Reuben Solomon

Dr. Reuben Solomon

Agronomy, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kano, Nigeria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKamaluddin Aliyu
Kamaluddin Aliyu
AKAlpha Kamara
Alpha Kamara
Jibrin JibrinJibrin Jibrin
Jibrin Jibrin
Elzo Jeroen HuisingElzo Jeroen Huising
Elzo Jeroen Huising
BSBello Muhammad Shehu
Bello Muhammad Shehu
SASamndi Musa Ayuba
Samndi Musa Ayuba
Site-specific nutrient management can reduce soil degradation and crop production risks related to undesirable timing, amount, and type of fertilizer application. This study was conducted to understand the spatial variability of soil properties and delineate spatially homogenous nutrient management zones (MZs) in the maize belt region of Nigeria. Soil samples (n = 3387) were collected across the area using multistage and random sampling techniques, and samples were analyzed for pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), macronutrients (N, P, K, S, Ca and Mg), micronutrients (S, B, Zn, Mn and Fe) content, and effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC). Spatial distribution and variability of these parameters were assessed using geostatistics and ordinary kriging, while principal component analysis (PCA) and multivariate K-means cluster analysis were used to delineate nutrient management zones. Results show that spatial variation of macronutrients (total N, available P, and K) was largely influenced by intrinsic factors, while that of S, Ca, ECEC, and most micronutrients was influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors with moderate to high spatial variability. Four distinct management zones, namely, MZ1, MZ2, MZ3, and MZ4, were identified and delineated in the area. MZ1 and MZ4 have the highest contents of most soil fertility indicators. MZ4 has a higher content of available P, Zn, and pH than MZ1. MZ2 and MZ3, which constitute the larger part of the area, have smaller contents of the soil fertility indicators. The delineated MZs offer a more feasible option for developing and implementing site-specific nutrient management in the maize belt region of Nigeria.

17 March 2020 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlpha Kamara
Alpha Kamara
AMAbebe Menkir
Abebe Menkir
DCDavid Chikoye
David Chikoye
RSReuben Solomon
Reuben Solomon
ATAbdullahi Ibrahim Tofa
Abdullahi Ibrahim Tofa
LOLucky Omoigui
Lucky Omoigui
Use of small doses of imazapyr and pyrithiobac for seed coatings of imazapyr-resistant maize hybrids (IR-Maize) offers an effective means to control Striga hermonthica. Field trials were conducted in Bauchi and Kano States of Nigeria in 2014 and 2015 under heavy Striga infestation to evaluate the potential effectiveness of herbicide coated hybrids maize on Striga control in farmers’ field. Results showed that herbicide coated seeds reduced number of emerged Striga per m2 and Striga damage symptoms in farmers’ fields in all the locations. In Kano the number of emerged Striga was 4.9 to 7.9 times less in herbicide treated hybrids in comparison with those of the same hybrids planted without herbicide treatment. The Striga-resistant open pollinated variety (OPV) (TZL COMP1 SYN) had 6.7 to 8.0 times more Striga than the treated hybrids. In Bauchi, the number of emerged Striga on the untreated IR-maize hybrids were over four-times higher on the treated IR-maize hybrids than on the untreated hybrids. The Striga-resistant OPV check had four-times more Striga than the treated IR-maize hybrids and twice more than the untreated IR-maize hybrids across the two years. However, the effects of herbicide seed coating on grain yields were not consistent because of strong seasonal effects. The result revealed that coating of imazapyr-resistant hybrid maize seeds with imazapyr was effective in reducing Striga infestation in farmers’ fields. Although herbicide seed coating did not give consistent yield advantages of the hybrids over the untreated checks, a combination of herbicide seed treatment and genetic resistance to Striga would serve as an effective integrated approach that could significantly reduce the parasite seed bank from the soil and prevent production of new seeds. The IR-hybrids and the OPV checks contained Striga resistance/tolerant genes that protected them against drastic yield loss in the Striga infested fields in both Bauchi and Kano.

25 September 2024 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OEOsagie Bright Eseigbe
Osagie Bright Eseigbe
AKAlpha Kamara
Alpha Kamara
SMSani Miko
Sani Miko
LOLucky Omoigui
Lucky Omoigui
RSReuben Solomon
Reuben Solomon
JBJenneh Bebeley
Jenneh Bebeley
Increasing delays in the onset of the rainy season and extended dry spells in the Nigerian savannas are complicating the determination of optimal planting dates for rain-fed crops, which increases risks for farmers. This study evaluated the impact of planting dates on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] performance to identify optimal planting dates for different soybean varieties in two agroecological zones (AEZs) of Nigeria. The study involved six planting dates (15 June, 22 June, 29 June, 6 July, 13 July, and 20 July) and three soybean varieties (TGX-1835-10E, TGX-1951-3F, TGX-1904-6F). Results showed significant differences in growth and yield parameters based on location, variety, and planting date. In the Sudan savanna (SS), AEZ at BUK-Kano, optimal yields (>1500 kg ha−1) were achieved when planting TGX-1835-10E and TGX-1951-3F from 15 to 29 June and TGX-1904-6F on 15 June. Planting beyond 29 June reduces yields by 12–55% for TGX-1835-10E and 27–63% for TGX-1951-3F. For TGX-1904-6F, planting after 15 June reduces yields by 27–90%. In the Northern Guinea savanna (NGS) AEZ at Zaria, optimal yields (>1500 kg ha−1) were obtained when planting TGX-1835-10E and TGX-1951-3F from 15 June to 6 July, and TGX-1904-6F between 15 to 29 June. Delaying planting beyond these dates significantly reduced yields by 18–31% for TGX-1835-10E and 12–20% for TGX-1951-3F and 10–41% for TGX-1904-6F.

24 May 2023 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LOLucky Omoigui
Lucky Omoigui
AKAlpha Kamara
Alpha Kamara
ASAbdulwahab Saliu Shaibu
Abdulwahab Saliu Shaibu
KAKamaluddin Aliyu
Kamaluddin Aliyu
ATAbdullahi Ibrahim Tofa
Abdullahi Ibrahim Tofa
OOOlalekan J. Olasan
Olalekan J. Olasan
Cowpea is a multifaceted crop; however, considerable challenges affect the production of this crop despite its comparatively better adaptation to harsh environments. Most smallholder farmers in West Africa cultivate this crop in intercropping systems where its low plant population does not allow the full expression of the cultivars’ yield potential. This is because most varieties currently grown in intercrop have been developed in and for monocropping, although some breeding programs recently have focused on intercrop systems. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the performance of some newly developed cowpea breeding lines for adaptation to intercropping systems. Firstly, an on-station field experiment was conducted in 2018. The selected promising lines and a standard check were evaluated in three locations in an intercropping system and on-farm trials. Significant differences were observed among the cowpea genotypes for all the traits measured. Two improved lines, UAM14-122-17-7 and UAM14-123-18-3, had superior grain and fodder yields under sole and intercropping systems and in different agroecological systems, revealing their adaptability. Based on our findings, UAM14-122-17-7 and UAM14-123-18-3 are recommended for a cereal-cowpea mixture because they are adapted to intercropping and produce high-grain yield under intercrop and sole-cropping systems.

1 November 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LOLucky Omoigui
Lucky Omoigui
AKAlpha Kamara
Alpha Kamara
ASAbdulwahab Saliu Shaibu
Abdulwahab Saliu Shaibu
TITeryima Iorlamen
Teryima Iorlamen
GEGodspower Ekeruo
Godspower Ekeruo
EIEsther Afor Ibrahim
Esther Afor Ibrahim
Cowpea production in Nigeria, the world’s largest producer, is insufficient to meet domestic demand due to significant yield gaps caused by various production constraints. Several high-yielding improved cowpea varieties have been developed and disseminated among smallholder farmers to improve productivity, but their adoption is low because breeding efforts have not adequately incorporated farmers’ and consumers’ preferred traits. To address this, a study was conducted to evaluate the performance of newly developed cowpea lines and identify those with traits preferred by farmers and consumers. Twenty-four cowpea lines were evaluated in multiple environments under sole and intercropped systems in Nigeria. The study revealed significant (p < 0.001) genotypic and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield, fodder yield, and other key agronomic traits. Three genotypes consistently outperformed the standard check, with UAM15-2157-4 exhibiting a 57.6% higher grain yield and superior seed quality. UAM15-2157-4 produced the highest grain yield (1289 kg ha−1) under the intercropping system. GGE biplot analysis identified UAM15-2157-4 as the most stable genotype across all tested environments. This genotype, along with other promising lines, possesses desirable traits such as Striga resistance, large seed size, and preferred seed coat color, making them suitable for release and adoption to improve cowpea productivity in the region.