Mar Tintoré

Dr. Mar Tintoré

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAlan J Thompson
Alan J Thompson
BBBrenda L Banwell
Brenda L Banwell
FBFrederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof
WCWilliam M Carroll
William M Carroll
TCTimothy Coetzee
Timothy Coetzee
JCJeffrey A Cohen
Jeffrey A Cohen

1 March 2016 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Massimo FilippiMassimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi
MRMaria A Rocca
Maria A Rocca
OCOlga Ciccarelli
Olga Ciccarelli
NSNicola De Stefano
Nicola De Stefano
NENikos Evangelou
Nikos Evangelou
FBFrederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof
In patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome, MRI can support and substitute clinical information in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by showing disease dissemination in space and time and by helping to exclude disorders that can mimic multiple sclerosis. MRI criteria were first included in the diagnostic work-up for multiple sclerosis in 2001, and since then several modifications to the criteria have been proposed in an attempt to simplify lesion-count models for showing disease dissemination in space, change the timing of MRI scanning to show dissemination in time, and increase the value of spinal cord imaging. Since the last update of these criteria, new data on the use of MRI to establish dissemination in space and time have become available, and MRI technology has improved. State-of-the-art MRI findings in these patients were discussed in a MAGNIMS workshop, the goal of which was to provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on proposed modifications to MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

13 May 2013 in Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHanne Flinstad Harbo
Hanne Flinstad Harbo
RGRalf Gold
Ralf Gold
Mar TintoréMar Tintoré
Mar Tintoré
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is universally found to be more prevalent in women than men. This has led to extensive studies of differences in the immune system or nervous system between women and men, which might be caused by the effects of gonadal hormones, genetic differences, and different environmental exposures and modern lifestyle in men and women. We review the effects of sex and gender from a genetic, immunological and clinical point of view. We discuss the effects of sex on the clinical expression of MS and responses to therapy, as well as issues concerning pregnancy.

21 April 2015 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mar TintoréMar Tintoré
Mar Tintoré
ÀRÀlex Rovira
Àlex Rovira
JRJordi Río
Jordi Río
SOSusana Otero-Romero
Susana Otero-Romero
GAGeorgina Arrambide
Georgina Arrambide
XMXavier Montalban
Xavier Montalban
Natural history studies have identified factors that predict evolution to multiple sclerosis or risk of disability accumulation over time. Although these studies are based on large multicentre cohorts with long follow-ups, they have limitations such as lack of standardized protocols, a retrospective data collection or lack of a systematic magnetic resonance imaging acquisition and analysis protocol, often resulting in failure to take magnetic resonance and oligoclonal bands into account as joint covariates in the prediction models. To overcome some of these limitations, the aim of our study was to identify and stratify baseline demographic, clinical, radiological and biological characteristics that might predict multiple sclerosis development and disability accumulation using a multivariate approach based on a large prospective cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes. From 1995 to 2013, 1058 patients with clinically isolated syndromes were included. We evaluated the influence of baseline prognostic factors on the risk for developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis, McDonald multiple sclerosis, and disability accumulation (Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0) based on univariate (hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals) and multivariate (adjusted hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals) Cox regression models. We ultimately included 1015 patients followed for a mean of 81 (standard deviation = 57) months. Female/male ratio was 2.1. Females exhibited a similar risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis and of disability accumulation compared to males. Each younger decade at onset was associated with a greater risk of conversion to multiple sclerosis and with a protective effect on disability. Patients with optic neuritis had a lower risk of clinically definite multiple sclerosis [hazard ratio 0.6 (0.5–0.8)] and disability progression [hazard ratio 0.5 (0.3–0.8)]; however, this protective effect remained marginal only for disability [adjusted hazard ratio 0.6 (0.4–1.0)] in adjusted models. The presence of oligoclonal bands increased the risk of clinically definite multiple sclerosis [adjusted hazard ratio 1.3 (1.0–1.8)] and of disability [adjusted hazard ratio 2.0 (1.2–3.6)] independently of other factors. The presence of 10 or more brain lesions on magnetic resonance increased the risk of clinically definite multiple sclerosis [adjusted hazard ratio 11.3 (6.7–19.3)] and disability [adjusted hazard ratio 2.9 (1.4–6.0)]. Disease-modifying treatment before the second attack reduced the risk of McDonald multiple sclerosis [adjusted hazard ratio 0.6 (0.4–0.9)] and disability accumulation [adjusted hazard ratio 0.5 (0.3–0.9)]. We conclude that the demographic and topographic characteristics are low-impact prognostic factors, the presence of oligoclonal bands is a medium-impact prognostic factor, and the number of lesions on brain magnetic resonance is a high-impact prognostic factor.

15 September 2015 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OGon behalf of the MAGNIMS study group
on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group
MWMike P. Wattjes
Mike P. Wattjes
ÀRÀlex Rovira
Àlex Rovira
DMDavid Miller
David Miller
TYTarek A. Yousry
Tarek A. Yousry
XMXavier Montalban
Xavier Montalban
The role of MRI in the assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) goes far beyond the diagnostic process. MRI techniques can be used as regular monitoring to help stage patients with MS and measure disease progression. MRI can also be used to measure lesion burden, thus providing useful information for the prediction of long-term disability. With the introduction of a new generation of immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of MS, MRI also makes an important contribution to the monitoring of treatment, and can be used to determine baseline tissue damage and detect subsequent repair. This use of MRI can help predict treatment response and assess the efficacy and safety of new therapies. In the second part of the MAGNIMS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS) network's guidelines on the use of MRI in MS, we focus on the implementation of this technique in prognostic and monitoring tasks. We present recommendations on how and when to use MRI for disease monitoring, and discuss some promising MRI approaches that may be introduced into clinical practice in the near future.

7 July 2015 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OGon behalf of the MAGNIMS study group
on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group
ÀRÀlex Rovira
Àlex Rovira
MWMike P. Wattjes
Mike P. Wattjes
Mar TintoréMar Tintoré
Mar Tintoré
CTCarmen Tur
Carmen Tur
XMXavier Montalban
Xavier Montalban
The clinical use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has advanced markedly over the past few years. Technical improvements and continuously emerging data from clinical trials and observational studies have contributed to the enhanced performance of this tool for achieving a prompt diagnosis in patients with MS. The aim of this article is to provide guidelines for the implementation of MRI of the brain and spinal cord in the diagnosis of patients who are suspected of having MS. These guidelines are based on an extensive review of the recent literature, as well as on the personal experience of the members of the MAGNIMS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS) network. We address the indications, timing, coverage, reporting and interpretation of MRI studies in patients with suspected MS. Our recommendations are intended to help radiologists and neurologists standardize and optimize the use of MRI in clinical practice for the diagnosis of MS.