Peter Robert Last

Dr. Peter Robert Last


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 December 2010 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
WWWilliam White
William White
DGDaniel C. Gledhill
Daniel C. Gledhill
AHAlistair J. Hobday
Alistair J. Hobday
RBRebecca Brown
Rebecca Brown
GPGretta Pecl
Gretta Pecl

21 July 2016 in Zootaxa
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
GNGavin Naylor
Gavin Naylor
BMB. Mabel Manjaji-Matsumoto
B. Mabel Manjaji-Matsumoto
The higher-level taxonomy of the stingrays (Dasyatidae) has never been comprehensively reviewed. Recent phylogenetic studies, supported by morphological data, have provided evidence that the group is monophyletic and consists of four major subgroups, the subfamilies Dasyatinae, Neotrygoninae, Urogymninae and Hypolophinae. A morphologically based review of 89 currently recognised species, undertaken for a guide to the world’s rays, indicated that most of the currently recognised dasyatid genera are not monophyletic groups. These findings were supported by molecular analyses using the NADH2 gene for about 77 of these species, and this topology is supported by preliminary analyses base on whole mitochondrial genome comparisons. These molecular analyses, based on data generated from the Chondrichthyan Tree of Life project, are the most taxon-rich data available for this family. Material from all of the presently recognised genera (Dasyatis, Pteroplatytrygon and Taeniurops [Dasyatinae]; Neotrygon and Taeniura [Neotrygoninae]; Himantura and Urogymnus [Urogymninae]; and Makararaja and Pastinachus [Hypolophinae]), are included and their validity largely supported. Urogymnus and the two most species rich genera, Dasyatis and Himantura, are not considered to be monophyletic and were redefined based on external morphology. Seven new genus-level taxa are erected (Megatrygon and Telatrygon [Dasyatinae]; Brevitrygon, Fluvitrygon, Fontitrygon, Maculabatis and Pateobatis [Urogymninae], and an additional three (Bathytoshia, Hemitrygon and Hypanus [Dasyatinae]) are resurrected from the synonymy of Dasyatis. The monotypic genus Megatrygon clustered with ‘amphi-American Himantura’ outside the Dasyatidae, and instead as the sister group of the Potamotrygonidae and Urotrygonidae. Megatrygon is provisionally retained in the Dasyatinae pending further investigation of its internal anatomy. The morphologically divergent groups, Bathytoshia and Pteroplatytrygon, possibly form a single monophyletic group so further investigation is needed to confirm the validity of Pteroplatytrygon. A reclassification of the family Dasyatidae is provided and the above taxa are defined based on new morphological data.

2 June 2016 in Zootaxa
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
BSBernard Seret
Bernard Seret
GNGavin Naylor
Gavin Naylor
A new guitarfish, Rhinobatos borneensis sp. nov., is described from material collected at fish markets in Malaysian Borneo (South China Sea). This ray, which is almost plain coloured with faint orange blotches in adults, has a more colourful embryo marked with small pale ocelli with dark centres. Confused with R. schlegelii (Japan to Taiwan) and its junior synonym R. formosensis, new molecular data suggests it is more closely related to a subgroup of Rhinobatos from the Indo–Malay Archipelago that includes R. jimbaranensis, R. sainsburyi and R. whitei. Based on evidence from recent phylogenetic studies, the genus Rhinobatos is non-monophyletic, nor is the Rhinobatidae a monophyletic family-level group. Former subgenera of Rhinobatos, Acroteriobatus and Glaucostegus, are valid genus-level taxa supported by both morphological and molecular evidence. Moreover, amphi-American members of Rhinobatos, assigned herein to a new genus Pseudobatos, are not monophyletic with Rhinobatos, Acroteriobatus and Glaucostegus and its position within the newly erected order Rhinopristiformes needs to be reassessed. Several molecular studies have suggested that the family Rhinobatidae is polyphyletic and needs to be redefined. We propose a revised classification of the order Rhinopristiformes based on molecular analyses and supported by morphological data, making strong use of oronasal morphology. The group now contains 5 family-level taxa: three valid nominal taxa, Pristidae (2 genera, 5 species), Rhinidae (incorporating Rhynchobatidae, 2 genera, 9 species), Rhinobatidae (3 genera, 31 species); and two new taxa, Glaucostegidae (single genus, 6 species) and Trygonorrhinidae (3 genera, 8 species).

23 February 2016 in Zootaxa
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
WWWilliam White
William White
BSBernard Seret
Bernard Seret
The bluespotted maskray, Neotrygon kuhlii (Müller & Henle, 1841), once thought to be widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific, consists of a complex of several species and the type series consists of multiple species; its nomenclature is discussed. A lectotype and paralectotype are designated and the species rediagnosed based on the types and a fresh specimen from Honiara (Solomon Islands), near to the collection locality of the lectotype (Vanikoro, Solomon Islands). Molecular and morphological data provide confirmatory evidence that this maskray is distinct from some other regional forms. Three members of the complex from the Western Pacific identified in earlier studies are confirmed to be new species; Neotrygon australiae sp. nov. (Australia, New Guinea and eastern Indonesia), N. caeruleopunctata sp. nov. (Indian Ocean), and N. orientale sp. nov. (North-West Pacific). These species differ from each other and N. kuhlii in their adult size, anterior angle of the disc, number and distribution of blue spots on the dorsal disc, and other more subtle morphometric and meristic characters. Another largely plain-coloured Neotrygon, also currently misidentified as N. kuhlii, is sympatric with N. orientale sp. nov. in the South China Sea and off Taiwan. Neotrygon varidens (Garman) is resurrected as the valid name for this ray. A key is provided to species of the genus.

30 January 2007 in Marine and Freshwater Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
Marine and Freshwater Research is an international journal publishing high-quality research and review articles in aquatic science

1 September 2006 in Copeia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHiroyuki Motomura
Hiroyuki Motomura
PLPeter Robert Last
Peter Robert Last
GYGordon K. Yearsley
Gordon K. Yearsley
A new species of scorpionfish, Scorpaena gasta, is described on the basis of five specimens collected from the warm temperate central coast of Western Australia, eastern Indian Ocean, at depths of 3–7 m. Scorpaena gasta is most similar to a Western Australian species, S. sumptuosa. The two species are distinguished from other Indo-Pacific species of Scorpaena by the following combination of characters: lateral surface of maxilla with a distinct longitudinal ridge; relatively thick skin with numerous small sensory pores covering nearly the entire predorsal area to near the first pored lateral-line scale; anteroventral surface of lower jaw with one or two pairs of slender tentacles in ventral view. Scorpaena gasta and S. sumptuosa are separated by four meristic, several morphometric, and color features. Scorpaena gasta is a small species (smallest mature female 67.4 mm SL; largest known specimen 83.6 mm SL), whereas S. sumptuosa is a relatively large species, attaining at least 241 mm SL.