The majority of historical buildings and structures in Oman were built using unreinforced stone masonry. These structures have deteriorated due to ageing of materials, environmental degradation, and lack of maintenance. This research investigates the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of local building materials and the results of an experimental study on the out-of-plane bending effectiveness of an innovative strengthening method applied to existing masonry walls. The technique consists of the application of a basalt textile-reinforced sarooj mortar (TRM) on one face of the walls. Bending tests of masonry wall samples (1000 mm width, 2000 mm height, and 350 mm depth) were carried out on one unreinforced specimen and three different cases of reinforced specimens. The performance of unreinforced and reinforced specimens was analyzed and compared. The strengthened specimens were able to resist moments of out-of-plane bending 2.5 to 3 times greater than those of unreinforced specimen (160–233% increase). Moreover, the strengthened walls were able to sustain higher deformations (deflections) than the unreinforced specimen ranging from 20 to 130%. The results showed that using TRM was effective for the out-of-plane strengthening of stone masonry using a local material (sarooj) that is compatible with existing stone masonry building materials.

Most historical buildings and structures in Oman were built using unreinforced stone masonry. These structures have deteriorated due to the aging of materials, environmental degradation, and lack of maintenance. This research investigates the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the local building materials. It also presents the findings of an experimental study on the in-plane shear effectiveness of a modern strengthening technique applied to existing stone masonry walls. The technique consists of the application of a textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) on one or two faces of the walls. Shear loading tests of full-scale masonry samples (1000 mm width, 1000 mm height, and 350 mm depth) were carried out on one unreinforced specimen and six different cases of reinforced specimens. The performances of the unreinforced and reinforced specimens were analyzed and compared. We found that strengthened specimens can resist in-plane shear stresses 1.5–2.1 times greater than those of the unreinforced specimen; moreover, they demonstrate ductility rather than sudden failure, due to the presence of fiberglass and basalt meshes, which restrict the opening of cracks.