 8.2‐fold), protein levels (4.6‐ to 17.3‐fold), and mRNA levels (1.9‐ to 13.3‐fold). Comparatively, rifampicin (10 μM) effected 14.5‐, 25.3‐, and a 20.3‐fold increase in CYP3A4 activity, immunoreactive protein levels, and mRNA levels, respectively. TPM (50–500 μM) caused 1.3‐ to 3‐fold activation of the hPXR, whereas rifampicin (10 μM) caused a 6‐fold activation. Conclusions: The observed induction of CYP3A4 by TPM, especially at the higher concentrations, provides a potential mechanistic explanation of the reported increase in the ethinyl estradiol clearance by TPM. It also is suggestive of other potential interactions when high‐dose TPM therapy is used.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAniruddha Sunil Karve
Aniruddha Sunil Karve
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
SGSidharth N. Gadgil
Sidharth N. Gadgil
NDNimita Dave
Nimita Dave
TWTrisha Wise-Draper
Trisha Wise-Draper
PDPankaj Desai
Pankaj Desai
A glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive, infiltrative, and treatment-resistant malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS). The current standard of care for GBMs include maximally safe tumor resection, followed by concurrent adjuvant radiation treatment and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), which was approved by the FDA in 2005 based on a marginal increase (~2 months) in overall survival (OS) levels. This treatment approach, while initially successful in containing and treating GBM, almost invariably fails to prevent tumor recurrence. In addition to the limited therapeutic benefit, TMZ also causes debilitating adverse events (AEs) that significantly impact the quality of life of GBM patients. Some of the most common AEs include hematologic (e.g., thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia) and non-hematologic (e.g., nausea, vomiting, constipation, dizziness) toxicities. Recurrent GBMs are often resistant to TMZ and other DNA-damaging agents. Thus, there is an urgent need to devise strategies to potentiate TMZ activity, to overcome drug resistance, and to reduce dose-dependent AEs. Here, we analyze major mechanisms of the TMZ resistance-mediated intracellular signaling activation of DNA repair pathways and the overexpression of drug transporters. We review some of the approaches investigated to counteract these mechanisms of resistance to TMZ, including the use of chemosensitizers and drug delivery strategies to enhance tumoral drug exposure.

18 October 2019 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGShuchi Gulati
Shuchi Gulati
JDJanki Mihir Desai
Janki Mihir Desai
SPSarah M. Palackdharry
Sarah M. Palackdharry
JMJohn C. Morris
John C. Morris
ZZZheng Zhu
Zheng Zhu
TWTrisha Wise-Draper
Trisha Wise-Draper