Vikram Gota

Dr. Vikram Gota


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 January 2010 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VGVikram Gota
Vikram Gota
GMGirish B. Maru
Girish B. Maru
TSTejal G. Soni
Tejal G. Soni
TGTejal R. Gandhi
Tejal R. Gandhi
NKNitin Kochar
Nitin Kochar
MAManish G. Agarwal
Manish G. Agarwal

18 May 2022 in Toxicology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGSaurabh Kumar Gupta
Saurabh Kumar Gupta
SJShraddha Jadhav
Shraddha Jadhav
DGDievya Gohil
Dievya Gohil
GPGirish Ch. Panigrahi
Girish Ch. Panigrahi
RKRajiv Kumar Kaushal
Rajiv Kumar Kaushal
VGVikram Gota
Vikram Gota
Withaferin-A (WA) is the principle component of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha). It has several biological activities including anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective and immune-modulatory properties. The acute and sub-acute toxicity of oral WA was investigated in mice. In the acute toxicity study, up to 2000 mg/kg of WA was well tolerated without any signs of toxicity or death. In the sub-acute toxicity study, mice were orally administered 10, 70 and 500 mg/kg of WA respectively, daily for 28 days. Upon physiological, serum chemistry, hematology and histopathogical examination, no features suggestive of drug-induced toxicity were observed at any dose levels, thereby confirming the No-Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) to be at least 500 mg/kg. Furthermore, the oral bioavailability of WA was evaluated using single intravenous and oral doses of 10 mg/kg and 70 mg/kg respectively using sparse sampling strategy. Bioanalysis was carried out using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The AUC of WA was found to be 3996.9 ± 557.6 ng/mL*h and 141.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL*h for the intravenous and oral routes of administration respectively. The oral bioavailability was determined to be 1.8%. To conclude, WA was found to be extremely safe even at high doses, with a low oral bioavailability.

21 June 2016 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VGVikram Gota
Vikram Gota
AKAshwin Karanam
Ashwin Karanam
SRSanhita Rath
Sanhita Rath
AYAkanksha Yadav
Akanksha Yadav
PTPrashant Tembhare
Prashant Tembhare
HMHari Menon
Hari Menon

11 January 2020 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHari Sankaran
Hari Sankaran
SSSoumika Sengupta
Soumika Sengupta
VPVaitashi Purohit
Vaitashi Purohit
AKAnand Kotagere
Anand Kotagere
NMNirmalya Roy Moulik
Nirmalya Roy Moulik
VGVikram Gota
Vikram Gota


26 July 2024 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKhushboo A. Gandhi
Khushboo A. Gandhi
ASAditi Shirsat
Aditi Shirsat
SHSharat Kumar Hj
Sharat Kumar Hj
ACAshish Chavan
Ashish Chavan
PDParnika Dicholkar
Parnika Dicholkar
VGVikram Gota
Vikram Gota
Purpose: Nivolumab is approved at various doses, including 3 mg/kg, 240 mg and 480 mg flat doses at various dosing intervals. The concept of low-dose immunotherapy is gaining traction in recent years. However, there is a need to better understand the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes at lower doses. Methods: Patients were either administered 40 mg flat dose or 3 mg/kg Q2W/Q3W, depending on affordability as per prevailing hospital practice. All patients were hospitalized on day 1 and pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 6.0, 24.0, 72.0 h and day 14 following administration of the first dose of nivolumab. Plasma nivolumab levels were measured by ELISA. Patients were followed up for response and toxicity. Results: Twenty five patients were included in the study. Fourteen received nivolumab at conventional dose (3 mg/kg), while 11 patients received low-dose (40 mg flat). The geometric means of dose normalized Cmax and AUC0-t were comparable between those who received conventional dose and low-dose of nivolumab (0.28 versus 0.23 µg/mL/mg and 0.0014 versus 0.0011 d/mL respectively). Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. ORR among patients who received conventional dose was 5/11 (45.5%) whereas it was 4/9 (44.4%) in the low-dose cohort. All 14 (100%) patients in conventional dosing group and 7/11 patients (63.64%) in low-dose group had treatment emergent adverse events. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed in 4/14 patients in conventional dose group and none in low-dose group. Conclusion: Low-dose nivolumab leads to lower exposure in patients as compared with conventional dose, but low-dose was better tolerated, while response rates were comparable to conventional dose.