The lack of transparency of powerful Machine Learning systems paired with their growth in popularity over the last decade led to the emergence of the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) field. Instead of focusing solely on obtaining highly performing models, researchers also develop explanation techniques that help better understand the system’s reasoning for a particular output. An explainable system can be designed, developed, and evaluated from different perspectives, which enables researchers from different disciplines to work together on this topic. However, the multidisciplinary nature of XAI systems creates new challenges for condensing and structuring adequate methodologies to design and evaluate such systems. This paper presents a survey of Human-centred and Computer-centred methods to evaluate XAI systems. We propose a new taxonomy to categorize XAI evaluation methods more clearly and intuitively. This categorization gathers knowledge from different disciplines and organizes the evaluation methods according to a set of categories that represent key properties of XAI systems. Possible ways to use the proposed taxonomy in the design and evaluation of XAI systems are also discussed, alongside with some concluding remarks and future directions of research.

An estimated 214 million cases of malaria were detected in 2015, which caused approximately 438 000 deaths. Around 90% of those cases occurred in Africa, where the lack of access to malaria diagnosis is largely due to shortage of expertise and equipment. Thus, the importance to develop new tools that facilitate the rapid and easy diagnosis of malaria for areas with limited access to healthcare services cannot be overstated. This paper presents an image processing and analysis methodology using supervised classification to assess the presence of P.falciparum trophozoites and white blood cells in Giemsa stained thick blood smears. The main differential factor is the usage of microscopic images exclusively acquired with low cost and accessible tools such as smartphones, using a dataset of 194 images manually annotated by an experienced parasilogist

Cervical cancer is the one of the most common cancers in women worldwide, affecting around 570,000 new patients each year. Although there have been great improvements over the years, current screening procedures can still suffer from long and tedious workflows and ambiguities. The increasing interest in the development of computer-aided solutions for cervical cancer screening is to aid with these common practical difficulties, which are especially frequent in the low-income countries where most deaths caused by cervical cancer occur. In this review, an overview of the disease and its current screening procedures is firstly introduced. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of the most relevant computational methods available on the literature for cervical cells analysis is presented. Particularly, this work focuses on topics related to automated quality assessment, segmentation and classification, including an extensive literature review and respective critical discussion. Since the major goal of this timely review is to support the development of new automated tools that can facilitate cervical screening procedures, this work also provides some considerations regarding the next generation of computer-aided diagnosis systems and future research directions.

Microscopy examination has been the pillar of malaria diagnosis, being the recommended procedure when its quality can be maintained. However, the need for trained personnel and adequate equipment limits its availability and accessibility in malaria-endemic areas. Rapid, accurate, accessible diagnostic tools are increasingly required, as malaria control programs extend parasite-based diagnosis and the prevalence decreases. This paper presents an image processing and analysis methodology using supervised classification to assess the presence of malaria parasites and determine the species and life cycle stage in Giemsa-stained thin blood smears. The main differentiation factor is the usage of microscopic images exclusively acquired with low cost and accessible tools such as smartphones, a dataset of 566 images manually annotated by an experienced parasilogist being used. Eight different species-stage combinations were considered in this work, with an automatic detection performance ranging from 73.9% to 96.2% in terms of sensitivity and from 92.6% to 99.3% in terms of specificity. These promising results attest to the potential of using this approach as a valid alternative to conventional microscopy examination, with comparable detection performances and acceptable computational times.

Background: Malaria is a leading cause of death and disease in many developing countries, where young children and pregnant women are the most affected groups. In 2012, there were an estimated 207 million cases of malaria, which caused approximately 627 000 malaria deaths. Around 80% of malaria cases occur in Africa, where the lack of access to malaria diagnosis is largely due to a shortage of expertise, being the shortage of equipment the secondary factor. This lack of expertise for malaria diagnosis frequently results on the increase of false positives, since prescription of medication is based only on symptoms. Thus, there is an urgent need of new tools that can facilitate the rapid and easy diagnosis of malaria, especially in areas with limited access to quality healthcare services. Methods: Various image processing and analysis approaches already proposed on the literature for the detection and segmentation of malaria parasites in blood smear microscopic images were collected and reviewed. This timely review aims to support the increasing interest in the development of low cost tools that can facilitate the rapid and easy diagnosis of malaria, especially in areas with limited access to quality healthcare services. Results: Malaria parasites detection and segmentation techniques in microscopic images are, in general, still in need of improvement and further testing. Most of the methodologies reviewed in this work were tested with a limited number of images, and more studies with significantly larger datasets for the evaluation of the proposed approaches are needed. Despite promising results reported during the past years, the great majority of the computer-aided methods found on the literature for malaria diagnosis are based on images acquired under well controlled conditions and with proper microscopic equipment. However, one should take into account that 80% of malaria cases occur in Africa, where this type of equipment is scarce or even nonexistent in common healthcare facilities. Conclusion: This work collects and reviews various image processing and analysis approaches already proposed on the literature for the detection and segmentation of malaria parasites in blood smear microscopic images. This timely review aims to support the increasing interest in the development of image processing-based systems to be used in rural areas of developing countries, which might be the next future trend in malaria computer-aided diagnosis.

Improving inventory management is essential to retailer profitability. This paper proposes a supervised learning approach for Out-of-Stock (OOS) detection by Texture, Color and Geometry features in high-resolution panoramic images of grocery retail shelves. Cascade classifiers are used to detect labels that can potentially be used to confirm the presence of the OOS cases. The image acquisition setup includes a camera cart that shoots from multi-viewpoints aiming a parallel motion to the shelf. The correction of perspective distortion is applied to handle the different camera translation motions while stitching together images with a high-level of similarity. From the generated panoramas, the proposed OOS detection is followed by classification with Support Vector Machines. The experimental tests were performed throughout the retail environment with real data obtained from supermarket shelves containing labels near the visible ruptures. Results show a detection accuracy of 84.5% for OOS and a sensitivity of 86.6% for label detection.