Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, involving mainly the lungs and central nervous system; however, the skin, eyes and genitourinary tract could also be involved as secondary sites of infection. Primary cutaneous cryptococcosis (PCC) is a distinct clinical entity that can occur in both immunocompetent and -compromised patients, usually trough skin injury. In immunocompetent patients, it is a very rare infection, presenting with non-specific clinical pictures and being challenging to diagnose. Herein, we present the case of an immunocompetent man with PCC due to Cryptococcus neoformans on his right forearm. PCC was diagnosed by a histological and cultural examination. Causes of concomitant immunosuppression were ruled out. A secondary cutaneous cryptococcosis was excluded with careful investigations. Therapy with oral fluconazole for three months was successfully performed, without evidence of recurrence in the following six months. Complete clinical recovery was achieved after three months of oral antifungal therapy, suggesting that longer courses of treatment could be avoided when faced with PCC in immunocompetent patients.

Background: Since limited data are available, we aimed to compare the efficacy and durability of dolutegravir and darunavir in advanced naïve patients. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study including AIDS- or late-presenting (def. CD4 ≤ 200/µL) HIV-infected patients starting dolutegravir or ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted darunavir+2NRTIs. Patients were followed from the date of first-line therapy initiation (baseline, BL) to the discontinuation of darunavir or dolutegravir, or for a maximum of 36 months of follow-up. Results: Overall 308 patients (79.2% males, median age 43 years, 40.3% AIDS-presenters, median CD4 66 cells/µL) were enrolled; 181 (58.8%) and 127 (41.2%) were treated with dolutegravir and darunavir, respectively. Incidence of treatment discontinuation (TD), virological failure (VF, defined as a single HIV-RNA > 1000 cp/mL or two consecutive HIV-RNA > 50 cp/mL after 6 months of therapy or after virological suppression had been achieved), treatment failure (the first of TD or VF), and optimal immunological recovery (defined as CD4 ≥ 500/µL + CD4 ≥ 30% + CD4/CD8 ≥ 1) were 21.9, 5.2, 25.6 and 1.4 per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively, without significant differences between dolutegravir and darunavir (p > 0.05 for all outcomes). However, a higher estimated probability of TD for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (at 36 months: 11.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) was observed for dolutegravir, whereas darunavir showed a higher probability of TD for simplification (at 36 months: 21.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.046). Conclusions: Dolutegravir and darunavir showed similar efficacy in AIDS- and late-presenting patients. A higher risk of TD due to CNS toxicity was observed with dolutegravir, and a higher probability of treatment simplification with darunavir.

Recurrence of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 viral load relapse have been reported in people treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/r). However, little is understood about the etiology of this phenomenon. Our aim was to investigate the relation between the host’s immune response and viral rebound. We described three cases of COVID-19 rebound that occurred after treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (group A). In addition, we compared spike-specific antibody response and plasma cytokine/chemokine patterns of the rebound cases with those of (i) control patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir who did not show rebound (group B), and (ii) subjects not treated with any anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug (group C). The anti-spike antibodies and plasma cytokines/chemokines were similar in groups A and B. However, we observed a higher anti-BA.2 spike IgG response in patients without antiviral treatment (group C) [geometric mean titer 210,807, 5.1- and 8.2-fold higher compared to group A (p = 0.039) and group B (p = 0.032)]. Moreover, the patients receiving antiviral treatment (groups A-B) showed higher circulating levels of platelet-derived growth factor subunit B (PDGF-BB) and vascular endothelial growth Factors (VEGF) and lower levels of interleukin-9 (IL-9), interleukine-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 RA), and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted chemokine (RANTES) when compared to group C. In conclusion, we observed lower anti-spike IgG levels and different cytokine patterns in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated patients compared to those not treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs. This suggests that early antiviral treatment, by reducing viral load and antigen presentation, could mitigate the immune response against SARS-CoV-2. The clinical relevance of such observation should be further investigated in larger populations.

The unceasing interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and the human immune system has led to a continuous maturation of the virus and B cell response providing an opportunity to track their evolution in real time. We longitudinally analyzed the functional activity of almost 1,000 neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies (nAbs) isolated from vaccinated people, and from individuals with hybrid and super hybrid immunity (SH), developed after three mRNA vaccine doses and two breakthrough infections. The most potent neutralization and Fc functions against highly mutated variants, including BA.2.86, were found in the SH cohort. Despite different priming, epitope mapping revealed a convergent maturation of the functional antibody response. Neutralization was mainly driven by Class 1/2 nAbs while Fc functions were induced by Class 3/4 antibodies. Remarkably, broad neutralization was mediated by restored IGHV3-53/3-66 B cell germlines which, after heterogenous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 S proteins, increased their level of somatic hypermutations. Our study shows the resilience of the human immune system which restored previously expanded germlines and activated naïve B cells to broaden the antibody repertoire of antibodies to control future SARS-CoV-2 variants.