Background: Nocturnal hypoxaemia measured as the percentage of total sleep time spent with saturation below 90% (TST90%) may better predict cardiovascular consequences of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) than the number of obstructive respiratory events measured with the apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI). Deeper hypoxaemia may potentially induce more severe pathophysiological consequences. However, the additional value of the percentage of total sleep time spent with saturation below 80% (TST80%) to TST90% is not fully explored. Methods: Comprehensive medical history was taken and fasting lipid and C-reactive protein levels were measured in 797 volunteers participating in two cohort studies in Hungary and Romania. Sleep parameters, including AHI, TST90% and TST80%, were recorded following a polysomnography (PSG, n = 598) or an inpatient cardiorespiratory polygraphy (n = 199). The performance of TST80% to predict cardiovascular risk was compared with TST90% using linear and logistic regression analyses as well receiver operating characteristics curves. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who had PSG, separately. Results: Both parameters are significantly related to cardiovascular risk factors; however, TST80% did not show better predictive value for cardiovascular risk than TST90%. On the other hand, patients with more severe hypoxaemia reported more excessive daytime sleepiness. Conclusions: TST80% has limited additional clinical value compared to TST90% when evaluating cardiovascular risk in patients with OSA.

Although most research has concentrated on the link between sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is also associated with ventricular arrhythmias. These cardiac arrhythmias can be triggered by repeated episodes of hypoxemia, hypercapnia, acidosis, intrathoracic pressure fluctuations, reoxygenation, and other mechanisms that occur during apnea and hypopnea. Studies show that OSA reduces the effectiveness of arrhythmia treatments, such as antiarrhythmic medications and radiofrequency current ablation. Several non-randomized studies indicate that treating sleep apnea syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may help maintain sinus rhythm following electrical cardioversion and increase the success rates of catheter ablation. This review aims to thoroughly examine the role of OSA in the development of cardiac arrhythmias. Screening for OSA and arrhythmias in patients with OSA provides vital information on the need for additional interventions, such as CPAP therapy, anticoagulation, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, catheter ablation for specific arrhythmias, or device therapy. New therapies for OSA treatment have the potential to significantly influence arrhythmia development in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. However, further research is required to validate these findings and formulate comprehensive treatment protocols.

The electrical ventricular storm (VES) is defined as multiple sustained ventricular arrhythmias arising in a short time, often refractory to standard antiarrhythmic treatment. The three pillars of the physiopathogenesis of the VES are autonomic dysfunction, triggers, and an altered ventricular substrate. Incessant or highly recurrent ventricular arrhythmia impacts the hemodynamic status by worsening heart failure and increasing mortality. A stepwise, team-based, and tailored therapeutic approach is required to stop ventricular arrhythmia and regain the hemodynamic and electric stability of the patient. The authors focused on describing all currently available therapeutic approaches for VES, intending to establish the best VES therapeutic approaches. This process involves considering the patient’s specific condition, responses to previous treatments, and the potential risks and benefits of each approach. The options range from adjusting antiarrhythmic therapy to reprogramming of the ICD, sedation, epidural anaesthesia, stellate ganglia anaesthetic block, and the use of ECMO or left ventricular assist devices and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Particular attention is paid to the detailed management of genetic primary arrhythmia syndromes like long-QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, Brugada syndrome and Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, early repolarisation syndrome, right ventricular arrhythmogenic dysplasia, and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. After overcoming the acute events of VES and obtaining hemodynamic stability, the treatment should shift toward an optimal balance of heart failure therapy, controlling the substrate by revascularisation procedures and resolving other pathology-generating ventricular arrhythmias. This article provides a comprehensive overview of ESV’s current management options using the most efficient strategies known to date.

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the risk is only weekly related to OSA severity traditionally determined by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. The Baveno classification was developed to improve patient selection who would benefit from OSA treatment in terms of symptoms improvement and CVD risk reduction. However, it is unclear how the classification relates to biomarkers of CVD risk. Composite lipid indices were evaluated in various populations and showed good predictive value for incident CVD. One thousand two hundred and forty-two patients with OSA were included in the study. Composite lipid indices, including the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were compared between different Baveno groups (A – minor symptoms, minor comorbidities, B – severe symptoms, minor comorbidities, C – minor symptoms, severe comorbidities, D – severe symptoms, severe comorbidities). All composite lipid indices were higher in group D versus groups A and C. Only LAP (86.93 /58.40–119.49/ vs. 75.73 /48.37–99.04/) and CMI (1.03 /0.69–1.42/ vs. 0.91 /0.63–1.12/) were significantly different between the minimally symptomatic groups (C vs. A), and solely LAP was significantly higher (110.69 /76.76–147.22/ vs. 82.32 /60.35–113.50/) when the highly symptomatic groups (D vs. B) were compared. The Baveno classification correlates with cardiovascular risk estimated with composite lipid indices. Composite lipid indices may help better stratifying cardiovascular risk in both minimally- and highly symptomatic patients.