Luis Sandoval

Mr. Luis Sandoval

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2010 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBEstaban Biamonte
Estaban Biamonte
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval
ECEduardo Chacón-Madrigal
Eduardo Chacón-Madrigal
GBGilbert Barrantes
Gilbert Barrantes

6 June 2015 in Journal of Ornithology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval
CMCarolina Méndez
Carolina Méndez
DMDaniel J. Mennill
Daniel J. Mennill

11 August 2021 in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OEOscar Espinoza
Oscar Espinoza
LGLuis Eduardo González
Luis Eduardo González
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval
NMNoel McGinn
Noel McGinn
BCBruno Corradi
Bruno Corradi

1 October 2012 in Current Zoology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval
DWDavid R. Wilson
David R. Wilson
Many birds join cooperative mobbing aggregations and collectively harass predators. Individuals participating in these ephemeral associations benefit by deterring the predator, but also incur energetic costs and increased risk of predation. Explaining the evolution of mobbing is challenging because individuals could prevail by selfishly seeking safety while allowing others to mob. An important step in understanding the evolution of mobbing is to identify factors affecting its expression. The ecological constraints model suggests that animals are more likely to cooperate under adverse environmental conditions, such as when local predation pressure is high. We tested this prediction by comparing the mobbing responses of several species of birds to the local abundance of their primary predator, the ferruginous pygmy-owl Glaucidium brasilianum. We used acoustic playback to elicit mobbing responses in environments where owls were common, uncommon, or rare. Stimuli were either the song of a ferruginous pygmy-owl or the mobbing calls of three of the owl’s common prey species. During each playback, we characterized mobbing responses by noting the number of species and individuals that approached the loudspeaker, as well as the closest approach by any bird. Mobbing responses to both stimuli were strong in locations where Ferruginous Pygmy-owls were common, intermediate where owls were uncommon, and weak where they were rare. This pattern persisted even after controlling for differences in species richness and composition among the three environments. Results support the ecological constraints model and provide strong evidence that intense predation pressure increases the expression of cooperative mobbing in tropical birds.

25 May 2013 in Ibis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PRPriscilla Redondo
Priscilla Redondo
GBGilbert Barrantes
Gilbert Barrantes
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval

5 December 2017 in Studies in Higher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OEOscar Espinoza
Oscar Espinoza
LGLuis Eduardo González
Luis Eduardo González
NMNoel McGinn
Noel McGinn
Dante CastilloDante Castillo
Dante Castillo
LSLuis Sandoval
Luis Sandoval
Universities’ reputations are built in part on graduates’ assessments of the quality of education they received. What do these assessments tell us? Are graduates’ judgments of quality based on their experiences as students or on their later job satisfaction, that is, on process or on outcomes? The objective of this study was to assess the extent to which Chilean university graduates’ satisfaction with their professional training is associated with experiences during the degree program they pursued, employment experiences including salary level, or the prestige level or image of the university they attended. Survey questionnaires were used to collect data from recent graduates of professional programs in Primary-Secondary Teaching and Psychology in three universities that differ in prestige. A linear regression model shows that graduates’ satisfaction with their degree program is a joint function of family background, program quality and university image, but not salary once graduated.