David A Prieto-Torres

Dr. David A Prieto-Torres

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 November 2015 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
ANAdolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza
Adolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza
DSDiego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
Diego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto

23 March 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAH. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
H. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
IGIgnacio Gómez-Lora
Ignacio Gómez-Lora
Diego J. LizcanoDiego J. Lizcano
Diego J. Lizcano
In Ecuador, Tapirus pinchaque is considered to be critically endangered. Although the species has been registered in several localities, its geographic distribution remains unclear, and the effects of climate change and current land uses on this species are largely unknown. We modeled the ecological niche of T. pinchaque using MaxEnt, in order to assess its potential adaptation to present and future climate change scenarios. We evaluated the effects of habitat loss due by current land use, the ecosystem availability and importance of Ecuadorian System of Protected Areas into the models. The model of environmental suitability estimated an extent of occurrence for species of 21,729 km2 in all of Ecuador, mainly occurring along the corridor of the eastern Ecuadorian Andes. A total of 10 Andean ecosystems encompassed ~98% of the area defined by the model, with herbaceous paramo, northeastern Andean montane evergreen forest and northeastern Andes upper montane evergreen forest being the most representative. When considering the effect of habitat loss, a significant reduction in model area (~17%) occurred, and the effect of climate change represented a net reduction up to 37.86%. However, the synergistic effect of both climate change and habitat loss, given current land use practices, could represent a greater risk in the short-term, leading to a net reduction of 19.90 to 44.65% in T. pinchaque’s potential distribution. Even under such a scenarios, several Protected Areas harbor a portion (~36 to 48%) of the potential distribution defined by the models. However, the central and southern populations are highly threatened by habitat loss and climate change. Based on these results and due to the restricted home range of T. pinchaque, its preference for upland forests and paramos, and its small estimated population size in the Andes, we suggest to maintaining its current status as Critically Endangered in Ecuador.

1 December 2018 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
JNJavier Nori
Javier Nori
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto

1 January 2020 in Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
ALAndres Lira-Noriega
Andres Lira-Noriega
ANAdolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza
Adolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza

11 December 2018 in Cladistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto
EBElisa Bonaccorso
Elisa Bonaccorso
DSDiego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
Diego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
ANAdolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza
Adolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza

23 April 2019 in Ardeola
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
OROctavio R. Rojas-Soto
Octavio R. Rojas-Soto
DSDiego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
Diego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
EBElisa Bonaccorso
Elisa Bonaccorso
ANAdolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza
Adolfo G. Navarro-Sigüenza
Neotropical seasonally dry forests (NSDF) are widely distributed across Latin America and the Caribbean. They possess important levels of species richness and endemism but few studies have assessed the diversity patterns and ecological relationships between the entire avifauna of these threatened forests. Thus, in order to analyse the macro-ecological patterns and the community structure of NSDF avifaunas, we generated species distribution models describing the current geographical distribution of 1,298 bird species inhabiting NSDF. We assessed species richness gradients in terms of distance from the Equator using both linear and polynomial regressions. Then, based on a matrix composed of the presence or absence of species in 563 quadrants, we performed cluster analyses (considering the Simpson dissimilarity index [βSIM] as a distance measure) to identify the main NSDF regions and describe the avifaunal affinities among them. For the identified groups, we estimated the dissimilarity values, using both an ANOSIM test and the βSIM index. Overall, we observed the lack of an equatorial peak for species diversity of NSDF avifauna in the latitudinal gradient and identified 12 avifaunistic groups. The βSIM index among the NSDF avifaunal groups ranged from 0.05-0.73, showing statistically significant differences (R = 0.894, p = 0.001) in species composition among them. Species shared between two or three NSDF groups comprised a higher proportion (∼38%) than those exclusive to each group (∼23%). Only 35 species were shared between the 12 groups. This information supports a separation of the NSDF avifauna into two major groups (northern and southern), as well as the idea of connections during recent geological time among the NSDF in southeastern South America (the so-called Pleistocene Arc Hypothesis). We provide a scientific framework to contextualise the importance of each NSDF nuclei in terms of their avifauna, supplying an ecological basis for future conservation decisions in order to protect their diversity. —Prieto-Torres, D.A., Rojas-Soto, O.R., Santiago-Alarcón, D., Bonaccorso, E. & Navarro-Sigüenza, A.G. (2019). Diversity, endemism, species turnover and relationships among avifauna of neotropical seasonally dry forests. Ardeola, 66: 257-277.