One of the most unique characteristics of cancer metabolism is activated aerobic glycolysis, which is called the “Warburg effect”, and is a hallmark of cancer. An acidic tumor microenvironment (TME) resulting from activated anaerobic glycolysis is associated with cancer progression, multi-drug resistance, and immune escape. Several in vitro and in vivo studies reported that neutralization of the acidic TME by alkalizing agents, such as bicarbonate, resulted in the suppression of cancer progression and a potential benefit for anti-cancer drug responses. In clinical settings, alkalizing effects were achieved not only by alkalizing agents, but also by a following a particular diet. An epidemiological study demonstrated that more fruits and vegetables and less meat and dairy products are associated with an increase in urine pH, which may reflect the alkalizing effect on the body. However, it remains unclear whether alkaline dietary intervention improves the effects of cancer treatment. Moreover, there are few clinical reports to date regarding cancer treatments being performed on patients together with alkalization therapy. In this review, we investigated whether alkalization therapy, which includes an alkaline diet and/or alkalizing agents, improves cancer treatment.

Current treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer offer limited benefits. In this study, we applied alkalization therapy, which was efficacious for other solid tumors at our clinic, to stage 4 pancreatic cancer patients, and investigated its effect on disease prognosis. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated at Karasuma Wada Clinic in Kyoto, Japan, between January 2011 and April 2022, were included in the study. All patients received alkalization therapy (a combination of an alkaline diet, bicarbonate, and citric acid administration), alongside standard chemotherapy. Urine samples were collected to assess urine pH as a marker of whole-body alkalization. In the 98 patients analyzed, the median overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis was 13.2 months. Patients with a mean urine pH of 7.5 or greater had a median OS of 29.9 months, compared with 15.2 months for those with a mean urine pH of 6.5 to 7.5, and 8.0 months for those with a mean urine pH of less than 6.5, which suggests a trend of a longer OS in patients with a higher urine pH (p = 0.0639). Alkalization therapy may offer a viable approach to extending the survival of stage 4 pancreatic cancer patients, who typically have an unfavorable prognosis.

Background: In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, is difficult to prevent recurrence even when remission is achieved. In addition, even with the advent of drugs that are effective for the treatment of HCC, a satisfactory extension of patient survival has not been achieved. To overcome this situation, we hypothesized that the combination of alkalization therapy with standard treatments will improve the prognosis of HCC. We here report the clinical results of HCC patients treated with alkalization therapy at our clinic.Patients and methods: Patients with HCC treated at Karasuma Wada Clinic (in Kyoto, Japan), from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) from both the time of diagnosis and the start of alkalization therapy for each patient was compared. The mean urine pH was also calculated as a surrogate marker of tumor microenvironment pH, and OS from the start of alkalization therapy was compared between patients with a mean urine pH of ≥ 7.0 and those with a mean urine pH of < 7.0.Results: Twenty-three men and six women were included in the analysis, with a mean age at diagnosis of 64.1 years (range: 37–87 years). Seven of the 29 patients had extrahepatic metastases. Patients were divided into two groups according to their mean urine pH after the initiation of alkalization therapy: 12 of the 29 patients had a mean urine pH of ≥ 7.0, and 17 had a mean urine pH of < 7.0. The median OS from diagnosis was 95.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 24.7-not reached), and from the start of alkalization therapy was 42.3 months (95% CI = 8.93-not reached). The median OS from the start of alkalization therapy in patients with a urine pH of ≥ 7.0 was not reached (n = 12, 95% CI = 3.0-not reached), which was significantly longer than that in patients with a pH of < 7.0 (15.4 months, n = 17, 95% CI = 5.8-not reached, p < 0.05).Conclusions: The addition of alkalization therapy to standard therapies may be associated with more favorable outcomes in HCC patients with increased urine pH after alkalization therapy.

This review article investigates the relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and cancer progression, emphasizing the metabolic shifts that promote tumor growth. Mitochondria are crucial for cellular energy production, but they also play a significant role in cancer progression by promoting glycolysis even under oxygen-rich conditions, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. This metabolic reprogramming enables cancer cells to maintain an alkaline internal pH and an acidic external environment, which are critical for their proliferation and survival in hypoxic conditions. The article also explores the acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), a consequence of intensive glycolytic activity and proton production by cancer cells. This acidic milieu enhances the invasiveness and metastatic potential of cancer cells and contributes to increased resistance to chemotherapy. Alkalization therapy, which involves neutralizing this acidity through dietary modifications and the administration of alkalizing agents such as sodium bicarbonate, is highlighted as an effective strategy to counteract these adverse conditions and impede cancer progression. Integrating insights from science-based medicine, the review evaluates the effectiveness of alkalization therapy across various cancer types through clinical assessments. Science-based medicine, which utilizes inductive reasoning from observed clinical outcomes, lends support to the hypothesis of metabolic reprogramming in cancer treatment. By addressing both metabolic and environmental disruptions, this review suggests that considering cancer as primarily a metabolic disorder could lead to more targeted and effective treatment strategies, potentially improving outcomes for patients with advanced-stage cancers.