Bogdan Enescu

Dr. Bogdan Enescu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 February 2015 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTThessa Tormann
Thessa Tormann
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu
JWJochen Woessner
Jochen Woessner
SWStefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer

28 February 2013 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMatteo Spada
Matteo Spada
TTT. Tormann
T. Tormann
SWS. Wiemer
S. Wiemer
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu

1 September 2009 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWL. Wang
L. Wang
RWR. Wang
R. Wang
FRF. Roth
F. Roth
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu
SHS. Hainzl
S. Hainzl
SESemih Ergintav
Semih Ergintav

21 December 2018 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGL. Gulia
L. Gulia
ARAntonio Pio Rinaldi
Antonio Pio Rinaldi
TTT. Tormann
T. Tormann
Gianfranco VannucciGianfranco Vannucci
Gianfranco Vannucci
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu
SWS. Wiemer
S. Wiemer
A systematic decay of the aftershock rate over time is one of the most fundamental empirical laws in Earth science. However, the equally fundamental effect of a mainshock on the size distribution of subsequent earthquakes has still not been quantified today and is therefore not used in earthquake hazard assessment. We apply a stacking approach to well‐recorded earthquake sequences to extract this effect. Immediately after a mainshock, the mean size distribution of events, orbvalue, increases by 20–30%, considerably decreasing the chance of subsequent larger events. This increase is strongest in the immediate vicinity of the mainshock, decreasing rapidly with distance but only gradually over time. We present a model that explains these observations as a consequence of the stress changes in the surrounding area caused by the mainshocks slip. Our results have substantial implications for how seismic risk during earthquake sequences is assessed.

14 July 2016 in Earth, Planets and Space
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYuji Yagi
Yuji Yagi
RORyo Okuwaki
Ryo Okuwaki
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu
AKAmato Kasahara
Amato Kasahara
AMAyumu Miyakawa
Ayumu Miyakawa
MOMakoto Otsubo
Makoto Otsubo
We constructed the rupture process model for the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake from broadband teleseismic body waveforms (P-waves) by using a novel waveform inversion method that takes into account the uncertainty of Green’s function. The estimated source parameters are: seismic moment = 5.1 × 1019 Nm (Mw = 7.1), fault length = 40 km, and fault width = 15 km. The mainshock rupture mainly propagated northeastward from the epicenter, for about 30 km, along an active strike-slip fault. The rupture propagation of the mainshock decelerated and terminated near the southwest side of the Aso volcano; the aftershock activity was low around the northeastern edge of the major slip area. Our results suggest that the rupture process of the mainshock and the distribution of aftershocks were influenced by the high-temperature area around the magma chamber of Mt. Aso.

5 June 2014 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYuji Yagi
Yuji Yagi
RORyo Okuwaki
Ryo Okuwaki
BEBogdan Enescu
Bogdan Enescu
SHShiro Hirano
Shiro Hirano
YYYuta Yamagami
Yuta Yamagami
TKTakuya Komoro
Takuya Komoro
The rupture process of the 2014 Iquique, Chile earthquake is inverted from teleseismic P wave data applying a novel formulation that takes into account the uncertainty of Green's function, which has been a major error source in waveform inversion. The estimated seismic moment is 1.5 × 1021 Nm (Mw = 8.1), associated with a 140 km long and 140 km wide fault rupture along the plate interface. The source process is characterized by unilateral rupture propagation. During the first 20 s, the dynamic rupture front propagated from the hypocenter to the large asperity located about 50 km southward, crossing a remarkably active foreshock area at high velocity (of about 3.0 km/s), but small and irregular seismic moment release rate. Our result may suggest that the 20 s long initial phase was influenced by the stress drop due to the foreshock activity near the main shock hypocenter. Moreover, the 2 week long swarm‐like foreshock activity migrating roughly at 5 km/day toward the main shock hypocenter, and possibly associated slow slip, contributed to the stress accumulation prior to the Mw 8.1 megaquake. The main shock initial rupture phase might have triggered the rupture of the large asperity, which had large fracture energy.