Posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws (PS) is the most used procedure to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Computed navigation, robotic navigation, and patient-specific drill templates are available, besides the first described free-hand technique. None of these techniques are recognized as the gold standard. This review compares the PS placement accuracy and misplacement-related complication rates achieved with the techniques mentioned above. It further reports PS accuracy classifications and anatomic PS misplacement risk factors. The literature suggests a higher PS placement accuracy for robotic relative to computed navigation and for the latter relative to the free-hand technique (misplacement rates: 0.4–7.2% versus 1.9–11% versus 1.5–50.7%) using variable accuracy classifications. The reported PS-misplacement-related complication rates are, however, uniformly low (0–1.4%) for every technique, while robotic and computed navigation induce a roughly fourfold increase in the patient’s intraoperative radiation exposure relative to the free-hand technique with fluoroscopic implant positioning control. The authors, therefore, recommend dedicating robotic and computed navigation for complex deformities or revisions with altered landmarks, underline the need for a generally accepted PS accuracy classification, and advise against PS placement in grade 4 pedicles yielding higher misplacement rates (22.2–31.5%).

High-energy pelvic ring injuries (PRI) represent a heavy burden for institutions treating severely injured patients. Epidemiological data knowledge may help to provide them appropriate management. Only two epidemiologic studies about high-energy PRI were published during last decade. This study aimed to determine the gender-specific and global incidences of high-energy blunt AO/OTA type B or C PRI and their frequency among high-energy blunt trauma. It further reports the spectrum of these injuries and compares their characteristics and outcomes to high-energy blunt trauma without type B or C PRI. Type B or C PRI incidence isn't gender specific and approximates 5/100,000/year. A prospective database of a level-I trauma center serving approximately 500,000 inhabitants was retrospectively queried for all high-energy trauma patients injured between 01.01.2014 and 12.31.2016. Inclusion criteria were: alive emergency department delivery; entire acute treatment at the authors' institution; age >16. Exclusion criteria were: penetrating, blast, burn and electrical injuries; drownings; low-energy trauma; patients living outside the institution's catchment area. Three authors performed PRI classifications. Clinical data were extracted from the database. We analyzed 434 patients. High-energy blunt type B or C PRI incidence was 3.8/100,000/year without gender disparity (p=0.6697). High-energy blunt trauma incidence was lower in women than in men (20.5 vs. 51.6/100,000/year, p<0.001). Type B or C PRI frequency during high-energy blunt trauma was higher in women than in men (17.6% vs. 7.9%, p=0.003). Type B or C PRI patients were more severely injured and needed more treatment resources than other high-energy blunt trauma patients but didn't present higher complication or death rates. The incidence of high-energy blunt type B or C PRI was comparable to previously published data. Women were less likely to sustain a high-energy blunt trauma, but when they sustained one, they were more likely to have a type B or C PRI. Despite higher injury severity score and resource requirements, complication and death rates weren't different between type B or C PRI patients and other high-energy blunt trauma patients. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

This study evaluates potential associations between the perioperative urinary catheter (UC) carriage and (Gram-negative) surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery. It is a retrospective, single-center, case-control study stratifying group comparisons, case-mix adjustments using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Around half of the patients (2734/5485 surgeries) carried a UC for 1 day (median duration) (interquartile range, 1–1 days). Patients with perioperative UC carriage were compared to those without regarding SSI, in general, and Gram-negative, exclusively. The SSI rate was 1.2% (67/5485), yielding 67 revision surgeries. Gram-negative pathogens caused 16 SSIs. Seven Gram-negative episodes revealed the same pathogen concomitantly in the urine and the spine. In the multivariate analysis, the UC carriage duration was associated with SSI (OR 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.1), albeit less than classical risk factors like diabetes (OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.1–4.2), smoking (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.4–4.3), or higher ASA-Scores (OR 2.3, 95%CI 1.4–3.6). In the second multivariate analysis targeting Gram-negative SSIs, the female sex (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.4–10.6) and a UC carriage > 1 day (OR 5.5, 95%CI 1.5–20.3) were associated with Gram-negative SSIs. Gram-negative SSIs after spine surgery seem associated with perioperative UC carriage, especially in women. Other SSI risk factors are diabetes, smoking, and higher ASA scores.

The posterior minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) approach—or the paraspinal muscle approach—for posterior spinal fusion and segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was first reported in 2011. It is less invasive than the traditionally used open posterior midline approach, which is associated with significant morbidity, including denervation of the paraspinal muscles, significant blood loss, and a large midline skin incision. The literature suggests that the MISS approach, though technically challenging and with a longer operative time, provides similar levels of deformity correction, lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, better pain outcomes, and a faster return to sports than the open posterior midline approach. Correction maintenance and fusion rates also seem to be equivalent for both approaches. This narrative review presents the results of relevant publications reporting on spinal segmental instrumentation using pedicle screws and posterior spinal fusion as part of an MISS approach. It then compares them with the results of the traditional open posterior midline approach for treating AIS. It specifically examines perioperative morbidity and radiological and clinical outcomes with a minimal follow-up length of 2 years (range 2–9 years).

Application of a pelvic binder in the pre-hospital settings is a crucial step of high-energy blunt pelvic ring injury (PRI) management protocols. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the percentage of pre-hospital pelvic binder's applications in high-energy blunt type B or C PRI patients managed at a single level I trauma center, and to assess its impact on the medical resource requirements and patients' outcomes. The institutional Severely Injured Patients' Registry was screened for patients meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) high-energy blunt PRI; (2) admission between 2014.01.01 and 2022.12.31; (3) age ≥16 years; and (4) available computed tomography of the pelvis. Exclusion criteria were: (1) death before admission; (2) low-energy injury; (3) penetrating, blast and electrical injuries; and (4) secondary transfers. Study variables, including pre-hospital application of a pelvic binder and demographic, clinical, management and outcome data were extracted from the registry. Additionally, AO/OTA classifications were determined. A consecutive series of 262 patients was included into the final analysis. Of these, 58.8 % received a pre-hospital pelvic binder (PPB), increasing from type A (45.1 %) to type B (57.8 %) and type C (73.7 %). Pre-hospital hemodynamic instability was a major factor triggering the use of PPB in high-energy blunt type B PRI patients with PPB in 76.9 % of the cases with hemodynamic instability vs. 51.3 % of the cases without hemodynamic instability (p = 0.009). This difference was not statistically significant for high-energy blunt type C PRI patients (82.8 % vs. 64.3 %, p = 0.200). The presence of a physician on the trauma site contributed to the increased percentage of PRI managed with PPB from 43.5 % to 67.3 % in type B PRI (p = 0.011), and from 50 % to 77.1 % in type C PRI (p = 0.257). This study showed an increased need for packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusions in subgroups treated with PPB and no statistically significant differences in term of intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital length of stay and complications between high-energy blunt type B or C PRI patients with or without PPB. Comparison of mortality rates in patients with and without PPB showed a trend towards lower mortality rates with PPB in patients with AIS extremity participating in at least 50 % of the total ISS. In the ideal pre-hospital scenario, every high-energy blunt type B or C PRI patient should be managed with a PPB. Continuous pre-hospital team training and information is crucial to achieve this goal. The preparation of Emergency Department and ICU who admit a patient with PPB should include a sufficient number of PRBC ready for transfusion. Mortality rates did not seem to be affected by PPB, except for a trend towards lower mortality rates in patients in whom their PRI was the major component of the global severity of their injury. This might point out the critical and positive effect of PPB in high-energy blunt PRI patients.

High-energy pelvic ring injuries (PRI) are severe, life-threatening trauma conditions which might require complex surgical management. One of the major complications associated with these injuries is the development of surgical site infections (SSI) which significantly impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of SSI in patients undergoing surgical fixation of high-energy blunt PRI and identify the key predisposing factors. A retrospective review of patients treated for high-energy blunt PRI was conducted using the prospectively filled institutional Severely Injured Patients' Registry, focusing on the rate of SSI following surgical fixation. The multifactorial nature of infection risk was analyzed, with particular attention to the type of injury, surgical technique, external fixation devices' usage and the germs encountered. A SSI rate of 10,5 % (12 out of 114 patients) was encountered among the study population. The primary SSI risk factor was PRI complexity; 83.3 % of patients with SSI had an AO/OTA type C fracture and 16.7 % a type B fracture, while 43.1 % of patients without SSI had a type C fracture and 56.9 % a type B fracture (p = 0.008). Additionally, SSI patients had a trend to have higher extremities/pelvis AIS and higher ISS, and to have been more often treated with a transient pelvic fixation device including supra-acetabular external fixator. These findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive infection prevention strategy in high-energy PRI patients, especially in complex cases. A multidisciplinary approach is of outmost importance and should include surgical techniques with meticulous soft tissue handling, proper implant selection and aggressive post-operative wound care. Despite external fixation devices being related to certain cases of SSI, their life-saving potential during the initial management phase should be carefully weighed against this risk.