Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for early malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Its clinical results have been reported to be as good as surgery. The outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD have been reported to be as good as first-line surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in the upper GI tract and the outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD performed in Linz, Austria, between 2009 and January 2023. A total of 193 ESDs were included and divided into 104 esophageal ESD and 89 gastric ESD procedures. The criteria for curative ESD were in line with established guidelines’ recommendations. For esophageal lesions, the mean lesion size was 40.3 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 56.7%. In the non-curative ESD, the rate of technical failure as the reason for non-curative ESD was 13.3% and the oncological failure rate was 86.7%. Only 48.7% of indicated rescue surgeries were performed. The main reason for not performing surgery was interdisciplinary consensus due to comorbidity. Perioperative complications Dindo–Clavien ≥ 3 occurred in 22.2% of cases with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0. In gastric lesions, the mean size was 39 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 69.7%. The rate of technical failure as a reason for non-curative ESD was 25.9% and the oncological failure rate was 74.1% for non-curative ESD. Rescue surgery was performed in 48.2% of indicated cases. The perioperative rate for major complications was 0. The outcome of ESD in the upper GI tract is in line with the published literature, and non-curative ESD does not worsen surgical outcomes. The available follow-up data are in line with the international published literature, showing a low rate of residual malignancy in surgical resection specimens. Therefore, the indication of rescue surgery for oncological failure remains challenging. Furthermore, the learning curve of ESD has shown a trend towards improving outcomes over time.

Background: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has become the standard therapy for early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and has shown as good oncological surgery results. Approximately 30% of ESDs do not meet the criteria for oncological curability, and upfront surgery is indicated. Hence, about 40% of patients with an indication for surgery are advised against surgery because of comorbidities and an advanced age. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study on the long-term outcomes of non-curative ESDs, performed between 2009 and May 2024, without additional tumor therapy. The primary outcome was the recurrence of malignancy, either local malignancy or lymph node metastasis during follow-up, or death. We compared the outcomes between two cohorts: after non-curative ESD (ncESD) and after curative ESD (cESD). Results: A total of 374 ESDs were analyzed in this study. Overall, the technical success rate was 91%, and the oncological curative resection criteria were met in 70.9% of patients. Severe complications occurred in 5% of cases without procedure-associated mortality. In the ncESD group, 20% (7/35) of patients had a recurrence of malignancy primarily due to positive horizontal margins in the resection specimens, and 3 out of 35 died due to a non-oncological reason during the follow-up (mean length 36.6 months). In the cESD group, 3% (1/33) of patients had tumor recurrence, and 1 patient died because of a non-oncological reason. The tumor recurrence rate between the cohorts was significant (p = 0.017), and overall mortality did not show significance (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Especially in the elderly and multimorbid patients, the recommendation to perform rescue surgery after non-curative ESD remains challenging. Residual malignancy rates in surgical resection specimens are low, recurrence rates of malignancy are low, and mortality rates for non-oncological reasons are high in this population. There is a need for more data for the individualization of patient management after non-curative ESD.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early upper gastrointestinal (GI) carcinomas. While technically demanding, it offers, in experienced hands, definitive local therapy for early GI neoplasia by allowing complete En bloc resection of mucosal and superficially invasive neoplasms, thus enabling precise histopathological risk stratification and organ preservation. Appropriate patient selection relies on meticulous endoscopic assessment using high-definition and image-enhanced endoscopy to define lesion boundaries and predict invasion depth. The principal indications include high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early carcinomas without endoscopic evidence of deep submucosal invasion or lymph node metastasis risk factors. Pathological analysis of the resection specimens includes histological typing and grading per WHO classification and precise assessment of invasion depth—in case of submucosal invasion measurement in micrometers—and evaluation of margin status and lymphovascular invasion. The presence of risk factors such as deep invasion in the submucosa, poor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion may require additional surgery, guided by validated risk scores such as the eCura system. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and pathological practices for ESD in upper GI lesions. This includes the discussion of technical and biological challenges and the need of accurate assessment of risk factors for systemic metastatic spread and local recurrence as a limitation for this sophisticated but highly effective therapeutic method.