Introduction: CDK 4/6 inhibitors are effectively utilized among patients with hormone-positive, HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The dose reduction for these patients varies between 35% and 57% across multiple trials. We aim to clarify the characteristics of patients who had dosage reduction and the effect of this reduction on survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients who received CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line and subsequent treatment settings were grouped based on dose reductions. Progression-free survival was compared between these groups, and factors influencing dose reduction were analyzed. Results: Multivariate logistic regression study demonstrated that patients aged 65 and older, with a Charlson CI score of 2 or higher, having metastases in three or more sites, and classed as normal weight, had greater dosage reductions. Dose reduction had no impact on progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.114 for first-line treatment, p = 0.528 for second and subsequent-line treatment; p > 0.05). Conclusions: Regarding the absence of disparity in progression-free survival between patients with dose reduction and those without, dose reduction should not be avoided in certain patient groups to ensure therapy continuity and mitigate potential adverse effects.

Background: Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone malignancy. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, survival remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for prognostic markers to guide treatment. Methods: This study included 162 osteosarcoma patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery between January 2009 and March 2024. Patients received either double (cisplatin + doxorubicin) or triple (MAP or PEI) chemotherapy. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The median age was 20 years (IQR: 18–29), and 53.1% were male. Patients who received triple chemotherapy regimens demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to those on doublet regimens. High tumor necrosis rates (>90%) and negative surgical margins were strongly associated with improved OS, while metastatic disease at diagnosis, elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and male gender were linked to poorer survival. Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant therapy, age under 18, high necrosis rate, negative margins, and normal ALP as significant OS predictors. Conclusions: Triple-agent chemotherapy, necrosis rate ≥90 and negative surgical margins are strongly associated with prolonged survival in osteosarcoma. The key prognostic indicators such as ALP levels, surgical margins and age at diagnosis should guide personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes in curable patients.

Background and Objectives: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) offers significant advantages in terms of pathologic response and long-term survival; however, it is still unclear which patients will benefit the most from this treatment. This study aims to investigate the role of metabolic parameters on pretreatment positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) images in predicting treatment response after TNT. Materials and Methods: The research was conducted using a single-center, retrospective design. Patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy are included if they have locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3/T4-N0 or cTany-N1/N2). The patient group was categorized into two groups: CR and non-CR. Clinicopathologic features, PET/CT parameters, CA19-9, and CEA values were compared between these two groups. Results: In total, 52 patients were included. The CR group had 21 patients, and the non-CR group had 31 patients. The analysis demonstrated that the CR group had significantly lower metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than the non-CR group (p = 0.022 vs. p = 0.003, p < 0.05). Also, CA19-9 values were lower than the non-CR group, and this difference was statistically remarkable (p = 0.40, p < 0.05). Conclusions: MTV and TLG parameters in PET/CT for pretreatment staging and pretreatment blood CA 19-9 levels are prognostic factors for predicting treatment response, and they may play a crucial role in choosing treatment. Comprehensive research is warranted on this subject with a larger patient population.

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the role of the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk scoring system in stratifying the intermediate group of metastatic RCC patients who received TKIS in the first-line setting. Methods: A total of 185 patients were included. The adjusted PNI and IMDC model was used to divide the intermediate group into two groups: intermediate PNI-high and intermediate PNI-low groups. The statistical data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: The results showed that the adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score, classic IMDC, and PNI had similar prognostic values. Adjusted PNI-IMDC risk score might be used for a more homogeneous differentiation of the classic intermediate group. On the other hand, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of nephrectomy, adjusted favorable/intermediate (PNI-high) group, ECOG performance score, and presence of bone metastasis were independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Pre-treatment PNI, as a valuable and potential add-on biomarker to the adjusted PNI-IMDC classification model, can be helpful for establishing an improved prognostic model for intermediate group mRCC patients treated with first-line TKISs. Further validation studies are needed to clarify these findings.

Background and Objectives: Despite developments in cervical cancer (CC) treatment, an advanced stage is a poor prognostic factor. Cervical cancer is an immunogenic tumor in which viruses, like HPV, play a role in carcinogenesis. Therefore, systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs) may have prognostic value. Most studies on SIMs focus on the early stage by evaluating pretreatment levels. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic and predictive values of both pretreatment and post-treatment parameters at the advanced stage, as well as treatment efficacy after progression with first-line treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of 133 advanced-stage CC patients with progression on first-line platin–paclitaxel and bevacizumab were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic and histopathological characteristics were recorded along with treatment details. Pre-treatment baseline blood parameters and post-treatment follow-up values were recorded to calculate SIMs as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Results: Median values for SIMs were accepted as cut-off values. Post-treatment values demonstrated stronger predictive power, with pre-treatment SIRI and NLR being significant only in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. High post-treatment SIRI (>2.1) was correlated with shorter overall survival (OS) and considered a poor prognostic factor. High post-treatment SIRI (>2.1), -SII (>746), and -PLR (>197) emerged as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Their prognostic values were clearer in the whole population and the metachronous metastatic subgroup. Rechallenge of platinum-based chemotherapy was an option for those who had at least 6 months of PFS with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Bevacizumab addition to single-agent or combination regimens led to improved ORR as well. Conclusions: Post-treatment SIRI is a promising prognostic factor for OS, while post-treatment SIRI, SII, and PLR may serve as convenient SIMs for PFS. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy reinduction is a feasible second-line treatment strategy, especially with the addition of bevacizumab.

Background: Mucosal malignant melanoma (MMM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. While the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) has emerged as a prognostic marker in various solid tumors, its specific value in MMM remains undefined. This study investigated the association between pretreatment SII and overall survival (OS) in patients with MMM. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 106 adults with histologically confirmed MMM treated at six oncology centers in Turkey between 2005 and 2025. The baseline SII was calculated as platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte counts obtained before definitive treatment. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal SII cutoff of 776 for overall survival (OS), defining low (<776) and high (≥776) SII groups. Results: Gastrointestinal and head and neck mucosa were the most frequent primary sites, and one-third of patients presented with metastatic disease. The median OS for the entire cohort was 23.3 months. Patients with a high versus low SII had a shorter OS (16.2 vs. 35.2 months; HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.67–4.40; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, a high SII (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.12–3.14; p = 0.016), gastrointestinal primary site (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.23–3.23; p = 0.005), and metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR 4.01, 95% CI 2.32–6.94; p < 0.001) independently predicted a worse OS. Conclusions: The SII is a novel, independent prognostic biomarker in MMM. Elevated pretreatment SII correlates with aggressive clinicopathologic features and inferior survival. As a readily accessible and cost-effective marker, SII may facilitate improved risk stratification in routine clinical practice for MMM patients.