Octavio Rojas-Soto

Dr. Octavio Rojas-Soto


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 November 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAH. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
H. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto
JVJorge H Valencia
Jorge H Valencia
AMAlejandro Espinosa de los Monteros
Alejandro Espinosa de los Monteros
JMJuan J Morrone
Juan J Morrone
DCDavid C Cannatella
David C Cannatella
Pluralistic approaches to taxonomy facilitate a more complete appraisal of biodiversity, especially the diversification of cryptic species. Although species delimitation has traditionally been based primarily on morphological differences, the integration of new methods allows diverse lines of evidence to solve the problem. Robber frogs (Pristimantis) are exemplary, as many of the species show high morphological variation within populations, but few traits that are diagnostic of species. We used a combination of DNA sequences from three mitochondrial genes, morphometric data, and comparisons of ecological niche models (ENMs) to infer a phylogenetic hypothesis for the Pristimantis acuminatus complex. Molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed a close relationship between three new species—Pristimantis enigmaticus sp. nov., P. limoncochensis sp. nov. and P. omeviridis sp. nov.—originally confused with Pristimantis acuminatus. In combination with morphometric data and geographic distributions, several morphological characters such as degree of tympanum exposure, skin texture, ulnar/tarsal tubercles and sexual secondary characters (vocal slits and nuptial pads in males) were found to be useful for diagnosing species in the complex. Multivariate discriminant analyses provided a successful classification rate for 83–100% of specimens. Discriminant analysis of localities in environmental niche space showed a successful classification rate of 75–98%. Identity tests of ENMs rejected hypotheses of niche equivalency, although not strongly because the high values on niche overlap. Pristimantis acuminatus and P. enigmaticus sp. nov. are distributed along the lowlands of central–southern Ecuador and northern Peru, in contrast with P. limoncochensis sp. nov. and P. omeviridis sp. nov., which are found in northern Ecuador and southern Colombia, up to 1200 m in the upper Amazon Basin. The methods used herein provide an integrated framework for inventorying the greatly underestimated biodiversity in Amazonia.

18 November 2015 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDavid A Prieto-Torres
David A Prieto-Torres
ANAdolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza
Adolfo G. Navarro‐Sigüenza
DSDiego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
Diego SANTIAGO Santiago-Alarcon
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto

26 July 2012 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto
VSVictoria Sosa
Victoria Sosa
JOJuan Francisco Ornelas
Juan Francisco Ornelas

6 May 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAH. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
H. Mauricio Ortega Andrade
MBMarina Rodes Blanco
Marina Rodes Blanco
DCDiego F. Cisneros-Heredia
Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
NANereida Guerra Arévalo
Nereida Guerra Arévalo
KVKarima Gabriela López de Vargas-Machuca
Karima Gabriela López de Vargas-Machuca
MMMario H. Yánez Muñoz
Mario H. Yánez Muñoz
Ecuador is one of the most biodiverse countries in the world, but faces severe pressures and threats to its natural ecosystems. Numerous species have declined and require to be objectively evaluated and quantified, as a step towards the development of conservation strategies. Herein, we present an updated National Red List Assessment for amphibian species of Ecuador, with one of the most detailed and complete coverages for any Ecuadorian taxonomic group to date. Based on standardized methodologies that integrate taxonomic work, spatial analyses, and ecological niche modeling, we assessed the extinction risk and identified the main threats for all Ecuadorian native amphibians (635 species), using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Our evaluation reveals that 57% (363 species) are categorized as Threatened, 12% (78 species) as Near Threatened, 4% (26 species) as Data Deficient, and 27% (168 species) as Least Concern. Our assessment almost doubles the number of threatened species in comparison with previous evaluations. In addition to habitat loss, the expansion of the agricultural/cattle raising frontier and other anthropogenic threats (roads, human settlements, and mining/oil activities) amplify the incidence of other pressures as relevant predictors of ecological integrity. Potential synergic effects with climate change and emergent diseases (apparently responsible for the sudden declines), had particular importance amongst the threats sustained by Ecuadorian amphibians. Most threatened species are distributed in montane forests and paramo habitats of the Andes, with nearly 10% of them occurring outside the National System of Protected Areas of the Ecuadorian government. Based on our results, we recommend the following actions: (i) An increase of the National System of Protected Areas to include threatened species. (ii) Supporting the ex/in-situ conservation programs to protect species considered like Critically Endangered and Endangered. (iii) Focalizing research efforts towards the description of new species, as well as species currently categorized as Data Deficient (DD) that may turn out to be threatened. The implementation of the described actions is challenging, but urgent, given the current conservation crisis faced by amphibians.

29 April 2013 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGabriela Mendoza‐González
Gabriela Mendoza‐González
MMM. Luisa Martinez
M. Luisa Martinez
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto
GVGabriela Vázquez
Gabriela Vázquez
Juan B. Fernández-GallegoJuan B. Fernández-Gallego
Juan B. Fernández-Gallego

25 June 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYCarlos Yáñez-Arenas
Carlos Yáñez-Arenas
APA. Townsend Peterson
A. Townsend Peterson
PMPierre Mokondoko
Pierre Mokondoko
OROctavio Rojas-Soto
Octavio Rojas-Soto
EMEnrique Martínez-Meyer
Enrique Martínez-Meyer
Many authors have claimed that snakebite risk is associated with human population density, human activities, and snake behavior. Here we analyzed whether environmental suitability of vipers can be used as an indicator of snakebite risk. We tested several hypotheses to explain snakebite incidence, through the construction of models incorporating both environmental suitability and socioeconomic variables in Veracruz, Mexico. Ecological niche modeling (ENM) was used to estimate potential geographic and ecological distributions of nine viper species' in Veracruz. We calculated the distance to the species' niche centroid (DNC); this distance may be associated with a prediction of abundance. We found significant inverse relationships between snakebites and DNCs of common vipers (Crotalus simus and Bothrops asper), explaining respectively 15% and almost 35% of variation in snakebite incidence. Additionally, DNCs for these two vipers, in combination with marginalization of human populations, accounted for 76% of variation in incidence. Our results suggest that niche modeling and niche-centroid distance approaches can be used to mapping distributions of environmental suitability for venomous snakes; combining this ecological information with socioeconomic factors may help with inferring potential risk areas for snakebites, since hospital data are often biased (especially when incidences are low).