Improving the quality of infrastructure is crucial for sustainable development. Providing infrastructure faces many challenges – both financially and in terms of how projects are delivered. This is particularly apparent for developing countries. This research aims to (a) determine the key factors influencing the successful delivery of infrastructure projects, (b) provide an example of these factors as manifested on an important Ecuadorian flood control and irrigation infrastructure project and (c) identify key learnings for future projects in similar contexts. Many of the key failure factors identified in the literature were evident on the example project, validating the literature findings and indicating that the learnings may be relevant to the context of developing countries more widely. These factors included insufficient planning, unrealistic estimates, poor stakeholder communication, bureaucracy, insufficient ground investigation and an inadequate project delivery system. Addressing these issues is an important step towards improving infrastructure delivery in developing countries.

This article aims to identify the main risk factors that are threats to meet the objectives of tunnel construction projects by using the Chilean construction industry as a case study and proposes a methodology to evaluate risk factors in this type of project. Surveys were used to generate probability and severity indexes to rank 36 risk factors. Data were collected from 14 companies that are members of the International Tunneling and Underground Space Association. The results indicate that the main risk factors that hinder achieving the tunneling construction project objectives are (1) inaccurate cost estimation or lack of detail in budget preparation, (2) unexpected geological conditions, (3) inaccurate deadline estimation or insufficient breakdown of the project schedule, (4) frequent malfunction of construction equipment, (5) excessive delays in approval processes by government entities, and (6) unexpected soil conditions and water table. Furthermore, a comprehensive literature review is provided to compare these results to international perspectives to confirm the existence of risks inherent to tunnel construction projects. This article concludes with revisiting the risk factors, which are common for the construction industry in general.

Global warming is the greatest environmental challenge that humanity is phasing. Water availability and biodiversity are also important issues of concern. Efforts towards achieving a sustainable path are required in all major sectors. The construction and infrastructure sector is an important contributor to global resource depletion and environmental impact. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a frequently used tool to assess the potential environmental impact of a product or service throughout its life cycle. The life cycle of a product involves the extraction of raw materials, processing, production, use, and end-of-life. The environmental performance is quantified according to several impact categories such as: global warming, abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidation, among others. LCA has been applied with success in the construction and infrastructure sector, in particular for buildings of all types. Literature in LCA of buildings use a variety of methodological approaches. The objective of this literature review is to identify and compare the different methodological approaches used in LCA of residential buildings, with a particular focus on functional unit, system boundaries, environmental impact categories, and data quality. The review indicates that there are different approaches used depending on the objective of each particular study.