Background: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has become the standard therapy for early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and has shown as good oncological surgery results. Approximately 30% of ESDs do not meet the criteria for oncological curability, and upfront surgery is indicated. Hence, about 40% of patients with an indication for surgery are advised against surgery because of comorbidities and an advanced age. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study on the long-term outcomes of non-curative ESDs, performed between 2009 and May 2024, without additional tumor therapy. The primary outcome was the recurrence of malignancy, either local malignancy or lymph node metastasis during follow-up, or death. We compared the outcomes between two cohorts: after non-curative ESD (ncESD) and after curative ESD (cESD). Results: A total of 374 ESDs were analyzed in this study. Overall, the technical success rate was 91%, and the oncological curative resection criteria were met in 70.9% of patients. Severe complications occurred in 5% of cases without procedure-associated mortality. In the ncESD group, 20% (7/35) of patients had a recurrence of malignancy primarily due to positive horizontal margins in the resection specimens, and 3 out of 35 died due to a non-oncological reason during the follow-up (mean length 36.6 months). In the cESD group, 3% (1/33) of patients had tumor recurrence, and 1 patient died because of a non-oncological reason. The tumor recurrence rate between the cohorts was significant (p = 0.017), and overall mortality did not show significance (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Especially in the elderly and multimorbid patients, the recommendation to perform rescue surgery after non-curative ESD remains challenging. Residual malignancy rates in surgical resection specimens are low, recurrence rates of malignancy are low, and mortality rates for non-oncological reasons are high in this population. There is a need for more data for the individualization of patient management after non-curative ESD.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early upper gastrointestinal (GI) carcinomas. While technically demanding, it offers, in experienced hands, definitive local therapy for early GI neoplasia by allowing complete En bloc resection of mucosal and superficially invasive neoplasms, thus enabling precise histopathological risk stratification and organ preservation. Appropriate patient selection relies on meticulous endoscopic assessment using high-definition and image-enhanced endoscopy to define lesion boundaries and predict invasion depth. The principal indications include high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early carcinomas without endoscopic evidence of deep submucosal invasion or lymph node metastasis risk factors. Pathological analysis of the resection specimens includes histological typing and grading per WHO classification and precise assessment of invasion depth—in case of submucosal invasion measurement in micrometers—and evaluation of margin status and lymphovascular invasion. The presence of risk factors such as deep invasion in the submucosa, poor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion may require additional surgery, guided by validated risk scores such as the eCura system. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and pathological practices for ESD in upper GI lesions. This includes the discussion of technical and biological challenges and the need of accurate assessment of risk factors for systemic metastatic spread and local recurrence as a limitation for this sophisticated but highly effective therapeutic method.

Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for the removal of neoplastic benign and early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we analyse the success and safety of rectal ESD at Linz hospitals, focusing on a specific endoscopist. Additionally, we examine whether there is a learning curve regarding success parameters. Methods: This retrospective study included all 102 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of the rectum by a defined endoscopist at Ordensklinikum Hospital and Kepler University Hospital between December 2010 and May 2021. With the collected data, a descriptive statistic was carried out and regression analyses were performed. Results: The en bloc resection rate was 78.4% and the rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue was 55.6%. The average procedure time was 179 min and the complication rate was 7.8%. In total, 26.4% of cases showed carcinoma; in 25.9% of these cases, an oncologically curative resection was achieved with ESD. Follow-up data were available for 61.1% of cases, with recurrence being diagnosed in 3.6% of cases. A learning curve was observed regarding the rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue and the procedure time, but not regarding the en bloc resection rate. Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a safe method for the removal of large rectal adenomas and early carcinomas. The en bloc resection rate of the analysed procedures is within the range of comparable European studies. The rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue is below the R0 resection rate of the comparative literature; however, a learning curve could be observed in this parameter.

Background/Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a state-of-the-art en bloc resection for early gastro-intestinal cancers and precursors developed and validated in Japan. Western expertise with this complex technique remains limited. Tutored training might be optimal for patients and ESD learning. We established ESD tutoring courses led by experienced Japanese experts to provide (i) optimal long-term curative outcomes and low complication rates for patients and (ii) hands-on training on difficult lesions for European endoscopists under direct expert supervision. Methods: Prospective data from 2011 to 2015 (follow-up to 12/2024) were analyzed. A total of 118 neoplasms (50% HGIEN and cancer) in 101 patients (median age 68 [37–91] years; 38% with significant comorbidities) were treated with expert or tutored ESD. Japanese experts performed 28 ESDs, while 22 trained beginners conducted 90 supervised procedures on difficult lesions during 5 live and 20 tutoring events (1–4 days each). Results: Analysis of the complete data showed curative and en bloc resection rates of 88% and 95%, respectively, with no recurrence after R0 resections during a median follow-up of 9.8 [1.5–14.9] years. Long-term survival remained recurrence-free after endoscopic resection of 3 recurrent adenomas (at R1/Rx) and curative surgery/2nd ESD for 5 non-curative ESDs. Adverse events occurred in 9.3% without emergency surgery or 30-day mortality. Comparing expert-only vs. tutored ESD procedures, beginners correctly applied curative ESD indications in 94% of 118 neoplasms. Experts resected larger lesions (22 cm²) at a rate of 9.3 cm²/h in 121 min. Tutored beginners achieved a 75% [25–100] self-completion rate on 33% smaller lesions in 112 min. Conclusions: ESD tutoring courses led by Japanese experts ensure excellent patient outcomes and standardized procedural training. This model may foster professional ESD performance across European referral centers.