Kevin Conway

Dr. Kevin Conway

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 March 2013 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWSandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub
SDSureyya S. Dikmen
Sureyya S. Dikmen
RHRobert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton
DTDavid S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky
PZPhilip D. Zelazo
Philip D. Zelazo
RGRichard C. Gershon
Richard C. Gershon
Cognition is 1 of 4 domains measured by the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function (NIH-TB), and complements modules testing motor function, sensation, and emotion. On the basis of expert panels, the cognition subdomains identified as most important for health, success in school and work, and independence in daily functioning were Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Language, Processing Speed, Working Memory, and Attention. Seven measures were designed to tap constructs within these subdomains. The instruments were validated in English, in a sample of 476 participants ranging in age from 3 to 85 years, with representation from both sexes, 3 racial/ethnic categories, and 3 levels of education. This report describes the development of the Cognition Battery and presents results on test-retest reliability, age effects on performance, and convergent and discriminant construct validity. The NIH-TB Cognition Battery is intended to serve as a brief, convenient set of measures to supplement other outcome measures in epidemiologic and longitudinal research and clinical trials. With a computerized format and national standardization, this battery will provide a “common currency” among researchers for comparisons across a wide range of studies and populations.

1 November 2019 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDonald J. Hagler
Donald J. Hagler
SHSeanN. Hatton
SeanN. Hatton
MCM. Daniela Cornejo
M. Daniela Cornejo
CMCarolina Makowski
Carolina Makowski
DFDamien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair
ADAnders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale

8 August 2016 in Tobacco Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAndrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland
BABridget K Ambrose
Bridget K Ambrose
KCKevin Conway
Kevin Conway
NBNicolette Borek
Nicolette Borek
ELElizabeth Lambert
Elizabeth Lambert
WCWilson M Compton
Wilson M Compton
Background This paper describes the methods and conceptual framework for Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data collection. The National Institutes of Health, through the National Institute on Drug Abuse, is partnering with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products to conduct the PATH Study under a contract with Westat. Methods The PATH Study is a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study of 45 971 adults and youth in the USA, aged 12 years and older. Wave 1 was conducted from 12 September 2013 to 15 December 2014 using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing to collect information on tobacco-use patterns, risk perceptions and attitudes towards current and newly emerging tobacco products, tobacco initiation, cessation, relapse behaviours and health outcomes. The PATH Study's design allows for the longitudinal assessment of patterns of use of a spectrum of tobacco products, including initiation, cessation, relapse and transitions between products, as well as factors associated with use patterns. Additionally, the PATH Study collects biospecimens from consenting adults aged 18 years and older and measures biomarkers of exposure and potential harm related to tobacco use. Conclusions The cumulative, population-based data generated over time by the PATH Study will contribute to the evidence base to inform FDA's regulatory mission under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act and efforts to reduce the Nation's burden of tobacco-related death and disease.

26 January 2017 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKarin Kasza
Karin Kasza
BABridget K. Ambrose
Bridget K. Ambrose
KCKevin Conway
Kevin Conway
NBNicolette Borek
Nicolette Borek
KTKristie Taylor
Kristie Taylor
AHAndrew J. Hyland
Andrew J. Hyland
Noncigarette tobacco products are evolving rapidly, with increasing popularity in the United States. We present prevalence estimates for 12 types of tobacco products, using data from 45,971 adult and youth participants (≥12 years of age) from Wave 1 (September 2013 through December 2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a large, nationally representative, longitudinal study of tobacco use and health in the United States. Participants were asked about their use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, traditional cigars, cigarillos, filtered cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah, snus pouches, other smokeless tobacco, dissolvable tobacco, bidis, and kreteks. Estimates of the prevalence of use for each product were determined according to use category (e.g., current use or use in the previous 30 days) and demographic subgroup, and the prevalence of multiple-product use was explored. More than a quarter (27.6%) of adults were current users of at least one type of tobacco product in 2013 and 2014, although the prevalence varied depending on use category. A total of 8.9% of youths had used a tobacco product in the previous 30 days; 1.6% of youths were daily users. Approximately 40% of tobacco users, adults and youths alike, used multiple tobacco products; cigarettes plus e-cigarettes was the most common combination. Young adults (18 to 24 years of age), male adults and youths, members of racial minorities, and members of sexual minorities generally had higher use of tobacco than their counterparts. During this study, 28% of U.S. adults were current users of tobacco, and 9% of youths had used tobacco in the previous 30 days. Use of multiple products was common among tobacco users. These findings will serve as baseline data to examine between-person differences and within-person changes over time in the use of tobacco products. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Food and Drug Administration.)

6 May 2010 in Addiction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJoel Swendsen
Joel Swendsen
KCKevin Conway
Kevin Conway
LDLouisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt
MGMeyer Glantz
Meyer Glantz
RJRobert Jin
Robert Jin
RKRonald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler

1 January 2014 in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRobert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton
NANatacha Akshoomoff
Natacha Akshoomoff
DTDavid Tulsky
David Tulsky
DMDan Mungas
Dan Mungas
SWSandra Weintraub
Sandra Weintraub
RGRichard Gershon
Richard Gershon
This study describes psychometric properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) Composite Scores in an adult sample. The NIHTB-CB was designed for use in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for ages 3 to 85. A total of 268 self-described healthy adults were recruited at four university-based sites, using stratified sampling guidelines to target demographic variability for age (20–85 years), gender, education, and ethnicity. The NIHTB-CB contains seven computer-based instruments assessing five cognitive sub-domains: Language, Executive Function, Episodic Memory, Processing Speed, and Working Memory. Participants completed the NIHTB-CB, corresponding gold standard validation measures selected to tap the same cognitive abilities, and sociodemographic questionnaires. Three Composite Scores were derived for both the NIHTB-CB and gold standard batteries: “Crystallized Cognition Composite,” “Fluid Cognition Composite,” and “Total Cognition Composite” scores. NIHTB Composite Scores showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas=0.84 Crystallized, 0.83 Fluid, 0.77 Total), excellent test–retest reliability (r: 0.86–0.92), strong convergent (r: 0.78–0.90) and discriminant (r: 0.19–0.39) validities versus gold standard composites, and expected age effects (r=0.18 crystallized, r=−0.68 fluid, r=−0.26 total). Significant relationships with self-reported prior school difficulties and current health status, employment, and presence of a disability provided evidence of external validity. The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery Composite Scores have excellent reliability and validity, suggesting they can be used effectively in epidemiologic and clinical studies. (JINS, 2014, 20, 1–11)