Jae Ha Hwang

Dr. Jae Ha Hwang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Annals of Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJi Hong Lee
Ji Hong Lee
YCYoo-Duk Choi
Yoo-Duk Choi
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
MSMin-Ho Shin
Min-Ho Shin
SYSook Jung Yun
Sook Jung Yun
Lee JH, et al. Ann Dermatol. 2021 Jun;33(3):228-236. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2021.33.3.228

1 January 2022 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJun Ho Choi
Jun Ho Choi
SOSang Seong Oh
Sang Seong Oh
KKKwang Seog Kim
Kwang Seog Kim
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
SLSam Yong Lee
Sam Yong Lee
Choi JH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May;37(22):e181. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e181

20 December 2018 in Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKwang Seog Kim
Kwang Seog Kim
HLHan Gyeol Lee
Han Gyeol Lee
JSJun Ho Shin
Jun Ho Shin
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
SLSam Yong Lee
Sam Yong Lee
Nasal bone fractures occur frequently because the nasal bone is located at the forefront of the face. The goal of this study was to examine the cause, change in severity, change in incidence, and demographics of nasal bone fracture according to today's lifestyle. A total of 2,092 patients diagnosed as having nasal bone fractures at our department between 2002 and 2017 were included in this study. We retrospectively examined patients' medical records to extract information regarding age, sex, cause of injury, combined facial bone fractures, and related injuries such as skull base fracture, spinal cord injury, brain hemorrhage, and other bone fractures. Fracture severity was classified by nasal bone fracture type. No statistically significant difference was found in annual number of patients treated for nasal bone fracture. The proportion of patients who underwent closed reduction was significantly decreased over time for those with nasal bone fractures caused by traffic accidents. However, it was not significantly changed for those with nasal bone fractures due to other causes. The number of patients with combined facial bone fractures increased over time. Incidences of severe nasal bone fracture also increased over time. The study suggested that there is a decrease in the frequency and increase in the severity of nasal bone fracture due to traffic accident. Many protective devices prevent nasal bone fractures caused by a small amount of external force; however, these devices are not effective against higher amounts of external force. This study highlights the importance of preoperative thorough evaluation to manage patients with nasal bone fractures due to traffic accident.

20 October 2020 in Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHyeok Lee
Hyeok Lee
KKKwang Seog Kim
Kwang Seog Kim
JCJun Ho Choi
Jun Ho Choi
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
SLSam Yong Lee
Sam Yong Lee
Mandibular fractures are one of the most common types of facial fractures, the treatment of which can be delayed due to the severity of the trauma resulting in an increase of complications; thus, early evaluation of trauma severity at the time of visit is important. In South Korea, trauma patients are triaged and intensively treated in designated regional trauma centers. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between trauma severity and mandibular fracture patterns. A medical records review was performed on patients who visited the regional trauma center at our hospital for mandibular fracture between 2009 and 2018. Epidemiologic data and mandibular fracture patterns were analyzed and compared with the conventional facial injury severity scale (FISS). Among 73 patients, 51 were classified as non-severe trauma patients and 22 as severe trauma patients. A higher trauma severity was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.164; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.057–1.404) and lower risk was associated with fractures located in the angle (OR, 0.001; 95% CI, 0–0.022), condylar process (OR, 0.001; 95% CI, 0–0.28), and coronoid process (OR, 0.004; 95% CI, 0–0.985). The risk was lower when the injury mechanism was a pedestrian traffic accident (OR, 0.004; 95% CI, 0–0.417) or fall (OR, 0.004; 95% CI, 0–0.663) compared with an in-car traffic accident. Higher FISS (OR, 1.503; 95% CI, 1.155–2.049) was associated with a higher trauma severity. The proposed model was found to predict the trauma severity better than the model using FISS (p< 0.001). Age, location of mandibular fractures, and injury mechanism showed significant relationships with the trauma severity. Epidemiologic data and patterns of mandibular fractures could predict the trauma severity better than FISS.

1 January 2013 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSeung Leal Paek
Seung Leal Paek
YCYoung Seob Chung
Young Seob Chung
SPSun Ha Paek
Sun Ha Paek
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
CSChul-Ho Sohn
Chul-Ho Sohn
ZCZang-Hee Cho
Zang-Hee Cho
Paek SL, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(9):1362-1372. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1362

20 August 2020 in Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSam Yong Lee
Sam Yong Lee
SKSeung-hyun Kim
Seung-hyun Kim
JHJae Ha Hwang
Jae Ha Hwang
KKKwang Seog Kim
Kwang Seog Kim
The infraorbital nerve is a branch of the trigeminal nerve. Injury to the infraorbital nerve can be caused by trauma, including various facial fractures. Due to this nerve injury, patients complain of numbness and pain in the entire cheek, the ala of nose, and upper lip. In general, spontaneous sensory recovery is expected after decompressive surgery. If nerve transection is confirmed, however, neurorrhaphy is typically performed. Here, we present a case in which microsurgery was not performed in a patient with Sunderland grade V avulsion injury of the infraorbital nerve due to a facial bone fracture. Gradual nerve function recovery was confirmed to be possible with conservative treatment and rehabilitation alone. These findings suggest that the nerve function recovery can be expected with conservative treatment, even for severe nerve injury for which microsurgery cannot be considered.