Background: Whereas the efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) have been confirmed in de novo calcified coronary lesions, little is known about its utility in treating stent underexpansion. This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVL in treating stent underexpansion. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with stent underexpansion treated with IVL entered the multicenter IVL-Dragon Registry. The procedural success (primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as a relative stent expansion >80%. Thirty days device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel myocardial infarction) was the secondary endpoint. A total of 62 patients were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 72.6% of patients. Both stent underexpansion 58.5% (47.5–69.7) vs. 11.4% (5.8–20.7), p < 0.001, and the stenotic area 82.6% (72.4–90.8) vs. 21.5% (11.1–37.2), p < 0.001, measured by quantitative coronary angiography improved significantly after IVL. Intravascular imaging confirmed increased stent expansion following IVL from 37.5% (16.0–66.0) to 86.0% (69.2–90.7), p < 0.001, by optical coherence tomography and from 57.0% (31.5–77.2) to 89.0% (85.0–92.0), p = 0.002, by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary endpoint occurred in one (1.6%) patient caused by cardiac death. There was no target lesion revascularization or target vessel myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: In this real-life, largest-to-date analysis of IVL use to manage underexpanded stent, IVL proved to be an effective and safe method for facilitating stent expansion and increasing luminal gain.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of drug eluting stents (DESs) is currently the default approach for percutaneous coronary interventions, but long-term adverse events still exist. An approach with minimal stenting deserves to be assessed in a randomized trial. We studied a novel sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) that elutes sirolimus over a 90-day period using a biodegradable polymer microreservoir technology. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we compared an SEB-based strategy with provisional DES with one of systematic DES for de novo lesions in coronary arteries between 2 and 5 mm in diameter. Subjects were randomized 1:1 before percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. It was tested for noninferiority at 1 year with the use of an absolute margin equal to 50% of the combined event rate at a significance level of 0.025. The primary analysis population included all randomized subjects with completed or attempted percutaneous revascularization, analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the per-protocol population. RESULTS: Between August 27, 2021, and July 29, 2024, 3323 participants were randomized and treated in 62 sites. Among 1661 participants in the SEB strategy group, bailout stenting was performed in 343 (20.7%). Target vessel failure occurred over 365 days in 88 (5.3%) and 73 (4.4%) participants in the SEB and the systematic DES strategy groups, respectively (risk difference, 0.91% [95% CI –0.55% to 2.38%]; 1-sided P =0.02 for noninferiority with a 2.44% noninferiority margin). Clinically driven target vessel revascularization occurred more frequently in the SEB strategy group (3.3% versus 2.1%; risk difference, 1.22% [95% CI, 0.11%–2.33%). Safety events, including lesion thrombosis, were low and similar in both groups. Although the results of the per-protocol population (3194 participants, 96%) did not confirm noninferiority (upper boundary of the 95% CI, 2.63; P =0.04), they were similar to the intention-to-treat results in both magnitude and direction. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, in the primary intention-to-treat analysis population, a strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention with SEB and provisional DES was noninferior to the systematic use of DES for the primary end point of target vessel failure. The per-protocol population sensitivity analysis did not confirm noninferiority. Clinically driven target vessel revascularization occurred more frequently in the SEB strategy group. At 5 years, target vessel failure will be tested again for noninferiority and for superiority if noninferiority is achieved. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04859985.

Lipids, together with lipoprotein particles, are the cause of atherosclerosis, which is a pathology of the cardiovascular system. In addition, it affects inflammatory processes and affects the vessels and heart. In pharmaceutical answer to this, statins are considered a first-stage treatment method to block cholesterol synthesis. Many times, additional drugs are also used with this method to lower lipid concentrations in order to achieve certain values of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Recent advances in photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a new cancer treatment have gained the therapy much attention as a minimally invasive and highly selective method. Photodynamic therapy has been proven more effective than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy alone in numerous studies. Consequently, photodynamic therapy research has expanded in many fields of medicine due to its increased therapeutic effects and reduced side effects. Currently, PDT is the most commonly used therapy for treating age-related macular degeneration, as well as inflammatory diseases, and skin infections. The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy against a number of pathogens has also been demonstrated in various studies. Also, PDT has been used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis and hyperplasia of the arterial intima. This review evaluates the effectiveness and usefulness of photodynamic therapy in cardiovascular diseases. According to the analysis, photodynamic therapy is a promising approach for treating cardiovascular diseases and may lead to new clinical trials and management standards. Our review addresses the used therapeutic strategies and also describes new therapeutic strategies to reduce the cardiovascular burden that is induced by lipids.

The origins of photodynamic therapy (PDT) date back to 1904. Since then, the amount of research proving PDT and, consequently, its applicability to various disease states has steadily increased. Currently, PDT is mainly used in oncology to destroy cancer cells. It is being worked on for possible use in other medical fields as well, including cardiology. It can be used in the prevention of restenosis, often occurring after vascular surgical interventions, for destroying atherosclerotic plaques and as a new ablative method of ectopic centers in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this review is to summarize the knowledge to date regarding the therapeutic potential of using PDT for various pathological conditions in cardiology. The review also focuses on the current limitations associated with the use of PDT and identifies areas where more research is needed to develop better drug regimens. Materials and methods: The study analyzed 189 medical articles. The articles came from PubMed, Frontiers, Google Scholar, Science Direct and Web of Science databases. Through the excitation of light, a photosensitizer (PS) introduced into the body, the destruction of pathological cells occurs. PTD is widely used in oncology of the central nervous system (CNS). This process is made possible by the production of free oxygen radicals (ROS) and singlet oxygen, which generate oxidative stress that destroys sensitive cancer cells. In recent years, photosensitizers have also been discovered to have a strong affinity for macrophages that fill atherosclerotic plaques, making these compounds suitable for treating atherosclerosis. By inducing apoptosis of smooth muscle cells, inactivating basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-β) and inhibiting endothelial cell hyperplasia, PDT can be used to prevent restenosis after surgical proceduresPDT appears to be a minimally invasive and highly effective therapeutic method, especially when combined with other therapeutic methods. Unfortunately, the small number of animal model studies and human clinical trials greatly limit the applicability of PDT on a wider scale. Current limitations, such as the depth of penetration, delivery of photosensitizer particles to the direct site of the lesion or the appropriate choice of photosensitizer in relation to the nature of the pathology, unfortunately make it impossible to replace current therapeutic approaches.