Monireh Faramarzi

Dr. Monireh Faramarzi

Assistant Professor, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan, Drive Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 October 2009 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKarim Abbaspour
Karim Abbaspour
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
SGSamaneh Seyed Ghasemi
Samaneh Seyed Ghasemi
HYHong Yang
Hong Yang

27 November 2008 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
KAKarim C. Abbaspour
Karim C. Abbaspour
RSRainer Schulin
Rainer Schulin
HYHong Yang
Hong Yang

1 February 2013 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
KAKarim C. Abbaspour
Karim C. Abbaspour
SVSaeid Ashraf Vaghefi
Saeid Ashraf Vaghefi
MFMohammad Reza Farzaneh
Mohammad Reza Farzaneh
AZAlexander J.B. Zehnder
Alexander J.B. Zehnder
HYHong Yang
Hong Yang

10 January 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDavid Chunn
David Chunn
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
BSBrian Smerdon
Brian Smerdon
DADaniel Alessi
Daniel Alessi
It has become imperative that surface and groundwater resources be managed as a holistic system. This study applies a coupled groundwater–surface water (GW–SW) model, SWAT–MODFLOW, to study the hydrogeological conditions and the potential impacts of climate change and groundwater withdrawals on GW–SW interactions at a regional scale in western Canada. Model components were calibrated and validated using monthly river flow and hydraulic head data for the 1986–2007 period. Downscaled climate projections from five General Circulation Models (GCMs), under the RCP 8.5, for the 2010–2034 period, were incorporated into the calibrated model. The results demonstrated that GW–SW exchange in the upstream areas had the most pronounced fluctuation between the wet and dry months under historical conditions. While climate change was revealed to have a negligible impact in the GW–SW exchange pattern for the 2010–2034 period, the addition of pumping 21 wells at a rate of 4680 m3/d per well to support hypothetical high-volume water use by the energy sector significantly impacted the exchange pattern. The results showed that the total average discharge into the rivers was only slightly reduced from 1294 m3/d to 1174 m3/d; however, localized flowrate differences varied from under 5 m3/d to over 3000 m3/d in 320 of the 405 river cells. The combined potential impact is that intensive groundwater use may have more immediate effects on river flow than those of climate change, which has important implications for water resources management and for energy supply in the future.

1 November 2010 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
HYHong Yang
Hong Yang
RSRainer Schulin
Rainer Schulin
KAKarim C. Abbaspour
Karim C. Abbaspour

20 November 2015 in Hydrological Sciences Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMahmood Azari
Mahmood Azari
HMHamid Reza Moradi
Hamid Reza Moradi
BSBahram Saghafian
Bahram Saghafian
Monireh FaramarziMonireh Faramarzi
Monireh Faramarzi
Climate change will accelerate the hydrological cycle, altering rainfall, and the magnitude and timing of runoff. The purpose of this paper is to assess the impacts of climate change on streamflow and sediment yield from the Gorganroud river basin in the North of Iran. To study the effects of climatic variations, the SWAT model was implemented to simulate the hydrological regime and the SUFI-2 algorithm was used for parameter optimization. The climate change scenarios were constructed using the outcomes of three general circulation models for three emission scenarios. The study results for 2040–2069 showed an increase in annual streamflow of 5.8%, 2.8% and 9.5% and an increase in sediment yield of 47.7%, 44.5% and 35.9% for the A1F1, A2 and B1 emission scenarios, respectively. This implies that the impact of climate change on sediment yield is greater than on streamflow. Monthly variations show that the increase in discharge and sediment yield is more pronounced in wet seasons and the decrease is more pronounced in summer (July–September). The results highlighted the strong impact of climate change and reflected the importance of incorporating such analysis into adaptive management.