The spatial mapping and prediction of groundwater quality (GWQ) is important for sustainable groundwater management, but several research gaps remain unexplored, including the inaccuracy of spatial interpolation, limited consideration of the geological environment and human activity effects, limitation to specific pollutants, and unsystematic indicator selection. This study utilized the entropy-weighted water quality index (EWQI), the LightGBM model, the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to address the above research gaps. The normalized importance (NI) shows that NO₃⁻ (0.208), Mg²⁺ (0.143), SO₄²⁻ (0.110), Cr⁶⁺ (0.109) and Na⁺ (0.095) should be prioritized as parameters for remediation, and the skewness EWQI distribution indicates that although most sampled locations have acceptable GWQ, a few areas suffer from severely poor GWQ. The PSR framework identifies 13 indicators from geological environments and human activities for the SMP of GWQ. Despite high AUROCs (0.9074, 0.8981, 0.8885, 0.9043) across four random training and testing sets, it was surprising that significant spatial uncertainty was observed, with Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) from 0.5365 to 0.8066. We addressed this issue by using the spatial-grid average probabilities of four maps. Additionally, population and nighttime light are key indicators, while net recharge, land use and cover (LULC), and the degree of urbanization have the lowest importance. SHAP analysis highlights both positive and negative impacts of human activities on GWQ, identifying point-source pollution as the main cause of the poor GWQ in the study area. Due to the limited research on this field, future studies should focus on six key aspects: multi-method GWQ assessment, quantitative relationships between indicators and GWQ, comparisons of various spatial mapping and prediction models, the application of the PSR framework for indicator selection, the development of methods to reduce spatial uncertainty, and the use of explainable machine learning techniques in groundwater management.

At present, landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) based on the characteristics of landslides in different areas is an effective prevention measure for landslide management. In Enshi County, China, the landslides are mainly triggered by high-intensity rainfall, which causes a large number of casualties and economic losses every year. In order to effectively control the landslide occurrence in Enshi County and mitigate the damages caused by the landslide. In this study, eight indicators were selected as assessment indicators for LSA in Enshi County. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model, information value (IV) model and analytic hierarchy process-information value (AHP-IV) model were, respectively, applied to assess the landslide distribution of landslides in the rainy season (RS) and non-rainy season (NRS). Based on the three models, the study area was classified into five levels of landslide susceptibility, including very high susceptibility, high susceptibility, medium susceptibility, low susceptibility, and very low susceptibility. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to verify the model accuracy. The results showed that the AHP-IV model (ROC = 0.7716) was more suitable in RS, and the IV model (ROC = 0.8237) was the most appropriate model in NRS. Finally, combined with the results of landslide susceptibility in RS and NRS, an integrated landslide susceptibility map was proposed, involving year-round high susceptibility, RS high susceptibility, NRS high susceptibility and year-round low susceptibility. The integrated landslide susceptibility results provide a more detailed division in terms of the different time periods in a year, which is beneficial for the government to efficiently allocate landslide management funds and propose effective landslide management strategies. Additionally, the focused arrangement of monitoring works in landslide-prone areas enable collect landslide information efficiently, which is helpful for the subsequent landslide preventive management.

The land use change (LUC) and urbanization caused by human activities have markedly increased the occurrence of landslides, presenting significant challenges in accurately predicting landslide susceptibility despite decades of model advancements. This study, focusing on the Li River Valley (LRV) within the Yongding District, China, employs two common models, namely an analytic hierarchy process–comprehensive index (AHP-CI) model and a logistic regression (LR) model to assess landslide susceptibility (LS). The AHP-CI model is empirically based, with the advantage of being constructible and applicable at various scales without a dataset, though it remains highly subjective. The LR model is a statistical model that requires a training set. The two models represent heuristic and statistical approaches, respectively, to assessing LS. Meanwhile, the basic geological and environmental conditions are considered in the AHP-CI model, while the LR model accounts for the conditions of LUC and urbanization. The results of the multicollinearity diagnostics reflect the rationality of the predisposing factor selection (1.131 < VIF < 4.441). The findings reveal that the AHP-CI model underperforms in LUC and urbanization conditions (AUROC = 0.645, 0.628, and 0.667 for different validation datasets). However, when all the time-varying human activity predisposing factors are considered, the LR model (AUROC = 0.852) performs significantly better under the conditions of solely considering 2010 (AUROC = 0.744) and 2020 (AUROC = 0.810). The CA–Markov model was employed to project the future land use for the short-term (2025), mid-term (2030), and long-term (2040) planning periods. Based on these projections, maps of future LS were created. Importantly, this paper discussed the relationships between landslide management and regional sustainable development under the framework of the UN SDGs, which are relevant to Goal 1, Goal 11, Goal 13, and Goal 15. Finally, this study highlights the importance of integrating strategic land planning, reforestation efforts, and a thorough assessment of human impact predisposing factors with SDG-aligned LS predictions, advocating for a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder strategy to promote sustainable landslide mitigation.