Under the assumption of missing at random, eight confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference between two correlated proportions in the presence of incomplete paired binary data are constructed on the basis of the likelihood ratio statistic, the score statistic, the Wald-type statistic, the hybrid method incorporated with the Wilson score and Agresti–Coull (AC) intervals, and the Bootstrap-resampling method. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the presented CIs in terms of coverage probability and expected interval width. Our empirical results evidence that the Wilson-score-based hybrid CI and the Wald-type CI together with the constrained maximum likelihood estimates perform well for small-to-moderate sample sizes in the sense that (i) their empirical coverage probabilities are quite close to the prespecified confidence level, (ii) their expected interval widths are shorter, and (iii) their ratios of the mesial non-coverage to non-coverage probabilities lie in interval [0.4, 0.6]. An example from a neurological study is used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.

International Press of Boston - publishers of scholarly mathematical and scientific journals and books

International Press of Boston - publishers of scholarly mathematical and scientific journals and books

This paper focuses on a joint model to analyze longitudinal proportional and survival data. We utilize a logit transformation on the longitudinal proportional data and employ a partially linear mixed-effect model. With this model, we estimate the unknown function of time using the B-splines technique. Additionally, we introduce a centered Dirichlet process mixture model (CDPMM) to capture the random effects, allowing for a flexible distribution. The survival data are assumed using a Cox proportional hazard model, and the sharing random effects joint model is developed for the two types of data. We develop a Bayesian Lasso (BLasso) approach that combines the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The proposed method allows for the estimation of unknown parameters and the selection of significant covariates simultaneously. We evaluate the performance of our proposed methods through simulation studies and also provide an illustration of our methodologies using an example from the MA.5 research experiment.

Some existing confidence interval methods and hypothesis testing methods in the analysis of a contingency table with incomplete observations in both margins entirely depend on an underlying assumption that the sampling distribution of the observed counts is a product of independent multinomial/binomial distributions for complete and incomplete counts. However, it can be shown that this independency assumption is incorrect and can result in unreliable conclusions because of the under-estimation of the uncertainty. Therefore, the first objective of this paper is to derive the valid joint sampling distribution of the observed counts in a contingency table with incomplete observations in both margins. The second objective is to provide a new framework for analyzing incomplete contingency tables based on the derived joint sampling distribution of the observed counts by developing a Fisher scoring algorithm to calculate maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of interest, the bootstrap confidence interval methods, and the bootstrap testing hypothesis methods. We compare the differences between the valid sampling distribution and the sampling distribution under the independency assumption. Simulation studies showed that average/expected confidence-interval widths of parameters based on the sampling distribution under the independency assumption are shorter than those based on the new sampling distribution, yielding unrealistic results. A real data set is analyzed to illustrate the application of the new sampling distribution for incomplete contingency tables and the analysis results again confirm the conclusions obtained from the simulation studies.