Al–Mg–Zn alloys reinforced by T–Mg32(Al,Zn)49 phase had higher structure stability and strength than Al–Zn–Mg–(Cu) alloys reinforced by MgZn2 phase, but the reasons for these two kind of alloys was not well-known. To reveal the discrepancy between T phase and MgZn2 phase, the lattice parameters, cohesive energy, and electronic structure as well as the elastic properties were investigated based on density functional theory. Four types of T phase unit cell were employed according to symmetry of space group. The calculated lattice constants well-agreed with experimental data. Compared to MgZn2 phase, T phases obtained lower cohesive energy owing to their partial covalent bond, which may result in a higher structure stability. The elastic modulus E of T phase depended on the occupation of Al atom, and the effect of the occupation of Al atom on the structure and properties of T phase was also discussed.
High-performance Sc-containing aluminum alloys are limited in their industrial application due to the high cost of Sc elements. Er, Zr, and Y elements are candidates for replacing Sc elements. Combined with the first-principles thermodynamic calculation and the classical nucleation theory, the nucleation of L12-Al3M (M = Sc, Er, Y, Zr) nanophases in dilutealuminum alloys were investigated to reveal their structural stability. The calculated results showed that the critical radius and nucleation energy of the L12-Al3M phases were as follows: Al3Er > Al3Y > Al3Sc > Al3Zr. The Al3Zr phase was the easiest to nucleate in thermodynamics, while the nucleation of the Al3Y and Al3Er phases were relatively difficult in thermodynamics. Various structures of Al3(Y, Zr) phases with the radius r < 1 nm can coexist in Al-Y-Zr alloys. At a precipitate’s radius of 1–10 nanometers, the core–shelled Al3Zr(Y) phase illustrated the highest nucleation energy, while the separated structure Al3Zr/Al3Y obtained the lowest one, and had thermodynamic advantages in the nucleation process. Moreover, the core–shelled Al3Zr(Y) phase obtained a higher nucleation energy than Al3Zr(Sc) and Al3Zr(Er). Core–doubleshelled Al3Zr/Er(Y) obtained a lower nucleation energy than that of Al3Zr(Y) due to the negative ΔGchem of Al3Er and the negative Al3Er/Al3Y interfacial energy, and was preferentially precipitated in thermodynamics stability.
Atomic diffusion by the vacancy defect of L12-Al3M (M = Sc, Zr, Er, Y) was investigated based on a first-principles calculation. The point defect formation energies were firstly evaluated. Then, the migration energy for different diffusion paths was obtained by the climbing-image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method. The results showed that Al atomic and M atomic diffusions through nearest-neighbor jump (NNJ) mediated by Al vacancy (VAl) were, respectively, the preferred diffusion paths in Al3M phases under both Al-rich and M-rich conditions. The other mechanisms, such as six-jump cycle (6JC) and next-nearest-neighbor jump (NNNJ), were energetically inhibited. The order of activation barriers for NNJ(Al-VAl) was Al3Zr < Al3Y < Al3Er < Al3Sc. The Al3Sc phase had high stability with a high self-diffusion activation barrier, while the Al3Zr and Al3Y phases were relatively unstable with a low self-diffusion activation energy. Moreover, the atomic-diffusion behavior between the core and shell layers of L12-Al3M was also further investigated. Zr atoms were prone to diffusion into the Al3Y core layer, resulting in no stable core-shelled Al3(Y,Zr), which well agreed with experimental observation.