Pavel Kraikivski

Dr. Pavel Kraikivski

Academy of Integrated Science, Division of Systems Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in Developmental Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexis J. Lomakin
Alexis J. Lomakin
ISIrina Semenova
Irina Semenova
IZIlya Zaliapin
Ilya Zaliapin
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski
ENElena Nadezhdina
Elena Nadezhdina
VRVladimir Rodionov
Vladimir Rodionov

1 August 2009 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
INIgor L. Novak
Igor L. Novak
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski
BSBoris M. Slepchenko
Boris M. Slepchenko

29 June 2006 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski
RLReinhard Lipowsky
Reinhard Lipowsky
JKJan Kierfeld
Jan Kierfeld
We theoretically study the cooperative behavior of cytoskeletal filaments in motility assays in which immobilized motor proteins bind the filaments to substrate surfaces and actively pull them along these surfaces. Because of the mutual exclusion of the filaments, the coupled dynamics of filaments, motor heads, and motor tails leads to a nonequilibrium phase transition which generalizes the isotropic-nematic phase transition of the corresponding equilibrium system, the hard-rod fluid. Langevin dynamics simulations show that the motor activity enhances the tendency for nematic ordering. We develop a quantitative theory for the location of the phase boundary as a function of motor density. At high detachment forces of motors, we also observe filament clusters arising from blocking effects.

10 December 2015 in npj Systems Biology and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski
KCKatherine C Chen
Katherine C Chen
TLTeeraphan Laomettachit
Teeraphan Laomettachit
TMT M Murali
T M Murali
John J. TysonJohn J. Tyson
John J. Tyson
In the cell division cycle of budding yeast, START refers to a set of tightly linked events that prepare a cell for budding and DNA replication, and FINISH denotes the interrelated events by which the cell exits from mitosis and divides into mother and daughter cells. On the basis of recent progress made by molecular biologists in characterizing the genes and proteins that control START and FINISH, we crafted a new mathematical model of cell cycle progression in yeast. Our model exploits a natural separation of time scales in the cell cycle control network to construct a system of differential-algebraic equations for protein synthesis and degradation, post-translational modifications, and rapid formation and dissociation of multimeric complexes. The model provides a unified account of the observed phenotypes of 257 mutant yeast strains (98% of the 263 strains in the data set used to constrain the model). We then use the model to predict the phenotypes of 30 novel combinations of mutant alleles. Our comprehensive model of the molecular events controlling cell cycle progression in budding yeast has both explanatory and predictive power. Future experimental tests of the model’s predictions will be useful to refine the underlying molecular mechanism, to constrain the adjustable parameters of the model, and to provide new insights into how the cell division cycle is regulated in budding yeast.

9 December 2021 in npj Systems Biology and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYongwoon Jung
Yongwoon Jung
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski
SSSajad Shafiekhani
Sajad Shafiekhani
STScott S. Terhune
Scott S. Terhune
RDRanjan K Dash
Ranjan K Dash
Different cancer cell lines can have varying responses to the same perturbations or stressful conditions. Cancer cells that have DNA damage checkpoint-related mutations are often more sensitive to gene perturbations including altered Plk1 and p53 activities than cancer cells without these mutations. The perturbations often induce a cell cycle arrest in the former cancer, whereas they only delay the cell cycle progression in the latter cancer. To study crosstalk between Plk1, p53, and G2/M DNA damage checkpoint leading to differential cell cycle regulations, we developed a computational model by extending our recently developed model of mitotic cell cycle and including these key interactions. We have used the model to analyze the cancer cell cycle progression under various gene perturbations including Plk1-depletion conditions. We also analyzed mutations and perturbations in approximately 1800 different cell lines available in the Cancer Dependency Map and grouped lines by genes that are represented in our model. Our model successfully explained phenotypes of various cancer cell lines under different gene perturbations. Several sensitivity analysis approaches were used to identify the range of key parameter values that lead to the cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. Our resulting model can be used to predict the effect of potential treatments targeting key mitotic and DNA damage checkpoint regulators on cell cycle progression of different types of cancer cells.

1 February 2019 in Journal of Theoretical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
John J. TysonJohn J. Tyson
John J. Tyson
TLTeeraphan Laomettachit
Teeraphan Laomettachit
Pavel KraikivskiPavel Kraikivski
Pavel Kraikivski