Young-Du Kim

Young-Du Kim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2021 in Thoracic Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHyun Woo Jeon
Hyun Woo Jeon
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
SSSung Bo Sim
Sung Bo Sim
MMMi Hyoung Moon
Mi Hyoung Moon
Background: Patients with early lung cancer are the best candidates for surgical resection. However, those patients with high grade patterns (micropapillary or solid) do not have a good prognosis, even if they have been diagnosed with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. A new modified grading system has been introduced and this study aimed to identify the prognostic role of the new grading system in patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.Methods: Patients with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, according to the eighth TNM classification who underwent curative resection, were reviewed. The pathological data of stage IA adenocarcinoma was reviewed 1 (grade 1: lepidic predominant with no or less than 20% of high grade patterns, grade 2: acinar or papillary predominant with no or less than 20% of high grade patterns, grade 3: any tumor with 20% or more of high grade patterns). Prognostic factors were analyzed for disease‐free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional models.Results: The medical records of 429 patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma were reviewed. DFI (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients diagnosed with grade 3 compared with grade 1 and grade 2. Multivariate analysis showed that smoking (p = 0.013), value of SUVmax (p = 0.005), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.004) and grade 3 (p = 0.008) were significant prognostic factors for DFI.Conclusions: The proportion of high grade patterns showed a different prognosis, even if curative resection had been performed for stage IA adenocarcinoma. This new grading system is more simple and useful in the prediction of a prognosis in patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

16 July 2014 in World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHyun Woo Jeon
Hyun Woo Jeon
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
KKKyung Soo Kim
Kyung Soo Kim
SSSookwhan Sung
Sookwhan Sung
HPHyung Joo Park
Hyung Joo Park
JPJae Kil Park
Jae Kil Park
Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that sublobar resection is not inferior to lobectomy for peripheral early lung cancer with ground-glass opacification. However, the effect of sublobar resection on solid-type early lung cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone sublobar resection or lobectomy for solid-type, early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection between March 2000 and September 2010 for clinical stage IA NSCL. Patients with pure ground-glass opacities or death within 30 days after surgery were excluded. Disease-free interval, survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one patients and 133 patients underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy, respectively. There were significant differences in age (P <0.001), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.001), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P <0.001). The patients with lobectomy had a significantly longer disease-free interval (P <0.001) and survival (P = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, sublobar resection (P = 0.011), lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.006), and number of positive lymph nodes (P = 0.028) were predictors for survival. Sublobar resection (P <0.001), visceral pleural invasion (P = 0.002), and lymphatic vessel invasion (P <0.001) were predictors for disease-free interval. Conclusions: Lobectomy should remain the standard surgical procedure for solid-type, clinical stage IA, NSCLC.

5 August 2014 in World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHyun Woo Jeon
Hyun Woo Jeon
DCDeog Gon Cho
Deog Gon Cho
JPJae Kil Park
Jae Kil Park
KHKwanyoung Hyun
Kwanyoung Hyun
SCSi Young Choi
Si Young Choi
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
Although pericardial effusion (PE) is not uncommon in patients with cancer, it may lead to cardiac tamponade, a life-threatening condition. Prompt life-saving treatment is essential, and also allows the continuation of the cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic factors for survival in patients with cancer who were treated surgically for PE.

1 January 2016
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HJHyun Woo Jeon
Hyun Woo Jeon
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
YKYeo Kon Kye
Yeo Kon Kye
KKKyung Soo Kim
Kyung Soo Kim
Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a relatively common disorder in young patients. Although various surgical techniques have been introduced, recurrence after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains high. The aim of study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence after thoracoscopic bullectomy in the spontaneous pneumothorax. From January 2011 through March 2013, two hundreds and thirty two patients underwent surgery because of pneumothorax. Patients with a secondary pneumothorax, as well as cases of single port surgery, an open procedure, additional pleural procedure (pleurectomy, pleural abrasion) or lack of medical records were excluded. The records of 147 patients with PSP undergoing 3-port video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy with staple line coverage using an absorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 19 years (range, 11−34 years) with male predominance (87.8%). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1−10 days) without mortality. Complications were developed in five patients. A total of 24 patients showed postoperative recurrence (16.3%). Younger age less than 17 years old and immediate postoperative air leakage were risk factors for postoperative recurrence after thoracoscopic bullectomy by multivariate analysis. Immediate postoperative air leakage was the risk factor for postoperative recurrence. However, further study will be required for the correlation of air leakage with recurrence.

25 May 2021 in Thoracic Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHyun Woo Jeon
Hyun Woo Jeon
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
SSSung Bo Sim
Sung Bo Sim
MMMi Hyoung Moon
Mi Hyoung Moon
Background: Adenocarcinoma is the most common type of lung cancer and most adenocarcinomas have heterogeneous subtypes. Acinar‐predominant adenocarcinoma is the most common. This study aimed to identify the prognostic impact of other mixed histological subtypes in acinar‐predominant lung adenocarcinoma.Methods: The medical records of patients with pathological stage IA acinar‐predominant lung adenocarcinoma between January 2010 and April 2016 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the proportion of the lepidic subtype, with a cutoff value of 20%, and prognostic factors were analyzed.Results: A total of 215 patients with stage IA acinar‐predominant adenocarcinoma were reviewed. The 20% or more lepidic subtype group had a low value of SUVmax (p = 0.001), good differentiation (p < 0.001) and a low incidence of the solid histological subtype (p = 0.016). Recurrence was significantly lower in the 20% or more lepidic subtype group (p = 0.008). The disease‐free survival (p = 0.007) and overall survival (p = 0.046) were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006) and no or less than 20% lepidic subtype (p = 0.036) were significant prognostic factors for disease‐free survival.Conclusions: The lepidic proportion may be useful to predict recurrence in acinar‐predominant stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

1 May 2010 in Annals of Vascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJae Hyun Kim
Jae Hyun Kim
CNChan-Young Na
Chan-Young Na
SCSi Young Choi
Si Young Choi
HKHwan Wook Kim
Hwan Wook Kim
YKYoung-Du Kim
Young-Du Kim
CPChan Beom Park
Chan Beom Park