Purpose: To investigate the morphological or functional differences of retina in amblyopia. Materials and methods: Forty-one patients with unilateral strabismic, anisometropic or combined amblyopia were included in the study. A control group was composed of 16 normal children. All participants were tested with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and pattern electroretinography (PERG). The findings from amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes were compared among the amblyopic groups. Also, amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes were compared with the healthy control eyes. Results: No significant difference was found in OCT parameters for amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes among the amblyopic groups (p > 0.05). In the combined and anisometropic groups, ganglion cell complex (GCC) was found to be significantly increased in both amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In strabismic amblyopia, significant reduction in GCC thickness and increase in foveal thickness were found, compared to nonamblyopic eyes (p = 0.019, p = 0.08). There were no significant differences in PERG amplitude and latency between the amblyopic and the nonamblyopic eyes in amblyopic groups (p > 0.05). PERG amplitude in amblyopic eyes was found to be significantly decreased compared with that in normal eyes (p < 0.05). When the nonamblyopic eyes were compared with the control group, only the anisometropic amblyopia group demonstrated significant reduction in amplitude and prolongation in latency (p = 0.002, p = 0.026). Conclusion: We found no significant differences in morphological and functional measures among amblyopic groups. However, we detected significant differences in the retinal function and morphology of both amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes compared with healthy control eyes.

Aim. Rasmussen encephalitis is associated with severe seizures that are unresponsive to antiepileptic drugs, as well as immunosuppressants. Transcranial direct current stimulation (t‐DCS) is a non‐invasive and safe method tried mostly for focal epilepsies with different aetiologies. To date, there is only one published study with two case reports describing the effect of t‐DCS in Rasmussen encephalitis. Our aim was to investigate the effect of t‐DCS on seizures in Rasmussen encephalitis and to clarify its safety.Methods. Five patients (mean age: 19; three females), diagnosed with Rasmussen encephalitis were included in this study. Patients received first cathodal, then anodal (2 mA for 30 minutes on three consecutive days for non‐sham stimulations), and finally sham stimulation with two‐month intervals, respectively. Three patients received classic (DC) cathodal t‐DCS whereas two patients received cathodal stimulation with amplitude modulation at 12 Hz. Afterwards, all patients received anodal stimulation with amplitude modulation at 12 Hz. In the last part of the trial, sham stimulation (a 60‐second stimulation with gradually decreasing amplitude to zero in the last 15 seconds) was applied to three patients. Maximum current density was 571 mA/m2 using 70 mm × 50 mm wet sponge electrodes with 2‐mA maximum, current controlled stimulator, and maximum charge density was 1028 C/m2 for a 30‐minute stimulation period.Results. After cathodal stimulation, all but one patient had a greater than 50% decrease in seizure frequency. Two patients who received modulated cathodal t‐DCS had better results. The longest positive effect lasted for one month. A second trial with modulated anodal stimulation and a third with sham stimulation were not effective. No adverse effect was reported with all types of stimulations.Conclusion. Both classic and modulated cathodal t‐DCS may be suitable alternative methods for improving seizure outcome in Rasmussen encephalitis patients.

To investigate the correlation of visual field (VF), pattern electroretinography (PERG) and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) results in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and early primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The study included 72 eyes of 37 patients with early POAG, 76 eyes of 38 patients with OHT, and 60 eyes of 30 controls. All subjects underwent full ophthalmologic examination, VF assessment with 24-2 Humphrey standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA)-Standard), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness measurement with FD-OCT, and PERG P50 and N95 wave latency and amplitude measurements with electroretinography (Nihon Kohden). With the exception of the nasal quadrant, all GCC parameters and RNFL results were significantly lower in the POAG group compared to the OHT and control groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the OHT and control group. PERG amplitudes were lower in the POAG and OHT groups than in the control group. Reduction in N95 amplitude was greater than that of P50 amplitude. No difference was detected in PERG latencies among groups. GCC was significantly correlated with VF and RNFL in the POAG group. Significant thinning of the GCC and RNFL occurs in addition to VF pathologies in patients with early POAG, and these examinations should be concomitantly evaluated. During diagnostic assessment of patients with early POAG, GCC and RNFL analysis by FD-OCT are highly effective. GCC is as reliable as RNLF in the early diagnosis of glaucoma and there is a highly significant correlation between them. Dysfunction of ganglion cells in patients with OHT may be detected earlier using PERG amplitude analysis.

Several studies have shown the positive effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on balance in patients and older adults. However, in healthy volunteers, the results are conflicting. We aimed to investigate the immediate effect of anodal ctDCS on the dynamic–static balance in healthy, non-athletic young adults due to the possible benefits for sports performance. Twenty-one healthy volunteers participated in two consecutive 20 min sessions of ctDCS (2 mA current intensity), with 1-week intervals (anodal ctDCS–sham ctDCS). Flamingo and Y-Balance tests were used to evaluate the static and dynamic balances before and after the ctDCS. A Continuous Performance Test (CPT) was used to evaluate the changes in sustained attention, impulsivity, and vigilance. A repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the changes in balance scores, reaction time, omission, and commission numbers. There were no statistically significant differences in dynamic and static balance scores and in CPT parameters between conditions. In conclusion, there was no immediate neuromodulation effect of anodal ctDCS to improve balance performance in healthy, young individuals. Furthermore, no evidence was found to support the use of cerebellar tDCS to improve sports performance.