Background: The impact of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on the performance and career of professional soccer players has not been extensively investigated. Purpose: To evaluate in professional European soccer players (1) the ACL injury incidence, (2) the return-to-play (RTP) rate and time after ACLR, (3) career survival and athlete performance in the first 3 postoperative seasons after RTP, (4) factors likely related to different outcomes after ACLR, and (5) any related differences between the top 8 European soccer leagues. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Included were professional soccer players in the top 8 European Soccer leagues (Serie A [Italy], Premier League [England], Ligue 1 [France], LaLiga [Spain], Bundesliga [Germany], Jupiler Pro League [Belgium], Liga NOS [Portugal], and Premier Liga [Russia]) who sustained an ACL injury during seasons 2014 to 2015, 2015 to 2016, and 2016 to 2017. Data were retrieved from publicly available online sources. Outcomes were evaluated based on player age (30 years), position (goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, and forward), affected side (dominant vs nondominant), and league. Results: Overall, 195 players sustained an ACL injury, for a mean annual ACL injury incidence of 1.42%. The RTP rate was 95%, with a mean RTP time of 248 ± 136 days. Within the third postoperative season, 66 players (36%) competed in a lower level national league, and 25 (13.6%) ended their careers; a significant reduction in the mean minutes played per season was found in all 3 postoperative seasons. Player age correlated significantly with reduction in performance or recovery from an ACL injury. No significant correlation was found between postoperative player performance and affected side, position, league, or time to RTP. Conclusion: A substantial ACL injury incidence was found in top European elite soccer players; however, a high RTP rate in a reasonable time was seen after ACLR. Nevertheless, professional soccer players experienced a short-term decline in their performance.

Introduction: Medial discoid meniscus is estimated to occur in 0.06% to 0.3% of the population, being bilateral medial discoid menisci. The current tendency to be very conservative in treating meniscal lesions should be applied to the discoid meniscus, too, so that the cauterization and suture of a torn discoid meniscus are gaining support. Case presentation: We present the case of a 13-years-old Caucasian male competitive football player with a diagnosis of bilateral medial discoid menisci. Arthroscopy of the left symptomatic knee found an incomplete medial discoid meniscus, with an atypical hypertrophic posterior horn and root with a lack of rear tibial attachments. Saucerization to obtain a standard semilunar shape plus outside-in sutures to repair the horizontal tear and stabilize the meniscus’s peripheral rim was performed. The asymptomatic right knee was treated conservatively. After seven months, complete resolution of the symptoms in the left knee and no worsening of symptoms in the right knee was reported. Conclusion: Bilateral discoid medial meniscus is a rare abnormality involving active young patients. The conservative treatment is the preferred option in asymptomatic patients. Sauceriziation and eventual repair represent the suggested surgical treatment in symptomatic cases.

Knee PJIs represent one of the most important complications after joint replacement surgery. If the prerequisites for implant retention do not subsist, the surgical treatment of these conditions is performed using one-stage and two-stage revision techniques. In this study, an implemented two-stage revision technique was performed, adopting antibiotic calcium sulfate beads and tumor-like debridement guided by methylene blue, such as described for the DAPRI technique. The aim of the present study is to compare the implemented two-stage revision technique with the standard technique in order to assess its effectiveness. Methods. Twenty patients affected by knee PJIs were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent an implemented two-stage revision technique (Group A). Data collected and clinical results were compared with a matched control group treated with a standard two-stage technique (Group B). For each patient, the time of the reimplantation and length of antibiotic systemic therapy were recorded. Each patient underwent routine laboratory tests, including inflammatory markers. Results. In Group A and in Group B, inflammatory markers normalized at 6.5 ± 1.1. weeks and 11.1 ± 2.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05). Also, the difference in length of antibiotic therapy and time to reimplantation were significantly shorter in Group A (p < 0.05). No recurrence of infection was found in Group A at the last follow-up. Discussion. The implemented two-stage revision technique demonstrated a faster normalization of inflammatory markers, as well as a decrease in reimplantation time and duration of antibiotic therapy, compared to the traditional technique. The use of calcium sulfate antibiotic beads and tumor-like debridement seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. Conclusion. The implemented two-stage revision technique seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. This leads to a more rapid and less stressful course for the patient, as well as a reduction in health care costs.

Obtaining a proper position for total hip arthroplasty components is a crucial aspect of implant performance and consequently of patient outcomes. Restoring the original hip center and maintaining the limb length are key factors in reaching the optimal implant positioning. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and safety of a computed dynamic analysis system that, through patient-specific guides, tries to improve implant positioning and functional orientation according to patients’ spinopelvic mobility and anatomy. A total of 100 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. All patients received an Optimized Positioning System dynamic hip preoperative planning schedule. A CT scan protocol follow-up analysis was performed 6 months after surgery. The mean deviations from the planned acetabular inclination and anteversion were 4.3° and 3.8°, respectively. In total, 98% of cases were within ± 10° of the Lewinnek safe zone, both for inclination and anteversion. The height of osteotomy deviated, on average, 1.6 mm. In total, 100% of cases were included within 4 mm of osteotomy. Patient-specific and laser-guided instrumentation was found to be safe and accurately reproduced dynamic planning in terms of the component orientation, osteotomy level, leg length and offset.