Karin Kasza

Ms. Karin Kasza

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2017 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKarin Kasza
Karin Kasza
BABridget K. Ambrose
Bridget K. Ambrose
KCKevin Conway
Kevin Conway
NBNicolette Borek
Nicolette Borek
KTKristie Taylor
Kristie Taylor
AHAndrew J. Hyland
Andrew J. Hyland
Noncigarette tobacco products are evolving rapidly, with increasing popularity in the United States. We present prevalence estimates for 12 types of tobacco products, using data from 45,971 adult and youth participants (≥12 years of age) from Wave 1 (September 2013 through December 2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a large, nationally representative, longitudinal study of tobacco use and health in the United States. Participants were asked about their use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, traditional cigars, cigarillos, filtered cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah, snus pouches, other smokeless tobacco, dissolvable tobacco, bidis, and kreteks. Estimates of the prevalence of use for each product were determined according to use category (e.g., current use or use in the previous 30 days) and demographic subgroup, and the prevalence of multiple-product use was explored. More than a quarter (27.6%) of adults were current users of at least one type of tobacco product in 2013 and 2014, although the prevalence varied depending on use category. A total of 8.9% of youths had used a tobacco product in the previous 30 days; 1.6% of youths were daily users. Approximately 40% of tobacco users, adults and youths alike, used multiple tobacco products; cigarettes plus e-cigarettes was the most common combination. Young adults (18 to 24 years of age), male adults and youths, members of racial minorities, and members of sexual minorities generally had higher use of tobacco than their counterparts. During this study, 28% of U.S. adults were current users of tobacco, and 9% of youths had used tobacco in the previous 30 days. Use of multiple products was common among tobacco users. These findings will serve as baseline data to examine between-person differences and within-person changes over time in the use of tobacco products. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Food and Drug Administration.)

28 December 2021 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKarin Kasza
Karin Kasza
KEKathryn C. Edwards
Kathryn C. Edwards
HKHeather L. Kimmel
Heather L. Kimmel
AAAndrew Anesetti-Rothermel
Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel
KCK. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings
AHAndrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland
Most published studies that investigate whether use of electronic nicotine delivery products (e-cigarettes) can help cigarette smokers quit smoking have been restricted to smokers who are planning to quit, or they have not considered smokers’ quit intentions.1 However, a recent study using data from the US nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study looked at daily cigarette smokers who were not planning to ever quit smoking and found that subsequent daily use of e-cigarettes was positively associated with change in intentions to quit cigarette use.2 A long-standing theory suggests that taking even a first step toward contemplating quitting smoking can have a positive impact on net cigarette cessation rates3; thus, evaluation of factors associated with cigarette discontinuation among smokers not planning to quit is important to understanding the range of potential impacts of e-cigarette use on net cigarette cessation. In this study, we assessed whether use of e-cigarettes was associated with cigarette discontinuation among adult daily cigarette smokers who were initially not planning to ever quit smoking and were initially not using e-cigarettes. We used 4 waves of PATH Study data collected in 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2018-2019 to extend the population-based e-cigarette use and cigarette discontinuation literature to include this segment of the smoking population.

14 August 2012 in Addiction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKarin Kasza
Karin Kasza
AHAndrew J. Hyland
Andrew J. Hyland
RBRon Borland
Ron Borland
AMAnn Mcneill
Ann Mcneill
MBMaansi Bansal‐Travers
Maansi Bansal‐Travers
KCK. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings

2 September 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJohn Pierce
John Pierce
TBTarik Benmarhnia
Tarik Benmarhnia
RCRuifeng Chen
Ruifeng Chen
MWMartha White
Martha White
DADavid B. Abrams
David B. Abrams
KMKaren Messer
Karen Messer
More smokers report using e-cigarettes to help them quit than FDA-approved pharmacotherapy. To assess the association of e-cigarettes with future abstinence from cigarette and tobacco use. Cohort study of US sample, with annual follow-up. US adult (ages 18+) daily cigarette smokers identified at Wave 1 (W1; 2013–14) of the PATH Study, who reported a quit attempt before W2 and completed W3 (n = 2443). Use of e-cigarettes, pharmacotherapy (including nicotine replacement therapy), or no product for last quit attempt (LQA), and current daily e-cigarette use at W2. Propensity score matching (PSM) of groups using different methods to quit. 12+ months abstinence at W3 from cigarettes and from all tobacco (including e-cigarettes). 30+ days abstinence at W3 was a secondary outcome. Among daily smokers with an LQA, 23.5% used e-cigarettes, 19.3% used pharmacotherapy only (including NRT) and 57.2% used no product. Cigarette abstinence for 12+ months at W3 was ~10% in each group. Half of the cigarette abstainers in the e-cigarette group were using e-cigarettes at W3. Different methods to help quitting had statistically comparable 12+ month cigarette abstinence at W3 (e-cigarettes vs no product: Risk Difference (RD) = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.06; e-cigarettes vs pharmacotherapy: RD = 0.02, 95% CI:-0.04 to 0.09). Likewise, daily e-cigarette users at W2 did not show a cessation benefit over comparable no-e-cigarette users and this finding was robust to sensitivity analyses. Abstinence for 30+ days at W3 was also similar across products. The frequency of e-cigarette use during the LQA was not assessed, nor was it possible to assess continuous abstinence from the LQA. Among US daily smokers who quit cigarettes in 2014–15, use of e-cigarettes in that attempt compared to approved cessation aids or no products showed similar abstinence rates 1–2 years later.

22 April 2020 in Tobacco Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCassandra A Stanton
Cassandra A Stanton
ESEva Sharma
Eva Sharma
KEKATHRYN EDWARDS
KATHRYN EDWARDS
MHMichael Halenar
Michael Halenar
KTKristie Taylor
Kristie Taylor
AHAndrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland
Objective Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; including e-cigarettes) are rapidly evolving in the US marketplace. This study reports cross-sectional prevalence and longitudinal pathways of ENDS use across 3 years, among US youth (12–17 years), young adults (18–24 years) and adults 25+ (25 years and older). Design Data were from the first three waves (2013–2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study of US youth and adults. Respondents with data at all three waves (youth, n=11 046; young adults, n=6478; adults 25+, n=17 188) were included in longitudinal analyses. Results Weighted cross-sectional ever use of ENDS increased at each wave. Across all three waves, young adults had the highest percentages of past 12-month, past 30-day (P30D) and daily P30D ENDS use compared with youth and adults 25+. Only about a quarter of users had persistent P30D ENDS use at each wave. Most ENDS users were polytobacco users. Exclusive Wave 1 ENDS users had a higher proportion of subsequent discontinued any tobacco use compared with polytobacco ENDS users who also used cigarettes. Conclusions ENDS use is most common among young adults compared with youth and adults 25+. However, continued use of ENDS over 2 years is not common for any age group. Health education efforts to reduce the appeal and availability of ENDS products might focus on reducing ENDS experimentation, and on reaching the smaller subgroups of daily ENDS users to better understand their reasons for use.

22 April 2020 in Tobacco Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKarin Kasza
Karin Kasza
KEKATHRYN EDWARDS
KATHRYN EDWARDS
ZTZhiqun Tang
Zhiqun Tang
CSCassandra A Stanton
Cassandra A Stanton
ESEva Sharma
Eva Sharma
AHAndrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland
Objective To report on demographic and tobacco product use correlates of tobacco product initiation (cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), cigars, hookah and smokeless tobacco) among the US population. Design Data were from the first three waves (2013–2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study of US youth (aged 12–17 years) and adults (aged 18+ years). Never users of at least one type of tobacco product at Wave 1 (W1, 2013/14) or Wave 2 (W2, 2014/15) were included (n=12 987 youth; n=25 116 adults). Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between demographic and tobacco product use characteristics at baseline, and tobacco product initiation at follow-up (ever, past 30 day (P30D), frequent (use on 20 or more of thepast 30 days)) over two 1-year periods (W1–W2 and W2–Wave 3). Results Youth aged 15–17 years were more likely than youth aged 12–14 years and adults aged 18–24 years were more likely than older adults to initiate P30D tobacco use across products; non-heterosexuals were more likely than heterosexuals to initiate P30D cigarette and ENDS use. Older adults were more likely than young adults, and males were more likely than females, to be frequent users of ENDS on initiation. Ever use of another tobacco product predicted P30D initiation of each tobacco product. Discussion Other tobacco product use and age predict P30D tobacco initiation across products whereas associations with other demographic characteristics vary by product. Continued contemporary evaluation of initiation rates within the changing tobacco product marketplace is important.