This paper introduces DAC-HRC, a novel cognitive architecture designed to optimize human-robot collaboration (HRC) in industrial settings, particularly within the context of Industry 4.0. The architecture is grounded in the Distributed Adaptive Control theory and the principles of joint intentionality and interdependence, which are key to effective HRC. Joint intentionality refers to the shared goals and mutual understanding between a human and a robot, while interdependence emphasizes the reliance on each other’s capabilities to complete tasks. DAC-HRC is applied to a hybrid recycling plant for the disassembly and recycling of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) devices. The architecture incorporates several cognitive modules operating at different timescales and abstraction levels, fostering adaptive collaboration that is personalized to each human user. The effectiveness of DAC-HRC is demonstrated through several pilot studies, showcasing functionalities such as turn-taking interaction, personalized error-handling mechanisms, adaptive safety measures, and gesture-based communication. These features enhance human-robot collaboration in the recycling plant by promoting real-time robot adaptation to human needs and preferences. The DAC-HRC architecture aims to contribute to the development of a new HRC paradigm by paving the way for more seamless and efficient collaboration in Industry 4.0 by relying on socially adept cognitive architectures.

What is the role of real-time control and learning in the formation of social conventions? To answer this question, we propose a computational model that matches human behavioral data in a social decision-making game that was analyzed both in discrete-time and continuous-time setups. Furthermore, unlike previous approaches, our model takes into account the role of sensorimotor control loops in embodied decision-making scenarios. For this purpose, we introduce the Control-based Reinforcement Learning (CRL) model. CRL is grounded in the Distributed Adaptive Control (DAC) theory of mind and brain, where low-level sensorimotor control is modulated through perceptual and behavioral learning in a layered structure. CRL follows these principles by implementing a feedback control loop handling the agent’s reactive behaviors (pre-wired reflexes), along with an Adaptive Layer that uses reinforcement learning to maximize long-term reward. We test our model in a multi-agent game-theoretic task in which coordination must be achieved to find an optimal solution. We show that CRL is able to reach human-level performance on standard game-theoretic metrics such as efficiency in acquiring rewards and fairness in reward distribution.

A major challenge in cognitive science and AI has been to understand how intelligent autonomous agents might acquire and predict the behavioral and mental states of other agents in the course of complex social interactions. How does such an agent model the goals, beliefs, and actions of other agents it interacts with? What are the computational principles to model a Theory of Mind (ToM)? Deep learning approaches to address these questions fall short of a better understanding of the problem. In part, this is due to the black-box nature of deep networks, wherein computational mechanisms of ToM are not readily revealed. Here, we consider alternative hypotheses seeking to model how the brain might realize a ToM. In particular, we propose embodied and situated agent models based on distributed adaptive control theory to predict the actions of other agents in five different game-theoretic tasks (Harmony Game, Hawk-Dove, Stag Hunt, Prisoner’s Dilemma, and Battle of the Exes). Our multi-layer control models implement top-down predictions from adaptive to reactive layers of control and bottom-up error feedback from reactive to adaptive layers. We test cooperative and competitive strategies among seven different agent models (cooperative, greedy, tit-for-tat, reinforcement-based, rational, predictive, and internal agents). We show that, compared to pure reinforcement-based strategies, probabilistic learning agents modeled on rational, predictive, and internal phenotypes perform better in game-theoretic metrics across tasks. The outlined autonomous multi-agent models might capture systems-level processes underlying a ToM and suggest architectural principles of ToM from a control-theoretic perspective.

The mammalian hippocampal formation plays a critical role in efficient and flexible navigation. Hippocampal place cells exhibit spatial tuning, characterized by increased firing rates when an animal occupies specific locations in its environment. However, the mechanisms underlying the encoding of spatial information by hippocampal place cells remain not fully understood. Evidence suggests that spatial preferences are shaped by multimodal sensory inputs. Yet, existing hippocampal models typically rely on a single sensory modality, overlooking the role of interoceptive information in the formation of cognitive maps. In this paper, we introduce the Motivational Hippocampal Autoencoder (MoHA), a biologically inspired model that integrates interoceptive (motivational) and exteroceptive (visual) information to generate motivationally modulated cognitive maps. MoHA captures key hippocampal firing properties across different motivational states and, when embedded in a reinforcement learning agent, generates adaptive internal representations that drive goal-directed foraging behavior. Grounded in the principle of biological autonomy, MoHA enables the agent to dynamically adjust its navigation strategies based on internal drives, ensuring that behavior remains flexible and context-dependent. Our results show the benefits of integrating motivational cognitive maps into artificial agents with a varying set of goals, laying the foundation for self-regulated multi-objective reinforcement learning.

Social learning, a cornerstone of cultural evolution, enables individuals to acquire knowledge by observing and imitating others. At the heart of its efficacy lies episodic memory, which encodes specific behavioral sequences to facilitate learning and decision-making. This study explores the interrelation between episodic memory and social learning in collective foraging. Using Sequential Episodic Control (SEC) agents capable of sharing complete behavioral sequences stored in episodic memory, we investigate how variations in the frequency and fidelity of social learning influence collaborative foraging performance. Furthermore, we analyze the effects of social learning on the content and distribution of episodic memories across the group. High-fidelity social learning is shown to consistently enhance resource collection efficiency and distribution, with benefits sustained across memory lengths. In contrast, low-fidelity learning fails to outperform nonsocial learning, spreading diverse but ineffective mnemonic patterns. Novel analyses using mnemonic metrics reveal that high-fidelity social learning also fosters mnemonic group alignment and equitable resource distribution, while low-fidelity conditions increase mnemonic diversity without translating to performance gains. Additionally, we identify an optimal range for episodic memory length in this task, beyond which performance plateaus. These findings underscore the critical effects of social learning on mnemonic group alignment and distribution and highlight the potential of neurocomputational models to probe the cognitive mechanisms driving cultural evolution.