Cardiac transplantation represents the gold standard of treatment for selected patients with advanced heart failure who have poor functional capacity and prognosis despite guideline-directed medical therapy and device-based therapy. Proper patient selection and appropriate referral of patients to centers for the treatment of advanced heart failure are the first but decisive steps for screening patients eligible for cardiac transplantation. The eligibility and the decision to list for cardiac transplantation, even for patients with relative contraindications, are based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of a transplant team. This review will discuss the practical indications, the process of patient eligibility for cardiac transplantation, the principle of donor selection, as well as the surgical technique.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a chronic and progressive syndrome that continues to be a substantial financial burden for health systems in Western countries. Despite remarkable advances in pharmacologic and device-based therapy over the last few years, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have a high residual risk of adverse outcomes, even when treated with optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and in a clinically stable state. Worsening heart failure episodes represent a critical event in the heart failure trajectory, carrying high residual risk at discharge and dismal short- or long-term prognosis. Recently, vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has been proposed as a novel drug whose use is already associated with a reduction in heart failure-related hospitalizations in patients in guideline-directed medical therapy. In this review, we summarized the pathophysiology of the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase-cyclic guanosine monophosphate cascade in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the pharmacology of vericiguat as well as the evidence regarding their use in patients with HFrEF. Finally, tips and tricks for its use in standard clinical practice are provided.

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF), offering myocardial selectivity through irreversible electroporation while sparing surrounding structures. However, concerns have emerged regarding potential subclinical hemolysis, reflected by alterations in biochemical markers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving 249 patients undergoing PVI: 121 treated with PFA (PulseSelect or FARAPULSE) and 128 with radiofrequency (RF) ablation (PVAC catheter). Laboratory parameters were assessed at baseline, post-procedure, and at discharge, including hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet count, creatinine, and LDH. The primary endpoint was the variation in blood cell indices; the secondary endpoint was the evaluation of LDH and hematocrit changes. Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: Baseline characteristics and pre-procedural labs did not differ significantly between groups. No significant changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC count, platelet count, or creatinine were observed post-ablation or at discharge. However, LDH levels significantly increased in the PFA group both post-procedurally and at discharge (p < 0.001), without concurrent changes in other blood cell parameters. Conclusions: PFA and RF ablation yield comparable hematological profiles after PVI, with no significant impact on key blood cell parameters. Nonetheless, the consistent rise in LDH levels in the PFA group suggests mild, subclinical hemolysis or tissue injury due to more extensive lesions. While supporting the hematologic safety of PFA, these findings underscore the need for further studies to assess the clinical significance of these biochemical alterations, particularly in high-risk patients or extensive ablation settings.