The optimal age for the repair of pectus excavatum using minimally invasive technique has yet to be determined. We hypothesized that the early repair of pectus excavatum may contribute in preserving chest wall integrity and also in enhancing patients' growth. The purpose of our present study was to verify a potential advantage of the early repair of pectus excavatum by using a minimally invasive technique. For our study on minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair, 1571 patients from the period 1999 to 2011 were enrolled. Our strategy was to carry out routine repairs in patients older than 3 years of age. To examine the age factor on the results of the repairs the patients were divided into different age groups: Group 1 (≤5 years, 618 (39.3%)), Group 2 (6–11 years, 322 (20.5%)), Group 3 (12–20 years, 401 (25.5%)) and Group 4 (>20 years, 230 (14.6%)). A comparative analysis was performed for factors such as complication rates; growth-percentile scores of height, weight and body mass index (BMI); incidence of asymmetry and costal flare score to determine the potential to resume the normal chest wall conformation by earlier repair. The mean age of the patients was 10.2 years (16 months to 51 years). The incidence of asymmetry was found to be lowest in Group 1 (24.3, 45.5, 58.7, 48.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). The complication rate after repair was also lowest in Group 1 (7.6, 11.5, 16.3, 19.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). The growth of body weight was significant in Groups 1 and 2 (0.53 ± 1.02, P < 0.001). The costal flare score was found to have decreased in Groups 1 and 2 (Group 1: from 1.6 to 0.12, P < 0.001; Group 2: from 1.44 to 0.14, P < 0.001). In Groups 3 and 4, there was no improvement in costal flare after repair. Our results suggest that routine early repair of pectus excavatum in patients older than 3 years of age is safe and effective. We would recommend early repair to avoid asymmetry transformation of the deformity and to enhance the patients’ growth potential.

Background: Simple external compression of pectus carinatum seems to have its limitations, particularly the repair of asymmetric pectus carinatum or excavatum/carinatum complex. We devised the sandwich technique (press-molding) to remodel the entire chest wall. The purpose of this study is to introduce the sandwich technique and appraise the early results. Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2016, 523 consecutive patients with pectus carinatum and its variants were analyzed retrospectively. No patients were excluded during the study period. The sandwich 1 and 2 techniques using the internal and external pectus bars were for pectus carinatum repair. Modified techniques using the external string and the internal bar were to treat the lower costal flare (the flare-buster) and focal protuberances (the magic string) in pectus excavatum repair. Statistical analyses were carried out using paired and unpaired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: The sandwich repair with the external and internal bars was applied to 58 pectus carinatum patients: seven symmetric (12.1%), 14 asymmetric (24.1%), and 37 carinatum-excavatum complex (63.8%). After pectus excavatum repair, 426 patients had the flare-buster and 39 patients received the magic string. The sandwich 1 technique achieved near-complete resolution of carinatum in 52 patients (86.2%). The sandwich 2 technique accomplished almost symmetric configuration with no residual carinatum in all six cases. Conclusions: The sandwich technique using the external and internal bars seems to be effective in treating asymmetric pectus carinatum and complex excavatum/carinatum deformities. The flare-buster and the magic string effectively relieve the costal flare and focal protuberances in pectus excavatum repair.

A technique for complex pectus excavatum repair: the cross-bar technique for grand canyon type deformity (Park classification)

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that sublobar resection is not inferior to lobectomy for peripheral early lung cancer with ground-glass opacification. However, the effect of sublobar resection on solid-type early lung cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone sublobar resection or lobectomy for solid-type, early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection between March 2000 and September 2010 for clinical stage IA NSCL. Patients with pure ground-glass opacities or death within 30 days after surgery were excluded. Disease-free interval, survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one patients and 133 patients underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy, respectively. There were significant differences in age (P <0.001), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.001), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P <0.001). The patients with lobectomy had a significantly longer disease-free interval (P <0.001) and survival (P = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, sublobar resection (P = 0.011), lymphatic vessel invasion (P = 0.006), and number of positive lymph nodes (P = 0.028) were predictors for survival. Sublobar resection (P <0.001), visceral pleural invasion (P = 0.002), and lymphatic vessel invasion (P <0.001) were predictors for disease-free interval. Conclusions: Lobectomy should remain the standard surgical procedure for solid-type, clinical stage IA, NSCLC.