Background: Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone malignancy. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, survival remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for prognostic markers to guide treatment. Methods: This study included 162 osteosarcoma patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery between January 2009 and March 2024. Patients received either double (cisplatin + doxorubicin) or triple (MAP or PEI) chemotherapy. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The median age was 20 years (IQR: 18–29), and 53.1% were male. Patients who received triple chemotherapy regimens demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to those on doublet regimens. High tumor necrosis rates (>90%) and negative surgical margins were strongly associated with improved OS, while metastatic disease at diagnosis, elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and male gender were linked to poorer survival. Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant therapy, age under 18, high necrosis rate, negative margins, and normal ALP as significant OS predictors. Conclusions: Triple-agent chemotherapy, necrosis rate ≥90 and negative surgical margins are strongly associated with prolonged survival in osteosarcoma. The key prognostic indicators such as ALP levels, surgical margins and age at diagnosis should guide personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes in curable patients.

Aims: Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in predicting immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in solid tumor patients receiving immunotherapy. Pati... Plain language summary The aim of our study was to find a scale that can predict which patients are most likely to develop side effects of immunotherapy drugs, which work by stimulating the immune ...

Gallbladder and biliary tract tumors are rare but highly fatal cancers. In patients diagnosed with unresectable/metastatic gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinomas, systemic chemotherapy is recommended if the patient's performance is good. Randomized studies on this subject are limited, and there is no standard treatment choice. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a measurement calculated using albumin and absolute lymphocyte value, reflecting the immunological and nutritional status of the cancer patient. The aim of our study is to evaluate the prognostic effectiveness of PNI in unresectable/metastatic gallbladder and biliary tract cancers. The PNI was calculated using albumin and lymphocyte values at the time of diagnosis (10 x albumin g/dL + 0.005 x total lymphocyte/mm3). The relationship between PNI and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was examined. The prognostic nutritional index means of the patients included in the study was 44.8 (95% CI: 42.9-46.7), and the median was 44.77 (minimum: 22, maximum: 61.4). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a statistically significant prediction of patients' OS when the prognostic nutritional index was < 44 (AUC: 0.715, sensitivity: 54.8%, specificity: 33.3%; p=0.08). We evaluated the prognostic effectiveness of PNI in the subgroup of patients who could receive chemotherapy. In patients receiving chemotherapy, median survival was found to be 8.93 months in the PNI < 44 groups, while median survival was found to be 12.58 months in the PNI ≥ 44 group. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.01). In univariate analysis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, cancer antigen 19.9 (Ca 19.9), and PNI were statistically significant variables in predicting OS (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the ECOG performance status, cancer antigen 19.9 (Ca 19.9), and PNI were found to be independent factors in predicting OS (p < 0.05). We believe that PNI can be used as a marker to assist the clinician in evaluating the prognosis of patients in the clinic and predicting treatment tolerance.

Aim: To evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis volume and survival in colorectal cancer patients using the volumetric measurement method.Methods: 114 colorectal cancer patients with isolated liver metastases were included in the study. Liver tumor volume, total liver volume were calculated from the patients images at the time of diagnosis. Vitrea 7.14 imaging software was used for liver volume analysis and volume analysis of each metastasis.Results: Median overall survival(OS) in the group with tumor volume <42 ml³ was 30.98 months In the group with tumor volume ≥42 ml³, median OS was 16.36 months (p: 0.001). In patients who underwent metastasectomy, the median OS in the group with a tumor volume <42 ml³ was 52.3 months, the median OS in the group with a tumor volume ≥42 ml³ was 22.2 months. In patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, the median OS in the <42 ml³ group was 20.23 months, the median OS in the ≥42 ml³ group was 15.63 months.Conclusion: In our study, we found that liver metastasis volume was prognostic for OS. It is argued that tumor volume measurement by volumetric measurement is a widely used method in the decision for metastasectomy in liver metastatic colorectal cancer patients.