Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) behavior assessment is a daily challenge for physicians. Modern PNET management varies from a watch-and-wait strategy to surgery depending on tumor aggressiveness. Therefore, the aggressiveness definition plays a pivotal role in the PNET work-up. The aggressiveness of PNETs is mainly based on the dimensions and histological grading, with sometimes a lack of specificity and sensibility. In the last twenty years, EUS has become a cornerstone in the diagnostic phase of PNET management for its high diagnostic yield and the possibility of obtaining a histological specimen. The number of EUS applications in the PNET work-up has been rapidly increasing with new and powerful possibilities. The application of contrast has led to an important step in PNET detection; in recent years, it has been gaining interesting applications in aggressiveness assessment. In this review, we underline the latest experiences and opportunities in the behavior assessment of PNETs using contact-enhanced EUS and contested enhanced harmonic EUS with a particular focus on the future application and possibility that these techniques could provide.

Aims: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) in ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) have become increasingly important for high-risk surgical patients. Our study aims to evaluate the technical and clinical success, safety, and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage using a new dedicated LAMS. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study that included all consecutive patients not suitable for surgery who were referred to a tertiary center for EUS-GBD using a new dedicated electrocautery LAMS for acute cholecystitis at eight different centers. Results: Our study included 54 patients with a mean age of 76.48 years (standard deviation: 12.6 years). Out of the 54 endoscopic gallbladder drainages performed, 24 (44.4%) were cholecysto-gastrostomy, and 30 (55.4%) were cholecysto-duodenostomy. The technical success of LAMS placement was 100%, and clinical success was achieved in 23 out of 30 patients (76.67%). Adverse events were observed in two patients (5.6%). Patients were discharged after a median of 5 days post-stenting. Conclusions: EUS-GBD represents a valuable option for high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. This new dedicated LAMS has demonstrated a high rate of technical and clinical success, along with a high level of safety.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence and prevalence in the general population. Clinical manifestations are heterogenous, and so is the response to medical treatment. Proton pump inhibitors are still the most common agents used to control reflux symptoms and for healing esophagitis, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution for the disease. Patients with persistent troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy, those experiencing some adverse drug reaction, or those unwilling to take lifelong medications deserve valid alternatives. Anti-reflux Nissen fundoplication is an effective option, but the risk of adverse events has limited its spread. In recent years, advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have been made, and three major endoluminal alternatives are now available, including (1) the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the esophago–gastric junction, (2) transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and (3) anti-reflux mucosal interventions (ARMI) based on mucosal resection (ARMS) and mucosal ablation (ARMA) techniques to remodel the cardia. Endoscopic techniques have shown interesting results, but their diffusion is still limited to expert endoscopists in tertiary centers. This review discusses the state of the art in the endoscopic approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Endoscopic ultrasonography represents a crucial aspect of the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The echo-endoscopic features of pancreatic lesions, particularly their contrast behavior with the advent of Contrast-Enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) and Contrast Enhanced Harmonic-EUS (CH-EUS), can predict a lesion’s aggressiveness, depending on its nature. According to this, CH-EUS could be applied to structure an even more dedicated approach to patient care, for example, to ascertain eligibility for surgical intervention of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) or the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cases deemed borderline resectable. In addition to PDAC, other significant issues pertain to the management of small neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). In this context, CH-EUS can be crucial. The aim of this review is to underline the most recent evidence for EUS and CH-EUS applications in pancreatic lesion aggressiveness assessment and to focus on possible future research directions to further extend the application of CH-EUS in this field.

Background Endoscopic papillectomy is a viable treatment option for ampullary lesions. While many studies have reported low morbidity and acceptable outcomes, early attempts to pool data from these initial experiences have produced conflicting conclusions regarding key technical aspects. To address these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary lesions, identifying factors that may influence outcomes. Methods Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase) were searched up to September 2024. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected ampullary lesions were eligible. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were pooled by means of a random-effects model to obtain a proportion with 95 %CI. Subgroup analysis and univariable meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential factors affecting outcomes. Results 61 studies (4935 lesions) published between 2002 and 2024 were analyzed. Complete resection was achieved in 85.9 % of cases, though intraductal involvement limited success. The recurrence rate was 15.2 %; however, the majority of patients (92.4 %) were managed endoscopically without surgery. The pooled adverse event rate was 30.0 %, with bleeding (12.8 %) and post-procedural pancreatitis (11.2 %) being the most common complications. Prophylactic stenting reduced pancreatitis risk, while intraductal involvement increased perforation risk. Adjunctive treatments for intraductal involvement posed an increased risk of papillary stricture. Conclusion Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective treatment for ampullary lesions; however, lesions with intraductal extension pose a higher risk of incomplete resection and perforation, warranting careful evaluation of the benefit–risk balance in these cases. While prophylactic pancreatic stenting may reduce the incidence of post-procedural pancreatitis, optimizing strategies to minimize overall adverse events remains a key focus for future research.

Background and objectives: Biliary drainage(BD)in distal malignant biliary obstruction(DMBO)is often hampered by difficult biliary cannulation(DBC)during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). Advanced cannulation techniques(aERCP)may overcome DBC but still fail in up to 15% of cases, increasing the risk of adverse events(AEs). Early endoscopic ultrasound-guided BD(eEUS-BD)is a potential alternative. The aim of this study is to directly compare safety and efficacy of EUS-BD and aERCP. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicentric study(29 centres in United States, Canada, Europe), including patients with DMBO and common bile duct(CBD)diameter >12 mm, treated up to 2024. DBC cases managed with either eEUS-BD or aERCP were analysed. A 1:2 propensity score-matched cohort was generated to ensure comparability, with regression modeling and inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW)performed as sensitivity analyses. AEs rate was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included BD failure and clinical success. Results: Standard cannulation failed in 2066/10,738(19.2%)ERCPs. aERCP and eEUS-BD were attempted in 1733 and 333 cases, respectively. After matching, 313 patients per EUS-BD group and 626 patients per aERCP group were analyzed. AEs occurred in 18.2% of aERCPs and 9.3% of eEUS-BD(p<0.01), with post-procedural pancreatitis the most frequent AE after aERCP(55 cases, 12.0%). Both regression and IPTW confirmed the robustness of these findings on the entire cohort. Technical success was significantly lower with aERCP(82.0% vs. 95.9%, p<0.01), clinical success was comparable(94.5% vs. 96.4%, p=0.89). Conclusions: In patients with DMBO and dilated CBD, eEUS-BD is associated with fewer AEs and higher technical success than aERCP, supporting its role as a safer, more effective option in DBC.