Tea Tree Oil (TTO) is an essential oil obtained from the distillation of Melaleuca alternifolia leaves and branches. Due to its beneficial properties, TTO is widely used as an active ingredient in antimicrobial preparations for topical use or in cosmetic products and contains about 100 different compounds, with terpinen-4-ol, γ-terpinene and 1,8-cineole (or eucalyptol) being the molecules most responsible for its biological activities. In this work, the antimicrobial activity of whole TTO and these three major components was evaluated in vitro against fungi, bacteria and viruses. Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out on a bacterial membrane model and a Coxsackievirus B4 viral capsid, to propose an atomistic explanation of their mechanism of action. The obtained results indicate that the strong antimicrobial activity of TTO is attributable to the induction of an altered membrane functionality, mediated by the incorporation of its components within the lipid bilayer, and to a possible ability of the compounds to bind and alter the structural properties of the viral capsid.

Viral spillover represents the transmission of pathogen viruses from one species to another that can give rise to an outbreak. It is a critical concept that has gained increasing attention, particularly after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the term is often used inaccurately to describe events that do not meet the true definition of spillover. This review aims to clarify the proper use of the term and provides a detailed analysis of the mechanisms driving zoonotic spillover, with a focus on the genetic and environmental factors that enable viruses to adapt to new hosts. Key topics include viral genetic variability in reservoir species, biological barriers to cross-species transmission, and the factors that influence viral adaptation and spread in novel hosts. The review also examines the role of evolutionary processes such as mutation and epistasis, alongside ecological conditions that facilitate the emergence of new pathogens. Ultimately, it underscores the need for more accurate predictive models and improved surveillance to better anticipate and mitigate future spillover events.

Persistence is a strategy used by many viruses to evade eradication by the immune system, ensuring their permanence and transmission within the host and optimizing viral fitness. During persistence, viruses can trigger various phenomena, including target organ damage, mainly due to an inflammatory state induced by infection, as well as cell proliferation and/or immortalization. In addition to immune evasion and chronic inflammation, factors contributing to viral persistence include low-level viral replication, the accumulation of viral mutants, and, most importantly, maintenance of the viral genome and reliance on viral oncoprotein production. This review focuses on the process of genome integration, which may occur at different stages of infection (e.g., HBV), during the chronic phase of infection (e.g., HPV, EBV), or as an essential part of the viral life cycle, as seen in retroviruses (HIV, HTLV-1). It also explores the close relationship between integration, persistence, and oncogenesis. Several models have been proposed to describe the genome integration process, including non-homologous recombination, looping, and microhomology models. Integration can occur either randomly or at specific genomic sites, often leading to genome destabilization. In some cases, integration results in the loss of genomic regions or impairs the regulation of oncogene and/or oncosuppressor expression, contributing to tumor development.

(1) Background: SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) is a promising therapeutic target to fight COVID-19, and many RdRp inhibitors nucleotide/nucleoside analogs, such as remdesivir, have been identified or are in clinical studies. However, the appearance of resistant mutations could reduce their efficacy. In the present work, we structurally evaluated the impact of RdRp mutations found at baseline in 39 patients treated with remdesivir and associated with a different degree of antiviral response in vivo. (2) Methods: A refined bioinformatics approach was applied to assign SARS-CoV-2 clade and lineage, and to define RdRp mutational profiles. In line with such a method, the same mutations were built and analyzed by combining docking and thermodynamics evaluations with both molecular dynamics and representative pharmacophore models. (3) Results: Clinical studies revealed that patients bearing the most prevalent triple mutant P323L+671S+M899I, which was present in 41% of patients, or the more complex mutational profile P323L+G671S+L838I+D738Y+K91E, which was found with a prevalence of 2.6%, showed a delayed reduced response to remdesivir, as confirmed by the increase in SARS-CoV-2 viral load and by a reduced theoretical binding affinity versus RdRp (ΔGbind_WT = −122.70 kcal/mol; ΔGbind_{P323L+671S+M899I} = −84.78 kcal/mol; ΔGbind_{P323L+G671S+L838I+D738Y+K91E} = −96.74 kcal/mol). Combined computational approaches helped to rationalize such clinical observations, offering a mechanistic understanding of the allosteric effects of mutants on the global motions of the viral RNA synthesis machine and in the changes of the interactions patterns of remdesivir during its binding.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and is mostly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. HBV can induce HCC by an indirect mechanism of continuous necro-inflammation, contributing to hepatocyte damage and promoting cancer, as well as by viral intrinsic factors. Among them, the major contributors to the development of HBV-related HCC are represented by (i) HBV DNA integration in genes modulating cell proliferation, (ii) HBV pro-oncogenic proteins, such as HBx and HBs, and (iii) the accumulation of viral mutations, enhancing the tumorigenic features of HBV proteins. The currently available antiviral treatments, based on the usage of Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs), substantially control HBV replication. However, even a successful NUC treatment does not completely abrogate HCC risk, since it rarely allows achievement of an HBV functional cure, the therapeutic end-point associated with HBsAg loss and more favorable liver outcomes. To date, novel therapeutic strategies based on innovative direct antivirals (nucleic acid polymers, small interfering RNAs, antisense oligonucleotides, covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) inhibitors, and capsid assembly modulators) and immune-therapeutics (therapeutic vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors, and Toll-like receptor agonists) are under evaluation in clinical trials. These approaches are showing promising data in terms of an HBV functional cure, thus representing novel strategies that could be beneficial for reducing the burden of HBV-related HCC. Lastly, further efforts in drug development are necessary to identify new compounds that could achieve a sterilizing HBV cure, implying the complete elimination of cccDNA and integrated HBV DNA, the only end-point that completely eradicates HBV and its related oncogenic risk.