Marta Belmonte

Dr. Marta Belmonte

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2023 in Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pasquale PaolissoPasquale Paolisso
Pasquale Paolisso
Luca BergamaschiLuca Bergamaschi
Luca Bergamaschi
ACArturo Cesaro
Arturo Cesaro
EGEmanuele Gallinoro
Emanuele Gallinoro
Felice GragnanoFelice Gragnano
Felice Gragnano
CPCarmine Pizzi
Carmine Pizzi

18 March 2025 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Matteo ArmillottaMatteo Armillotta
Matteo Armillotta
Luca BergamaschiLuca Bergamaschi
Luca Bergamaschi
Pasquale PaolissoPasquale Paolisso
Pasquale Paolisso
MBMarta Belmonte
Marta Belmonte
FAFrancesco Angeli
Francesco Angeli
CPCarmine Pizzi
Carmine Pizzi
BACKGROUND: Periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) with or without type 4a myocardial infarction (MI) might occur in patients with non–ST-segment–elevation MI (NSTEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigated the incidence and prognostic relevance of these events, according to current definitions, in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI. The best cardiac troponin I (cTnI) threshold of PMI for prognostic stratification is also suggested. METHODS: Consecutive patients with NSTEMI from January 2017 to April 2022 undergoing PCI with stable or falling pre-PCI cTnI levels were enrolled. According to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, the study population was stratified into those experiencing (1) PMI with type 4a MI, (2) PMI without type 4a MI, or (3) no PMI. Post-PCI cTnI increase >20% with an absolute postprocedural value of ≥5 times the 99th percentile upper reference limit within 48 hours after PCI was used to define PMI. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary end point consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year, including all-cause mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, urgent revascularization, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure. Internal validation was performed in patients enrolled between May 2022 and April 2023. RESULTS: Among 1412 patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI with stable or falling cTnI levels at baseline, 240 (17%) experienced PMI with type 4a MI, 288 (20.4%) experienced PMI without type 4a MI, and 884 (62.6%) experienced no PMI. PMI was associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, with patients with type 4a MI demonstrating the highest rates of 1-year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. A post-PCI ΔcTnI >20% but ≤40% showed similar outcomes to patients without PMI, whereas >40% was identified as the optimal threshold for prognostically relevant PMI, confirmed in an internal validation cohort of 305 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural ischemic events were frequent in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI with prognostic implications. A post-PCI ΔcTnI >40%, combined with an absolute postprocedural value of ≥5 times the 99th percentile upper reference limit, was identified as the optimal threshold for diagnosing prognostically relevant PMI. Recognizing these events may improve risk stratification and management of patients with NSTEMI.

1 January 2024 in Circulation: Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pasquale PaolissoPasquale Paolisso
Pasquale Paolisso
EGEmanuele Gallinoro
Emanuele Gallinoro
MBMarta Belmonte
Marta Belmonte
DBDARIO TINO BERTOLONE
DARIO TINO BERTOLONE
KBKonstantinos Bermpeis
Konstantinos Bermpeis
MVMarc Vanderheyden
Marc Vanderheyden
BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is involved in heart failure (HF) onset and progression, independently of HF phenotype and obstructive coronary artery disease. Invasive assessment of CMD might provide insights into phenotyping and prognosis of patients with HF. We aimed to assess absolute coronary flow, absolute microvascular resistance, myocardial perfusion, coronary flow reserve, and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: Single-center, prospective study of 56 consecutive patients with de novo HF with nonobstructive coronary artery disease divided into HF with preserved ejection fraction (n=21) and HFrEF (n=35). CMD was invasively assessed by continuous intracoronary thermodilution and defined as coronary flow reserve <2.5. Left ventricular and left anterior descending artery–related myocardial mass was quantified by echocardiography and coronary computed tomography angiography. Myocardial perfusion (mL/min per g) was calculated as the ratio between absolute coronary flow and left anterior descending artery–related mass. RESULTS: Patients with HFrEF showed a higher left ventricular and left anterior descending artery–related myocardial mass compared with HF with preserved ejection fraction ( P <0.010). Overall, 52% of the study population had CMD, with a similar prevalence between the 2 groups. In HFrEF, CMD was characterized by lower absolute microvascular resistance and higher absolute coronary flow at rest (functional CMD; P =0.002). CMD was an independent predictor of a lower rate of left ventricular reverse remodeling at follow-up. In patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, CMD was mainly due to higher absolute microvascular resistance and lower absolute coronary flow during hyperemia (structural CMD; P ≤0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intracoronary thermodilution allows the definition and characterization of patterns with distinct CMD in patients with HF and could identify patients with HFrEF with a higher rate of left ventricular reverse remodeling at follow-up.

1 March 2024 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Pasquale PaolissoPasquale Paolisso
Pasquale Paolisso
Luca BergamaschiLuca Bergamaschi
Luca Bergamaschi
FAFrancesco Angeli
Francesco Angeli
MBMarta Belmonte
Marta Belmonte
AFAlberto Foà
Alberto Foà
CPCarmine Pizzi
Carmine Pizzi
BACKGROUND: Multimodality imaging is currently suggested for the noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac masses. The identification of cardiac masses’ malignant nature is essential to guide proper treatment. We aimed to develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived model including mass localization, morphology, and tissue characterization to predict malignancy (with histology as gold standard), to compare its accuracy versus the diagnostic echocardiographic mass score, and to evaluate its prognostic ability. METHODS: Observational cohort study of 167 consecutive patients undergoing comprehensive echocardiogram and CMR within 1-month time interval for suspected cardiac mass. A definitive diagnosis was achieved by histological examination or, in the case of cardiac thrombi, by histology or radiological resolution after adequate anticoagulation treatment. Logistic regression was performed to assess CMR-derived independent predictors of malignancy, which were included in a predictive model to derive the CMR mass score. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to investigate the prognostic ability of predictors. RESULTS: In CMR, mass morphological features (non-left localization, sessile, polylobate, inhomogeneity, infiltration, and pericardial effusion) and mass tissue characterization features (first-pass perfusion and heterogeneity enhancement) were independent predictors of malignancy. The CMR mass score (range, 0–8 and cutoff, ≥5), including sessile appearance, polylobate shape, infiltration, pericardial effusion, first-pass contrast perfusion, and heterogeneity enhancement, showed excellent accuracy in predicting malignancy (areas under the curve, 0.976 [95% CI, 0.96–0.99]), significantly higher than diagnostic echocardiographic mass score (areas under the curve, 0.932; P =0.040). The agreement between the diagnostic echocardiographic mass and CMR mass scores was good (κ=0.66). A CMR mass score of ≥5 predicted a higher risk of all-cause death ( P <0.001; hazard ratio, 5.70) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A CMR-derived model, including mass morphology and tissue characterization, showed excellent accuracy, superior to echocardiography, in predicting cardiac masses malignancy, with prognostic implications.

16 June 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luca BergamaschiLuca Bergamaschi
Luca Bergamaschi
APAnna Giulia Pavon
Anna Giulia Pavon
FAFrancesco Angeli
Francesco Angeli
DTDomenico Tuttolomondo
Domenico Tuttolomondo
MBMarta Belmonte
Marta Belmonte
Marco GuglielmoMarco Guglielmo
Marco Guglielmo
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with a high socioeconomic impact. Currently, various guidelines and recommendations have been published about chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). According to the recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on chronic coronary syndrome, a multimodal imaging approach is strongly recommended in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD. Today, in the current practice, non-invasive imaging methods can assess coronary anatomy through coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and/or inducible myocardial ischemia through functional stress testing (stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, single photon emission computed tomography—SPECT, or positron emission tomography—PET). However, recent trials (ISCHEMIA and REVIVED) have cast doubt on the previous conception of the management of patients with CCS, and nowadays it is essential to understand the limitations and strengths of each imaging method and, specifically, when to choose a functional approach focused on the ischemia versus a coronary anatomy-based one. Finally, the concept of a pathophysiology-driven treatment of these patients emerged as an important goal of multimodal imaging, integrating ‘anatomical’ and ‘functional’ information. The present review aims to provide an overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for the comprehensive management of CCS patients.

5 October 2023 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADaniele Andreini
Daniele Andreini
MBMarta Belmonte
Marta Belmonte
MPMartin Penicka
Martin Penicka
LHLieven Van Hoe
Lieven Van Hoe
NMNiya Mileva
Niya Mileva
CCCarlos Collet
Carlos Collet