Chunde Li

Dr. Chunde Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2016 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFu Zhao
Fu Zhao
HOHiroko Ohgaki
Hiroko Ohgaki
LXLei Xu
Lei Xu
FGFelice Giangaspero
Felice Giangaspero
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li
PLPinan Liu
Pinan Liu
Recent transcriptomic approaches have demonstrated that there are at least 4 distinct subgroups in medulloblastoma (MB); however, survival studies of molecular subgroups in adult MB have been inconclusive because of small sample sizes. The aim of this study is to investigate the molecular subgroups in adult MB and identify their clinical and prognostic implications in a large, single-institution cohort. We determined gene expression profiles for 13 primary adult MBs. Bioinformatics tools were used to establish distinct molecular subgroups based on the most informative genes in the dataset. Immunohistochemistry with subgroup-specific antibodies was then used for validation within an independent cohort of 201 formalin-fixed MB tumors, in conjunction with a systematic analysis of clinical and histological characteristics. Three distinct molecular variants of adult MB were identified: the SHH, WNT, and group 4 subgroups. Validation of these subgroups in the 201-tumor cohort by immunohistochemistry identified significant differences in subgroup-specific demographics, histology, and metastatic status. The SHH subgroup accounted for the majority of the tumors (62%), followed by the group 4 subgroup (28%) and the WNT subgroup (10%). Group 4 tumors had significantly worse progression-free and overall survival compared with tumors of the other molecular subtypes. We have identified 3 subgroups of adult MB, characterized by distinct expression profiles, clinical features, pathological features, and prognosis. Clinical variables incorporated with molecular subgroup are more significantly informative for predicting adult patient outcome.

1 August 2017 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTao Jiang
Tao Jiang
JWJunmei Wang
Junmei Wang
JDJiang Du
Jiang Du
SLShiqi Luo
Shiqi Luo
RLRaynald Liu
Raynald Liu
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li

29 August 2013 in Child's Nervous System
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li
LYLuxin Yin
Luxin Yin
Tao JiangTao Jiang
Tao Jiang
ZMZhenyu Ma
Zhenyu Ma
GJGe Jia
Ge Jia

6 February 2019 in Child's Nervous System
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHeng Zhang
Heng Zhang
ZLZhiyi Liao
Zhiyi Liao
XHXiaolei Hao
Xiaolei Hao
ZHZhe Han
Zhe Han
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li
YTYongji Tian
Yongji Tian

1 November 2017 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TJTao Jiang
Tao Jiang
JDJiang Du
Jiang Du
LRLiu Raynald
Liu Raynald
JWJunmei Wang
Junmei Wang
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li

12 May 2017 in Frontiers in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Tao JiangTao Jiang
Tao Jiang
YZYuqi Zhang
Yuqi Zhang
JWJunmei Wang
Junmei Wang
JDJiang Du
Jiang Du
RARaynald
Raynald
CLChunde Li
Chunde Li
Background: Medulloblastoma has been classified into four core subgroups according to the transcriptional profile in recent years. However, some disagreement among researchers remains regarding the prognoses and most effective treatments of the different subgroups with different age distributions. Objective: To analyze medulloblastoma prognosis in children population based on four molecular subgroups classification. Methods: From January 2011 to January 2013, 84 consecutive medulloblastoma patients aged underwent tumor removal at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. A total of 55 patients who ranged in age from 4-18 years underwent detailed follow-up. Molecular subgrouping was performed using RT-PCR. Results: The two-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the entire cohort were 76.2±5.8% and 81.8±5.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the Group 4 patients had a better survival (two-year OS, 90.6±5.2%) than the SHH subgroup (P=0.002) and Group 3 patients (P=0.008). Only 2 of the 23 nonmetastasized Group 4 patients relapsed, and chemotherapy did significantly affect these patients (PFS, P=0.685). One out of five WNT patients had tumor relapse and died at last. LC/A histology and chemotherapy were independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In our study, the nonmetastasized Group 4 patients had an excellent prognosis. The SHH subgroup and Group 3 patients had worst prognoses. LC/A histology had a dismal prognosis in our cohorts which warrants intensive treatment.