Kiriaki Chrissopoulou

Dr. Kiriaki Chrissopoulou

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2006 in Macromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MEM. M. Elmahdy
M. M. Elmahdy
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
AAA. Afratis
A. Afratis
GFG. Floudas
G. Floudas
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis

18 November 2011 in Macromolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
KAK. S. Andrikopoulos
K. S. Andrikopoulos
SFS. Fotiadou
S. Fotiadou
SBS. Bollas
S. Bollas
CKC. Karageorgaki
C. Karageorgaki
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis

6 February 2022 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
Emmanuel StratakisEmmanuel Stratakis
Emmanuel Stratakis
PKParaskevi Kavatzikidou
Paraskevi Kavatzikidou
GKGeorgia Kaklamani
Georgia Kaklamani
Anthi RANELLAAnthi RANELLA
Anthi RANELLA
The growth in novel synthesis methods and in the range of possible applications has led to the development of a large variety of manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs), which can, in principle, come into close contact with humans and be dispersed in the environment. The nanomaterials interact with the surrounding environment, this being either the proteins and/or cells in a biological medium or the matrix constituent in a dispersion or composite, and an interface is formed whose properties depend on the physicochemical interactions and on colloidal forces. The development of predictive relationships between the characteristics of individual MNMs and their potential practical use critically depends on how the key parameters of MNMs, such as the size, shape, surface chemistry, surface charge, surface coating, etc., affect the behavior in a test medium. This relationship between the biophysicochemical properties of the MNMs and their practical use is defined as their functionality; understanding this relationship is very important for the safe use of these nanomaterials. In this mini review, we attempt to identify the key parameters of nanomaterials and establish a relationship between these and the main MNM functionalities, which would play an important role in the safe design of MNMs; thus, reducing the possible health and environmental risks early on in the innovation process, when the functionality of a nanomaterial and its toxicity/safety will be taken into account in an integrated way. This review aims to contribute to a decision tree strategy for the optimum design of safe nanomaterials, by going beyond the compromise between functionality and safety.

1 April 2011 in European Polymer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis
Polymer nanocomposites containing layered silicates have been considered as a new generation of composite materials due to their expected unique properties attributed to the high aspect ratio of the inorganic platelets. Nevertheless, addition of layered silicates to polyolefins mostly results in phase separated systems because of the incompatibility of the silicates with the non-polar polyolefins. Functional compatibilizers are required to enhance the interactions and alter the structure from phase separated micro-composites to intercalated and exfoliated nanocomposites. Commercial macromolecular compatibilizers (mainly maleic-anhydride-functionalized polyolefins) are most commonly used to improve the interfacial bonding between the fillers and the polymers whereas specifically synthesized functional homopolymers or copolymers have been utilized as well. In this article, we are reviewing a number of investigations, which studied the influence on the composite structure of various parameters like the compatilizer to inorganic ratio, the type and content of the functional groups and the molecular weight of the functional additive, the miscibility between the matrix polymer and the compatibilizer, the kind of surfactants modifying the inorganic surface, the processing conditions, etc. The most important results obtained utilizing maleic-anhydride-functionalized polyolefins are discussed first, whereas a summary is presented then of the studies performed utilizing other functional oligomers/polymers. X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy studies supported by rheology indicate that the most important factor controlling the structure and the properties is the ratio of functional additive to organoclay whereas the miscibility between the matrix polymer and the compatibilizer is a prerequisite. Keywords Polyolefin nanocomposites Layered silicates Polymeric compatibilizer Intercalation Exfoliation

1 December 2005 in Polymer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
IAI. Altintzi
I. Altintzi
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis
EGE.P. Giannelis
E.P. Giannelis
MPM. Pitsikalis
M. Pitsikalis
NTN. Theophilou
N. Theophilou

1 November 2018 in Polymer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HPHellen Papananou
Hellen Papananou
EPEleni Perivolari
Eleni Perivolari
KCKiriaki Chrissopoulou
Kiriaki Chrissopoulou
Spiros H. AnastasiadisSpiros H. Anastasiadis
Spiros H. Anastasiadis