Newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants may escape monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antiviral drugs. By using live virus assays, we assessed the ex vivo inhibition of the B.1 wild-type (WT), delta and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 lineages by post-infusion sera from 40 individuals treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab (BAM/ETE), casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), and sotrovimab (SOT) as well as the activity of remdesivir, nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir. mAbs and drug activity were defined as the serum dilution (ID₅₀) and drug concentration (IC₅₀), respectively, showing 50% protection of virus-induced cytopathic effect. All pre-infusion sera were negative for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity. BAM/ETE, CAS/IMD, and SOT showed activity against the WT (ID₅₀ 6295 (4355–8075) for BAM/ETE; 18,214 (16,248–21,365) for CAS/IMD; and 456 (265–592) for SOT) and the delta (14,780 (ID₅₀ 10,905–21,020) for BAM/ETE; 63,937 (47,211–79,971) for CAS/IMD; and 1103 (843–1334) for SOT). Notably, only SOT was active against BA.1 (ID₅₀ 200 (37–233)), whereas BA.2 was neutralized by CAS/IMD (ID₅₀ 174 (134–209) ID₅₀) and SOT (ID₅₀ 20 (9–31) ID₅₀), but not by BAM/ETE. No significant inter-variant IC₅₀ differences were observed for molnupiravir (1.5 ± 0.1/1.5 ± 0.7/1.0 ± 0.5/0.8 ± 0.01 μM for WT/delta/BA.1/BA.2, respectively), nirmatrelvir (0.05 ± 0.02/0.06 ± 0.01/0.04 ± 0.02/0.04 ± 0.01 μM) or remdesivir (0.08 ± 0.04/0.11 ± 0.08/0.05 ± 0.04/0.08 ± 0.01 μM). Continued evolution of SARS-CoV-2 requires updating the mAbs arsenal, although antivirals have so far remained unaffected.

Current therapy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are based on the use of Remdesivir 1, Molnupiravir 2, and the recently identified Nirmatrelvir 3. Unfortunately, these three drugs showed some limitations regarding potency and possible drug–drug interactions. A series of derivatives coming from a decoration approach of the privileged scaffold s-triazines were synthesized and evaluated against SAR-CoV-2. One derivative emerged as the hit of the series for its micromolar antiviral activity and low cytotoxicity. Mode of action and pharmacokinetic in vitro preliminary studies further confirm the role as candidates for a future optimization campaign of the most active derivative identified with this work.

Facile procedures exploiting three-component reactions were developed to regioselectively obtain 2-amino-7-methyl-5-phenyl- and 2-amino-5-methyl-7-phenyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine analogues bearing a C-6 electron withdrawing group.

Combination antiviral therapy may be helpful in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, no clinical trial data are available, and combined use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) has been reported only anecdotally. To assess the cooperative effects of dual drug combinations in vitro, we used a VERO E6 cell-based in vitro system with the ancestral B.1 or the highly divergent BQ.1.1 virus to test pairwise combinations of the licensed DAA, including nirmatrelvir (NRM), remdesivir (RDV) and the active metabolite of molnupiravir (EIDD-1931) as well the combination of RDV with four licensed mAbs (sotrovimab, bebtelovimab, cilgavimab, tixagevimab; tested only with the susceptible B.1 virus). According to SynergyFinder 3.0 summary and weighted scores, all the combinations had an additive effect. Within DAA/DAA combinations, paired scores with the B.1 and BQ.1.1 variants were comparable. In the post hoc analysis weighting synergy by concentrations, several cases of highly synergistic scores were detected at specific drug concentrations, both for DAA/DAA and for RDV/mAb combinations. This was supported by in vitro confirmation experiments showing a more than a linear shift of a drug-effective concentration (IC₅₀) at increasing concentrations of the companion drug, although the effect was prominent with DAA/DAA combinations and minimal or null with RDV/mAb combinations. These results support the cooperative effects of dual drug combinations in vitro, which should be further investigated in animal models before introduction into the clinic.

Doravirine and islatravir have shown promising activity against multidrug resistant HIV-1. In this study we aimed to evaluate the in vitro susceptibility to doravirine and islatravir as well as their combinatorial activity in a panel of 38 recombinant viruses harboring multiple NRTI and NNRTI mutations. One additional recombinant virus had the M184V mutation alone. According to the IC₅₀ fold-change (FC) values calculated with respect to the NL4-3 wild-type strain, full susceptibility to doravirine was detected in 15/39 (38.5 %) samples, while high-level resistance was mainly associated with specific doravirine resistance mutations. Decreased susceptibility to islatravir was associated with the presence of the M184V/I mutation and increasing numbers of TAMs and NRTI resistance mutations. According to ZIP model of the SynergyFinder Plus tool, the combination of doravirine and islatravir showed additive activity in 37/40 (92.5 %) viruses (including the NL4-3 strain), while synergy and antagonism in one and two cases, respectively. The combination sensitivity score calculated by SynergyFinder Plus indicated a cooperative effect between doravirine and islatravir higher than that observed for the reference NL4-3 strain in 22 (56 %) recombinant viruses. The Multi-dimensional Synergy of Combinations (MuSyC) tool predicted synergy and antagonism in 25 (62.5 %, including NL4-3 virus) and 15 (37.5 %) cases, respectively. MuSyC scores showed a negative correlation with doravirine FC values, number of NRTI mutations and presence of M184V/I, but not with islatravir FC values. Doravirine and islatravir may cooperatively inhibit NRTI and NNRTI resistant viruses despite complex mutational profiles, however the accumulation of resistance mutations may reduce the combinatorial activity.