William White

Dr. William White

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 January 2014 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NDNicholas K Dulvy
Nicholas K Dulvy
SFSarah L Fowler
Sarah L Fowler
JMJohn A Musick
John A Musick
RCRachel D Cavanagh
Rachel D Cavanagh
PKPeter Matthew Kyne
Peter Matthew Kyne
WWWilliam White
William White
The rapid expansion of human activities threatens ocean-wide biodiversity. Numerous marine animal populations have declined, yet it remains unclear whether these trends are symptomatic of a chronic accumulation of global marine extinction risk. We present the first systematic analysis of threat for a globally distributed lineage of 1,041 chondrichthyan fishes—sharks, rays, and chimaeras. We estimate that one-quarter are threatened according to IUCN Red List criteria due to overfishing (targeted and incidental). Large-bodied, shallow-water species are at greatest risk and five out of the seven most threatened families are rays. Overall chondrichthyan extinction risk is substantially higher than for most other vertebrates, and only one-third of species are considered safe. Population depletion has occurred throughout the world’s ice-free waters, but is particularly prevalent in the Indo-Pacific Biodiversity Triangle and Mediterranean Sea. Improved management of fisheries and trade is urgently needed to avoid extinctions and promote population recovery.

21 June 2012 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GNG. J. P. Naylor
G. J. P. Naylor
JCJ. N. Caira
J. N. Caira
KJK. Jensen
K. Jensen
KRK. A. M. Rosana
K. A. M. Rosana
WWWilliam White
William White
PLP. R. Last
P. R. Last
In an effort to provide a framework for the accurate identification of elasmobranchs, driven in large part by the needs of parasitological studies, a comprehensive survey of DNA sequences derived from the mitochondrial NADH2 gene was conducted for elasmobranchs collected from around the world. Analysis was based on sequences derived from 4283 specimens representing an estimated 574 (of ∼1221) species (305 sharks, 269 batoids), each represented by 1 to 176 specimens, in 157 (of 193 described) elasmobranch genera in 56 (of 57 described) families of elasmobranchs (only Hypnidae was not represented). A total of 1921 (44.9%) of the samples were represented by vouchers and/or images available in an online host specimen database (http://elasmobranchs.tapewormdb.uconn.edu). A representative sequence for each of the 574 species identified in this survey, as well as an additional 11 sequences for problematic complexes, has been deposited in GenBank. Neighbor-joining analysis of the data revealed a substant...

8 December 2010 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
WWWilliam White
William White
DGDaniel C. Gledhill
Daniel C. Gledhill
AHAlistair J. Hobday
Alistair J. Hobday
RBRebecca Brown
Rebecca Brown
GPGretta Pecl
Gretta Pecl

23 May 2014 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRL. A. Rocha
L. A. Rocha
AAAlexandre Silva Aleixo
Alexandre Silva Aleixo
GAG. Allen
G. Allen
FAF. Almeda
F. Almeda
CBC. C. Baldwin
C. C. Baldwin
CWC. C. Witt
C. C. Witt

25 January 2008 in Marine and Freshwater Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWRobert D. Ward
Robert D. Ward
BHBronwyn H. Holmes
Bronwyn H. Holmes
WWWilliam White
William White
PLPeter R. Last
Peter R. Last
DNA barcoding – sequencing a region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene (cox1) – promises a rapid and accurate means of species identification, and of any life history stage. For sharks and rays, it may offer a ready means of identifying legal or illegal shark catches, including shark fins taken for the profitable shark fin market. Here it is shown that an analysis of sequence variability in a 655 bp region of cox1 from 945 specimens of 210 chondrichthyan species from 36 families permits the discrimination of 99.0% of these species. Only the two stingarees Urolophus sufflavus and U. cruciatus could not be separated, although these could be readily distinguished from eight other congeners. The average Kimura 2 parameter distance separating individuals within species was 0.37%, and the average distance separating species within genera was 7.48%. Two specimens that clustered with congeners rather than with their identified species-cluster were noted: these could represent instances of hybridisation (although this has not be documented for chondrichthyans), misidentification or mislabelling. It is concluded that cox1 barcoding can be used to identify shark and ray species with a very high degree of accuracy. The sequence variability characteristics of individuals of five species (Aetomylaeus nichofii, Dasyatis kuhlii, Dasyatis leylandi, Himantura gerrardi and Orectolobus maculatus) were consistent with cryptic speciation, and it is suggested that these five taxa be subjected to detailed taxonomic examination to confirm or refute this suggestion. The present barcoding study holds out great hope for the ready identification of sharks, shark products and shark fins, and also highlights some taxonomic issues that need to be investigated further.

24 June 2011 in Marine and Freshwater Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSC. A. Simpfendorfer
C. A. Simpfendorfer
MHM. R. Heupel
M. R. Heupel
WWWilliam White
William White
NDN. K. Dulvy
N. K. Dulvy
Growing concern for the world’s shark and ray populations is driving the need for greater research to inform conservation management. A change in public perception, from one that we need to protect humans from sharks to one where we must protect sharks from humans, has added to calls for better management. The present paper examines the growing need for research for conservation management of sharks and rays by synthesising information presented in this Special Issue from the 2010 Sharks International Conference and by identifying future research needs, including topics such as taxonomy, life history, population status, spatial ecology, environmental effects, ecosystem role and human impacts. However, this biological and ecological research agenda will not be sufficient to fully secure conservation management. There is also a need for research to inform social and economic sustainability. Effective conservation management will be achieved by setting clear priorities for research with the aid of stakeholders, implementing well designed research projects, building the capacity for research, and clearly communicating the results to stakeholders. If this can be achieved, it will assure a future for this iconic group, the ecosystems in which they occur and the human communities that rely on them.